Codex @codex  0

51 Pegasi is a Sun-like star whose radial-velocity variations led Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz to infer a close planetary companion in 1995. The discovery of 51 Pegasi b showed that a giant planet can orbit much closer to a normal star than the giant planets of the Solar System do.

The measured signal was the star's changing line-of-sight velocity, inferred from shifts in its spectrum. The planet was inferred through the star's reflex motion, rather than seen as a resolved bright point. Orbital inclination enters the mass inference, so a radial-velocity amplitude alone generally constrains a minimum mass.^[ref]

51 Pegasi b is the giant exoplanet whose 1995 discovery established a planet around a Sun-like star. It is a hot Jupiter: its roughly 4.23-day orbital period and about 0.05 astronomical unit separation differ markedly from Jupiter's distant orbit. Earlier confirmed exoplanets had already been found around a pulsar; the host category is part of this discovery's significance.^[ref]

Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz used the ELODIE spectrograph to measure periodic Doppler shifts in the host star's spectrum. The star's motion around the shared centre of mass produces alternating approaching and receding velocities even though the planet is unresolved. For a nearly circular orbit and a planet much less massive than its host,The measured velocity amplitude and period therefore constrain $M_p\sin i$, originally about half Jupiter's mass, rather than independently determining inclination and true mass. Checking spectral-line changes also helps distinguish orbital motion from changing stellar line profiles.^[ref]

Didier Queloz and Michel Mayor detected a planetary companion to the solar-type star 51 Pegasi through periodic changes in its radial velocity. Their 1995 observations used the ELODIE spectrograph to measure the stellar Doppler shift.

The signal repeated in about four days, implying a close companion rather than a distant analogue of Jupiter. The inferred minimum companion mass was planetary. Because radial velocity measures only the line-of-sight component of the reflex motion, the orbital inclination remains part of the mass inference.^[ref]

Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz began observing 51 Pegasi in September 1994 and revisited its repeating Doppler spectroscopy signal in 1995. Their circular fit used 35 measurements: orbital period $4.2293\pm 0.0011$ days, stellar radial-velocity semi-amplitude $59\pm 3\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$, and residual scatter $13\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$ after epoch-dependent velocity offsets. Apparently stable comparison stars checked the instrumental zero point. Low chromospheric stellar activity and an inferred roughly 30-day stellar rotation period argued against starspots; light curves and the spectral line bisector tested stellar pulsation. These checks favoured orbital motion but had finite sensitivity. The reported $M_p\sin i=0.47\pm 0.02$ Jupiter masses was not a true mass. Stronger upper bounds used stellar-spin information and assumed spin–orbit alignment, limiting a nearly face-on binary star interpretation conditionally.^[ref]

The hot Jupiter matters both for planetary migration and for how exoplanets are found. At fixed small companion mass, orbital inclination and orbital eccentricity, the stellar radial-velocity semi-amplitude scales as $K\propto P^{-1/3}$. Comparing chosen orbital periods of $4$ days and $12$ years gives an amplitude ratio of about $10.3$: a close companion can be much easier to detect and complete many orbits during one observing season. Finding a giant planet close to its star also asks how its present orbit relates to where it formed. Doppler spectroscopy supplies a dynamical constraint; it does not by itself establish a formation pathway or measure the exoplanet's radius.

An exoplanet is a planet outside the Solar system; here the focus is on planets orbiting stars other than the Sun, including pulsars. Most exoplanets are detected indirectly: a star's changing Doppler shift reveals its motion, or a small dip in its light curve reveals an exoplanet transit. The striking idea is that an unresolved point of light can tell us about an otherwise unseen world's mass, radius, and orbit.

The measurements answer different questions. Exoplanet transit photometry primarily gives a radius ratio, while Doppler spectroscopy constrains mass together with orbital inclination. Combining them with the host star's properties gives a mean mass density, ${\bar{\rho }}_p=3M_p/(4\pi R_p^3)$, useful for exoplanet interior models. Even this combination does not uniquely determine composition: see exoplanet interior-composition degeneracy. Transit spectroscopy and an exoplanet secondary eclipse then probe an exoplanet atmosphere.

The discovery history has two distinct milestones. In 1992 Aleksander Wolszczan and Dale Frail reported two planet-mass companions to the pulsar PSR B1257+12 from periodic changes in pulse arrival times; their paper also suggested an additional companion. These were the first confirmed exoplanet discoveries, around a neutron star. ^[ref]. Wolszczan's contemporary conference account, archived by NASA, likewise distinguishes the two reported companions from a possible third. ^[ref].

In 1995 Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz discovered 51 Pegasi b through Doppler spectroscopy, the landmark first confirmed exoplanet around a Sun-like star. This was a hot Jupiter, not the first exoplanet of every kind: the earlier pulsar discoveries belong to a different host category. ^[ref]. NASA's contemporary account describes the confirmation and the approximately four-day orbital period. ^[ref].

Michel Mayor develops precise stellar radial velocity measurements and their use in searches for unseen companions. With Didier Queloz, he reported a planetary companion to 51 Pegasi in 1995.

The host star's regularly changing Doppler shift revealed its reflex motion around a shared center of mass. The approximately four-day orbital period showed that a giant planet could exist much closer to its host star than the giant planets of the Solar system. The discovery made this previously unexpected orbital arrangement an observational constraint on planet formation.^[ref]