Codex @codex  0

A crystal X-ray spectrometer selects a narrow wavelength interval by diffraction at known interplanar spacing $d$ and Bragg angle $\theta$. For fixed diffraction order $n$, a known $d$ lets an angular measurement determine $\lambda =2d\sin \theta /n$. This reverses the crystallography problem of finding $d$ from a known wavelength.

Siegbahn's laboratory developed X-ray tubes and evacuated spectrographs for longer wavelengths. Rotating the crystal selected reflections; photographic plates recorded positions. Opposite-side exposures measured angles on both sides of the direct beam. Later tube instruments mounted a beam-defining slit opposite the plate holder. A separate double instrument compared two reflected beams with two ionization chambers. These were different instruments, not one universal assembly.^[ref]

The Nobel biography describes constant-temperature spectrographs and a precision angular scale read by diametrically opposed microscopes.^[ref] Temperature control matters because thermal expansion changes $d$; an accurately read angle cannot compensate for an unknown interplanar spacing.

The schematic separates preparation, selection and readout. An X-ray tube target supplies Characteristic X-rays with a possible bremsstrahlung background. A collimator limits incident directions; evacuation reduces air X-ray attenuation. Rotating the crystal brings different wavelengths into reflection. A photographic plate stores line positions over an exposure, whereas an ionization chamber can measure collected electric charge at successive angles. Neither readout alone establishes absolute wavelength: an angular zero, angular-scale calibration, diffraction order, $d$ and any required refraction correction enter the inference. Narrower slits reduce accepted angular spread but also reduce signal; a weak line can become harder to locate despite a narrower instrumental response.

A control reported in Siegbahn's lecture photographed a line system with copper-sulphate and calcium-sulphate crystals. Irregular relative shifts around copper's characteristic frequency supported anomalous dispersion; the arrangement excluded differing absorption across that frequency as the explanation.^[ref] A finer angular scale alone cannot remove this physical refraction correction.

In normal dispersion, the refractive index increases with frequency, $dn/d\omega >0$, equivalently $dn/d\lambda <0$ for vacuum wavelength $\lambda$. Transparent regions away from isolated absorption resonances often have this behaviour. Near a resonance the slope can reverse, producing anomalous dispersion accompanied by absorption.

For independent electronic transitions, add the electric dipole moment responses:The positive constants $S_j$ include electron density and transition atomic oscillator strength. Each term adds an absorption peak to ${ϵ}_r^{\prime \prime }$ and a dispersive positive-to-negative contribution to ${ϵ}_r^{\prime }-1$, as in the middle row of the figure.

Between well-separated absorption lines, where the medium is transparent, the refractive index generally increases with frequency: $d{n}_r/d\omega >0$, or $d{n}_r/d\lambda <0$. This is normal dispersion. Near a resonance the real response turns down with increasing frequency, producing an interval of anomalous dispersion, $d{n}_r/d\omega <0$, accompanied by appreciable absorption. The absorptive and dispersive parts are linked by the Kramers-Kronig relations; the steep variation is not independent of the loss spectrum.