Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 129 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Use the usual convention that a three-term arithmetic progression must be nonconstant. There is a genuine small-case defect in the printed statement: for , , and , neither conclusion can hold with . We prove the intended Roth density-increment step for every odd integer , including the small values of , rather than silently treating as covered. Counting constant arithmetic progressions would make the first alternative vacuous for every nonempty .
Suppose that has no nonconstant three-term arithmetic progression, and let be its actual density of a finite subset. Thus . Put , , and embed in the cyclic group . A congruence with is an equality over the integers, since . Thus this embedding creates no extra three-term arithmetic progressions. Since is odd, multiplication by two permutes .
Use normalized Fourier analysis on a finite abelian group, with and . For the normalized trilinear arithmetic progression count, character orthogonality givesIndeed, expanding each function in its inverse Fourier transform, averaging in forces , and averaging in then forces . The Parseval identity in this normalization is .
Let , , and , the balanced indicator function of a finite subset. Then . Only constant arithmetic progressions contribute to , whereas summing over centers counts ordered three-term arithmetic progressions in . HenceSet . Telescope by changing one factor at a time:In the Fourier transform formula for each term, bound the Fourier coefficient of by and apply the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality to the other two factors. The permutation preserves the required squared sums. Since and , this givesIf , then , so the difference in the other direction is at least . Consequently Fourier detection of a progression-free subset of an interval gives a nonzero frequency with
To turn this into a density increment, take . The Dirichlet approximation theorem, proved here by placing into equal intervals modulo one, gives such that . DefineFor , the inequalities and show thatUse a progression partition with nearly constant linear phase: every residue chain of modulo has at least points. Split each chain into blocks of consecutive chain points, merging any remainder into its last full block. This partitions into arithmetic progressions with and common difference .
On a block with first point , the linear phase satisfiesLet . Freezing the linear phase on each block introduces error at most . ThereforeThe block sums total zero. Their positive part consequently totals at least . Since all block lengths total , some block has . Its density of a finite subset is at least .
For the remaining , divide into disjoint consecutive triples and a remainder of at most two points. A three-term-arithmetic progression-free uses at most two points of each triple, so ; the largest ratio occurs at . Any singleton set from then has density of a finite subset one, which is at least . We may therefore use the explicit constantsIn the large case the constructed arithmetic progression has length at least ; in the small case its length one does too. Thus these constants prove the intended result for all odd integers .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 130 2 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Let the required arithmetic progression have length , let be the number of colors, and take from the Hales-Jewett theorem. Given any finite coloring of , color a word over an alphabet by . For a monochromatic combinatorial line, let be its active coordinate set and let be the sum of its fixed coordinates. The sums of its words areThey all lie in , have one color, and form an arithmetic progression with strictly positive common difference . Thus, writing for the finite Van der Waerden theorem bound,The length-one case is immediate. Restricting a finite coloring of the positive integers to this finite integer interval gives the infinite-domain formulation of the Van der Waerden theorem as well.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 130 3 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Use the standard definition of a partition regular matrix: for every finite coloring of the positive integers, there is a positive solution whose coordinates all have one color. Coordinates may repeat. Clearing denominators lets us assume ; multiplication of the row by a nonzero rational number changes neither its zero-sum subsets nor its solutions. We prove both directions of the Rado theorem for one equation directly, without invoking any form of Rado's theorem.
For necessity, choose a prime number and use the last nonzero digit coloring: write , with , and assign color . Given a monochromatic solution, let , let , and let be the common color. Divide by and reduce modulo . Terms outside vanish; the others giveThe nonzero residue is invertible modulo the prime number , so divides . This sum has absolute value less than , forcing it to be zero. The set is nonempty by its definition.
For sufficiency we first derive the needed Brauer progression theorem from the permitted Van der Waerden theorem. Fix positive integers . We claim that for every number of colors , a finite integer interval forces a monochromatic setThe case is immediate by taking and . For and , take in an interval of length at least . Suppose the claim holds for and write . By the Van der Waerden theorem, some forces an arithmetic progression of length in with one color . Work in so that all needed multiples also lie in the coloring's domain. If a subprogression of length and step has of color , we are done. Otherwise, for every , the initial long arithmetic progression contains such a subprogression, and avoids color . The induced finite coloring of therefore uses at most colors. The induction hypothesis gives a monochromatic set for this induced finite coloring. Multiplying by gives the desired configuration in the original coloring, with initial term and step . This proves the claim for ; the only use below has .
Now suppose for a nonempty . Choose , put , and put . If , then and any constant positive vector is already a monochromatic solution. Otherwise take and apply the proved Brauer progression theorem with . All of and for have one color. DefineEvery coordinate is a positive integer in that monochromatic set, since is either or . Using the zero sum on givesThus both directions are proved:For the right side is impossible, agreeing with the absence of positive solutions for a single nonzero coefficient.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 130 1 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Hales–Jewett and the arithmetic-progression consequence. For a finite alphabet and a positive integer , the Hales-Jewett theorem gives an integer such that every -color finite coloring of contains a monochromatic combinatorial line. A combinatorial line has a nonempty active coordinate set: all those coordinates receive the same freely varying letter, and the remaining coordinates are fixed.
We first prove the alphabet insensitivity lemma. Fix two letters , with , and a desired dimension . There is a combinatorial subspace of dimension on which changing to in any variable coordinate, with all other variable coordinates arbitrary, preserves the color.
For the construction, divide the coordinates into consecutive blocks. Choose their lengths from left to right byProcess the blocks from right to left. When processing block , the later blocks already form a -dimensional combinatorial subspace. Color each word in block by the vector of its original colors for every prefix word of length and every assignment to those later variables. There are contexts, and at most such color vectors.
The words , , contain two, indexed by , with the same vector by the pigeonhole principle. Fix the first coordinates to , the coordinates after to , and make coordinates the active set of one new variable. Its values now have identical colors for every prefix and later-variable context. The active set is nonempty. Insensitivity already obtained in later blocks survives, because it held for every unrestricted earlier prefix. After all blocks have been processed, changing in any of the variables preserves the color. This proves the lemma.
Now induct on . For , a one-coordinate combinatorial line is automatically monochromatic. For , let be a length supplied by the theorem for alphabet and colors. Apply the alphabet insensitivity lemma for the letters to obtain a -dimensional combinatorial subspace. Restrict its variables to . Induction gives a monochromatic combinatorial line in those variables. Its values have the same color, and its value has the same color as its value by successively switching the active variables. Lifting this line to the original coordinates proves
For the Van der Waerden theorem, fix a progression length and use the alphabet . Pull back an -color finite coloring of alongA combinatorial line with active set maps to the arithmetic progression , where and its common difference is . The Hales-Jewett theorem makes this progression monochromatic. Length one is trivial, so every finite coloring of the positive integers contains monochromatic arithmetic progressions of every finite length.
The active-coordinate obstruction. Color a word red when its first coordinate is , and blue otherwise. Any combinatorial line whose active coordinate set contains has a red word at variable value and a blue word at variable value , since . ThusHere adequacy is the adequate family of active coordinate sets property; an active coordinate set is always nonempty.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 iii Paper 125 3 d Solution 2026-10-03
Part (c) says every rational point is one of the eight torsion points from part (b). Among their -coordinates, the only negative value of the form with is , arising from or . Thus , and the four-term arithmetic progression has common difference zero. ConsequentlyClearing denominators gives Euler's corresponding result for integer squares.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 iii Paper 147 2 Solution 2026-10-03
Let and let be the balanced indicator function, extended by zero to the integers. For finitely supported functions define the linear configuration countSince has no nonconstant three-term arithmetic progression, . On the other hand, . Hence, once is sufficiently large in terms of ,for an absolute .
Use the unnormalized Fourier transform on . Telescoping writes the preceding difference asLet . The Fourier-integral formula for , followed by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and the Parseval identity, bounds these three terms respectively byThey are all at most , sofor an absolute . Choose with .
By the Dirichlet approximation theorem, some integer satisfies . Choose a sufficiently small absolute multiple of . Partition each residue-class progression of common difference into progressions whose lengths lie between and ; for sufficiently large , short final pieces can be joined to the preceding piece. On each , the linear phase varies by at most . Choosing small enough compared with therefore yieldsThe sums over all cells add to , so their positive parts total half their absolute values. At least one consequently satisfiesThis is the Roth density-increment step, and it giveswith and depending only on .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2021 iii Paper 129 2 c Solution Created 2026-09-28 Updated 2026-10-03
Choose a Regular Bohr set with . Standard Bohr-set size estimates give . Set with small enough that regularity givesFor each and , the triangle inequality in every frequency givesBecause is odd, multiplication by two is a bijection, and the pair determines the ordered three-term arithmetic progression uniquely. The lower size bound for a Dilate of a Bohr set givesThe number of progressions in is therefore at least
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2021 iii Paper 129 2 d Solution Created 2026-09-28 Updated 2026-10-03
The Bourgain bound for three-term-progression-free sets states that, if is odd and contains no nonconstant three-term arithmetic progression, then
Here is how it follows from the standard Bohr-set density increment lemma. Begin with and relative density . Whenever the lemma gives its second alternative, replace the current set by the denser translate inside the smaller regular Bohr set. The density changes byso this can happen only times. Throughout the iteration the rank is , the width is at least , and the elementary lower bound for the size of a Bohr set givesAt the terminal stage the first alternative of the density-increment lemma holds. Combining it with the last display yieldsIf , Bourgain's bound is already true. Otherwise , and rearranging proves
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2021 iii Paper 129 4 e Solution 2026-09-28
Consider the graphThe hypothesis says exactly that has at least additive quadruples. By the Balog-Szemerédi-Gowers theorem, it contains with and .
Part b gives a Freiman s-isomorphism from to a set , where it is enough to take any fixed . The set has bounded doubling, with a bound depending only on . Part c therefore provides a proper generalized arithmetic progression of rank such that
Write as a proper parameter box. Since , one of its side lengths tends to infinity with . Averaging over all lines parallel to that side gives a line on which has density bounded below in terms of . The Szemerédi theorem quoted in the question then gives, once is sufficiently large in terms of and , a nonconstant -term arithmetic progression in .
The inverse Freiman isomorphism sends it to a -term arithmetic progression in , because each relation between three consecutive terms is an additive-quadruple relation. Write this progression asIts first-coordinate difference cannot be zero: the graph of a function has only one point above each . Hence . On the nonconstant progressionwe haveTaking and , both in , proves the claim.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 iii Paper 129 3 iii Solution 2026-09-28
The Ruzsa triangle inequality applied to also bounds in terms of , so has bounded doubling. The Freiman-Ruzsa theorem places inside a proper coset progression whose rank and ratio are bounded only in terms of . Hence has positive density bounded in terms of inside a bounded-rank progression.
For sufficiently large , the Szemerédi theorem in a bounded-rank coset progression gives a nontrivial three-term arithmetic progression in . This proves the small difference set forces a three-term arithmetic progression assertion.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 iii Paper 129 4 ii Solution 2026-09-28
WriteApply the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality first in the variable carrying and then in the variable carrying . After the invertible linear changes of variables permitted by , apply the assumed three-function estimate to the resulting multiplicative derivatives. The standard calculation givesBy the Derivative identity for the Gowers U3 norm, the last two factors are and . Taking eighth roots proves
If has density , write . Expanding , the constant term is , and the displayed inequality bounds every nonconstant term after translation of one factor by a norm of the balanced function . Thus sufficiently small makes the normalized number of four-term arithmetic progressions close to .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2024 iii Paper 129 4 iii Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
For , letThe number of ordered three-term arithmetic progressions in isBy the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality,The last sum is the additive energy of , namely the number of additive quadruples. If , then
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 iii Paper 129 2 d Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
Write and identify each character with a residue . Partition the -dimensional torus into cubes of side , where is comparable to . Applying the pigeonhole principle to the pointsgives a nonzero residue satisfyingConsequently whenever . After allowing for integer parts and the small values of , this produces the centered arithmetic progressionof length at least .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 iii Paper 129 2 e Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
Part c gives with . By the arithmetic progression in a cyclic Bohr set, contains a centered progression of length at leastIts translate by is the required arithmetic progression in .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 iii Paper 130 2 a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
The Hales-Jewett theorem states that for positive integers there is such that every -coloring of the words contains a monochromatic combinatorial line.
Here is the standard focused-line proof. Induct on the alphabet size , the case being immediate. Assume the result for and every number of colors. For , prove inductively that some dimension has the following alternative: either there is a monochromatic combinatorial line, or there are color-focused lines, meaning that the lines without their common focus are monochromatic in distinct colors. For , restrict to words on and use the induction hypothesis on .
For the step from to , let work for and view a longer word as . Color each by the complete patternwhich uses at most colors. Taking gives a line on which this entire pattern is constant. Append its missing -letter endpoint. Applying the alternative to the induced coloring of the first block and joining the active coordinate sets produces either a monochromatic line or lines with one common focus and distinct colors. At , the focus has one of the colors, so it completes the line carrying that color. This proves the theorem.
To deduce the Van der Waerden theorem, let and color a word by the color of . On a combinatorial line with active set , these sums area monochromatic arithmetic progression of length .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 iii Paper 130 2 c Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
Restrict the coloring to the diagonal by setting . We give the direct focusing proof of a monochromatic three-term arithmetic progression. For each , induction constructs a finite interval in which either there is a monochromatic three-term progression or there are color-focused two-term progressions. The case is the pigeonhole principle. For the induction step, take sufficiently many equal blocks that two have identical color patterns. Translate the focused pairs in the first block to the second and join corresponding points. These give focused pairs at a translated focus; the pair formed by the old and translated focuses supplies the last one. If its color repeated one of the previous colors, the associated pair and the focus would already form a monochromatic three-term progression. Thus the alternative holds.