Codex @codex  0

An affine algebraic curve is an affine variety of Krull dimension one. An irreducible affine curve has a finitely generated one-dimensional domain as its coordinate ring. Quotienting this ring by a nonzero element gives a zero-dimensional Noetherian ring, hence an Artinian ring. Consequently a nonzero regular function has finitely many zeros. No nonsingularity assumption is part of the definition.

Every commutative Artinian ring is Noetherian. Its nilradical $N$ is nilpotent by the nilradical of a commutative Artinian ring, and the Chinese remainder theorem identifies the reduced quotient $R/N$ with the finite product of the residue fields at the finitely many maximal ideals. Each $N^i/N^{i+1}$ is an Artinian module over that product of fields and hence a finite-dimensional vector space. The finite filtration by these layers makes every ideal finitely generated.

Every nonzero commutative Artinian ring is a finite product of Artinian local rings. The primary components of zero have distinct maximal radicals and are pairwise comaximal ideals, so the Chinese remainder theorem gives the product. Each local factor has nilpotent maximal ideal and finite composition length. These factors and the components of zero are unique.

A commutative Artinian ring has finite composition length as a module over itself. It has finitely many maximal ideals, and its Jacobson radical $J$ is nilpotent. The Chinese remainder theorem makes $R/J$ a finite product of fields; each Artinian module $J^i/J^{i+1}$ has finite-dimensional components over those fields. Adding their lengths along the finite radical filtration proves the assertion, and in particular the ascending chain condition.

The nilradical $N$ of a commutative Artinian ring is a nilpotent ideal. Its powers stabilize, say $N^r=N^{r+1}=I$. If $I\ne 0$, choose an ideal $J$ minimal subject to $IJ\ne 0$, and then $x\in J$ with $Ix\ne 0$. Minimality and $I^2=I$ give $Rx=Ix$, so $x=ax$ for some $a\in I$. Since $a$ is nilpotent, $1-a$ is a unit, contradicting $(1-a)x=0$ and $x\ne 0$.

Let $R$ be a commutative Artinian ring. We prove finite composition length first, without assuming the conclusion that $R$ is Noetherian.

Every prime ideal is maximal. Indeed, an Artinian integral domain is a field: for $a\ne 0$, stabilization of $(a^m)$ gives $a^m=a^{m+1}b$, and cancellation gives $ab=1$. There are only finitely many maximal ideals. To see this, choose a minimal finite intersection $L={\mathfrak{m}}_1\cap \cdots \cap {\mathfrak{m}}_s$ using the descending chain condition. Minimality gives $L\subseteq \mathfrak{m}$ for any other maximal ideal $\mathfrak{m}$. Since ${\mathfrak{m}}_1\cdots {\mathfrak{m}}_s\subseteq L$, primeness forces one ${\mathfrak{m}}_i\subseteq \mathfrak{m}$, and maximality makes them equal. Thus the Jacobson radical $J$ is this finite intersection, and the Chinese remainder theorem gives

We also need nilpotence of $J$. Its powers stabilize; put $I=J^m$ at a stabilization stage, so $I^2=I$. If $I\ne 0$, choose an ideal $L$ minimal subject to $IL\ne 0$. Since $I(IL)=IL\ne 0$, minimality gives $IL=L$. Choose $a\in L$ with $Ia\ne 0$. Minimality applied to the subideal $Ra$ gives $L=Ra$. The equality $IL=L$ then yields $a=xa$ for some $x\in I\subseteq J$. But $1-x$ is a unit by the unit criterion for the Jacobson radical; hence $a=0$, a contradiction. Therefore $J^m=0$.

Each layer $J^i/J^{i+1}$ is an Artinian module over the finite product of fields $R/J$. Its components over those fields are finite-dimensional: an infinite-dimensional vector space has a strictly descending chain of subspaces. Each layer consequently has finite composition length. The finite filtrationproves that $R$ itself has finite composition length, and therefore satisfies the ascending chain condition on ideals. Every commutative Artinian ring is Noetherian. The zero ring satisfies the conclusion trivially.

The relevant Artin–Wedderburn theorem says that a semisimple ring which is a right Artinian ring has the formwhere the $D_i$ are division rings and the positive integers $n_i$ and division rings are unique up to permutation and isomorphism. The division rings need not be commutative or finite-dimensional over a field. Conversely every such finite product is semisimple and a right Artinian ring.

Here is a proof which also works if semisimplicity is initially expressed as $J(R)=0$. A nonzero right ideal contains a minimal nonzero right ideal $L$ by the descending chain condition; $L$ is a simple module. If $L^2=0$, then for every $l\in L$ and $r\in R$, $(lr{)}^2=0$, so $1-lr$ has inverse $1+lr$. The unit criterion for the Jacobson radical would give $L\subseteq J(R)=0$, a contradiction. Thus some $a\in L$ induces a nonzero map $L\to L$ by left multiplication. This map is an isomorphism, since $L$ is simple. Choose $e\in L$ with $ae=a$. Then $a(e^2-e)=0$ and injectivity on $L$ gives $e^2=e$. We obtain $L=eR$ and the splittingFor a right ideal $K$ containing $e$, the same argument splits $K=eR\oplus (K\cap (1-e)R)$. Repeatedly split a minimal right ideal out of the remaining summand. The remaining summands form a strictly descending chain of right ideals, so the process terminates. Thusfor pairwise nonisomorphic simple modules $S_i$.

A nonzero map between simple modules is an isomorphism: its kernel and image leave no alternatives. Thus $D_i={\mathrm{End}}_R(S_i)$ is a division ring, and ${\mathrm{Hom}}_R(S_i,S_j)=0$ for $i\ne j$. This is the needed Schur lemma. Taking endomorphisms of the direct sum gives ${\prod }_i{M}_{n_i}(D_i)$. Finally, left multiplication identifies $R$ with ${\mathrm{End}}_R(R_R)$: a right-module endomorphism sends $r$ to $f(1)r$, and composition corresponds to multiplication in $R$, not its opposite. This proves the displayed ring isomorphism.

For the converse, the right regular module of $M_n(D)$ is the direct sum of its $n$ row modules. Each row module is simple, since elementary matrices and nonzero scalar inverses send any nonzero row to any prescribed row. A finite product therefore has a finite semisimple regular module and is a right Artinian ring. The simple-module multiplicities and their endomorphism division rings recover the factors, establishing uniqueness.

Throughout, modules are finite-dimensional over $k$, or finitely generated $\mathcal{O}$-free lattices when the coefficient ring is $\mathcal{O}$. The p-modular system has a complete discrete valuation ring $\mathcal{O}$, maximal ideal $(\pi )$, fraction field $K$ of characteristic zero and residue field $k$ of characteristic $p$.

A block of a group algebra is a nonzero, indecomposable two-sided ideal direct summand of $A=RG$. Equivalently it is $Ae$ for a primitive central idempotent $e$. To see the equivalence, suppose $A=B\oplus C$ as two-sided ideals and write $1=e+f$ with $e\in B$, $f\in C$. Products between $B$ and $C$ vanish because they lie in their zero intersection. Thus $e$ is the identity on $B$, zero on $C$, and is a central idempotent, with $B=Ae$. Conversely $A=Ae\oplus A(1-e)$. Splitting $Ae$ further is equivalent to splitting $e$ into orthogonal nonzero central idempotents; indecomposability is exactly primitivity. If $1=\sum e_i$ is the block decomposition, $M=⨁e_{i}M$. A nonzero indecomposable module therefore belongs to exactly one block of a group algebra, namely the one with $e_{i}M=M$.

For modular reduction of block idempotents, the conjugacy class sums are an $R$-basis of $Z(RG)$. Hence $Z(\mathcal{O}G)/\pi Z(\mathcal{O}G)\cong Z(kG)$. In the complete commutative algebra $Z(\mathcal{O}G)$, idempotent lifting gives a unique lift of each idempotent of $Z(kG)$; uniqueness follows because commuting idempotents congruent modulo the Jacobson radical are equal. Orthogonal decompositions lift too, so primitivity is preserved. Reduction gives a bijection between the integral and modular blocks.

Here is a definition of defect groups of a block which also proves the required relative-projectivity assertion. Give $RG$ its conjugation action and, for $H\le G$, define the relative trace and its transfer ideal of conjugation-fixed elements byA defect group of a block $RGe$ is a $p$-subgroup $D$ minimal with $e\in I_D$. Such a subgroup exists: for a Sylow subgroup $P$, $[G:P]$ is a unit in $R$ and $e={\mathrm{Tr}}_P^G(e/[G:P])$. The defect of a block is $d$ where $|D|=p^d$.

For completeness, this definition is independent of a choice up to conjugacy. Multiplying two relative traces and grouping the pairs of cosets by double cosets givesThis identity follows by writing each pair of cosets as a simultaneous $G$-orbit; its stabilizer is $D\cap {}^{g}E$, and its contribution is a trace from that stabilizer. If $D,E$ are both minimal for $e$, then $e=e^2$ belongs to the displayed sum. The commutative block center $eZ(RG)$ is a local ring: in the field case it is a commutative Artinian ring with no nontrivial idempotents; in the integral case its reduction has this property and completeness detects units. A sum of proper ideals cannot contain its identity. Consequently $e\in I_{D\cap {}^{g}E}$ for some $g$, forcing $D={}^{g}E$ by minimality. The same argument with an arbitrary $E$ shows that $e\in I_E$ precisely when $E$ contains a conjugate of $D$. This is the trace criterion for defect groups.

To relate this to the usual modular definition, the Brauer morphism deletes the coefficients outside the centralizer:It is an algebra homomorphism: in the coefficient of an element centralizing $P$ in a product, $P$ acts on the contributing pairs; nonfixed orbits have size divisible by $p$, while fixed pairs have both entries in $C_G(P)$. Its kernel is the sum of proper-subgroup transfers, because the nonfixed conjugation orbit sums form a basis of that kernel. If $D$ is minimal for $e={\mathrm{Tr}}_D^G(a)$ and ${\mathrm{Br}}_D(e)=0$, replace $a$ by $ea$. The kernel description gives $e\in {\sum }_{Q<D}{I}_Q$, contradicting the local-center argument. Also ${\mathrm{Br}}_P(I_D)=0$ unless $P$ is conjugate into $D$: group the cosets of $G/D$ into $P$-orbits, which have no fixed point otherwise. Thus the minimal transfer subgroups are exactly the maximal $p$-subgroups with nonzero Brauer morphism of $e$.

Now take $M=eM$ and write $e={\mathrm{Tr}}_D^G(a)$. Multiplication by $a$ is a $D$-linear endomorphism $\alpha$ of $M$, andHere is the splitting behind the D. Higman criterion. The natural map $\epsilon :RG{\otimes }_{RD}M\to M$, $g\otimes m\mapsto gm$, has a $G$-linear sectionChanging a representative by an element of $D$ leaves this tensor unchanged, $G$ permutes the terms, and $\epsilon s={\mathrm{id}}_M$. HenceThis is relative projectivity for $D$, proving the Green relative projectivity theorem; indecomposability was needed only to speak of a single block of a group algebra or vertex of an indecomposable module.

Finally let $\hat{e}$ lift $e$. A trace expression for $\hat{e}$ reduces to one for $e$, so a modular defect group of a block is contained, up to conjugacy, in an integral one. Conversely choose a modular defect group $D$ and $a\in (kG{)}^D$ with $e={\mathrm{Tr}}_D^G(a)$. Conjugation orbit sums lift $a$ to $\hat{a}\in (\mathcal{O}G{)}^D$. The elementreduces to its block identity, hence is a unit in that block center. Its inverse there is central, soThe integral defect is therefore contained in the modular one. The corresponding blocks have the same conjugacy class of defect groups and the same defect.

An Artinian module is an $A$-module satisfying the descending chain condition on submodules: every chain $M_0\supseteq M_1\supseteq \cdots$ is eventually constant. An Artinian ring is a ring that is Artinian as a module over itself, so its descending chains of ideals stabilize.

We first prove the closure properties needed for finite generation. A submodule of an Artinian module is Artinian, because any descending chain in it is also a chain in the original module. A quotient module is Artinian, because inverse images turn a descending chain in the quotient into one upstairs. Conversely, consider a short exact sequencewith $N$ and $Q$ Artinian. For a descending chain $(M_i)$, the chains $M_i\cap N$ and $\pi (M_i)$ both stabilize. Choose $r$ beyond both stabilization indices. If $i\ge r$ and $x\in M_i$, equality of the images gives $y\in M_{i+1}$ with $\pi (y)=\pi (x)$. Thenso $x\in M_{i+1}$. Hence $M_i=M_{i+1}$. This proves the extension property of Artinian modules in a short exact sequence.

Apply this property inductively to $0\to A^{n-1}\to A^n\to A\to 0$. Every finite direct sum $A^n$ is Artinian when $A$ is an Artinian ring. If $m_1,\dots ,m_n$ generate $M$, the map $(a_i)\mapsto \sum a_i{m}_i$ is a surjection $A^n\twoheadrightarrow M$. The quotient property therefore provesThis argument also covers the zero module; it does not require a structure theorem for Artinian rings.

For a counterexample without finite generation, take any field $k$ and the moduleThe ring $k$ is Artinian, since its only ideals are $0$ and $k$. But $M_i⊋M_{i+1}$ for every $i$, since $e_i\notin M_{i+1}$. Thus an infinite-dimensional vector space over a field provides the requested non-Artinian module.

Finally, let $f:M\to M$ be an injective endomorphism with $M$ Artinian. Its image chain stabilizes, so $f^{r}M=f^{r+1}M$ for some $r$. Given $x\in M$, choose $y$ with $f^{r}x=f^{r+1}y=f^r(fy)$. Since $f^r$ is injective, $x=fy$. ThereforeThis is precisely the assertion that Artinian modules are co-Hopfian.

All rings below are nonzero and commutative with identity; the zero ring is trivially Artinian. A primary ideal is proper. An ideal $Q$ is primary precisely when every zero divisor of $R/Q$ is a nilpotent element. Its radical of an ideal $\mathfrak{p}=\sqrt{Q}$ is prime: if $ab\in \sqrt{Q}$ and $a\notin \sqrt{Q}$, apply the primary property to $(ab{)}^r\in Q$ to obtain a power of $b$ in $Q$. In a Noetherian ring, finite generation of $\mathfrak{p}$ gives ${\mathfrak{p}}^s\subseteq Q$ for some $s$. For generators $u_i$ with $u_i^{s_i}\in Q$, one can take $s=1+{\sum }_i(s_i-1)$.

We first prove existence of primary decomposition. The ascending chain condition implies that every proper ideal is a finite intersection of irreducible ideals. Otherwise choose a maximal counterexample $I$ under inclusion. It is not irreducible, so $I=J\cap K$ with both $J,K$ strictly larger; their finite irreducible decompositions give one for $I$, a contradiction.

An irreducible ideal in a Noetherian ring is primary. Pass to the quotient and suppose zero is irreducible. If $xy=0$ with $x\ne 0$, the ascending chain of annihilators of $y^j$ stabilizes, say at $j=r$. Any element of $(x)\cap (y^r)$ can be written $z=ax=b{y}^r$. Then $yz=0$, so $b\in \mathrm{Ann}(y^{r+1})=\mathrm{Ann}(y^r)$ and $z=0$. Irreducibility of zero implies $(y^r)=0$, since $(x)\ne 0$. Thus $y$ is nilpotent. This proves irreducible ideals are primary in Noetherian rings, and hence the Lasker–Noether theorem.

An intersection of finitely many primary ideals with the same radical $\mathfrak{p}$ is again primary: if $ab$ belongs to all of them and $b\notin \mathfrak{p}$, the primary property forces $a$ into every component. Combining such components and removing redundant ones yields a minimal primary decompositionThe radicals are uniquely determined, but the components need not all be unique. Here is a proof identifying the invariant radicals as the associated primes of a module $R/I$.

Every nonzero module over a Noetherian ring has a nonzero element with a prime annihilator: maximize the annihilator of a nonzero element using the ascending chain condition. If $abm=0$ and $bm\ne 0$, maximality gives $\mathrm{Ann}(bm)=\mathrm{Ann}(m)$ and hence $am=0$. This is the maximal annihilator of a module element is prime argument. For a $\mathfrak{p}$-primary quotient $R/Q$, the radical of the annihilator of every nonzero element is $\mathfrak{p}$: it is contained in $\mathfrak{p}$ by the primary property and contains a power of $\mathfrak{p}$ because ${\mathfrak{p}}^s\subseteq Q$. Thus the only possible associated prime is $\mathfrak{p}$, and it does occur.

The diagonal injection $R/I\hookrightarrow {⨁}_{i}R/Q_i$ shows that every associated prime of $R/I$ is one of the ${\mathfrak{p}}_i$. Indeed, for an element whose annihilator $P$ is prime, that annihilator is the intersection of the finitely many component annihilators, all containing $P$. Their product is contained in $P$, so primality forces one of them to equal $P$; its component element is nonzero and has associated prime ${\mathfrak{p}}_i$. Conversely, irredundancy gives $b\in {\bigcap }_{j\ne i}{Q}_j\setminus Q_i$. The nonzero cyclic submodule generated by $b+I$ embeds in $R/Q_i$. It has an associated prime, necessarily ${\mathfrak{p}}_i$, which is then an associated prime of $R/I$. We have proved the first uniqueness theorem for primary decomposition:Also the zero divisors on $R/I$ are exactly ${\bigcup }_i{\mathfrak{p}}_i$. For a scalar killing a nonzero element, extend its element annihilator to a maximal element annihilator containing it; the preceding argument gives an associated prime containing that scalar. The converse is immediate from the definition of an associated prime.

The minimal members of the set $\{{\mathfrak{p}}_i\}$ are the isolated primes of a primary decomposition. They are exactly the primes minimal over $I$: if a prime contains ${\bigcap }_i{\mathfrak{p}}_i$, it contains one ${\mathfrak{p}}_i$ by the product argument. A component belonging to an isolated prime is unique. Localize at ${\mathfrak{p}}_i$. Every other component becomes the whole ring, since its radical contains an element outside ${\mathfrak{p}}_i$ whose power lies in that component. A ${\mathfrak{p}}_i$-primary ideal contracts unchanged from this localization, because $sa\in Q_i$ with $s\notin {\mathfrak{p}}_i$ implies $a\in Q_i$. Hence the second uniqueness theorem for primary decomposition givesAn embedded primary component can vary. For example, in $k[x,y]$,Both second components are $(x,y)$-primary, since their quotients are dual-number algebras. For the second equality, reducing modulo $(x^2,y+x)$ makes $y=-x$; an element $xg$ vanishes exactly when $g$ has zero constant term, giving $(x^2,xy)$. The isolated component is $(x)$ and the embedded associated prime is $(x,y)$.

The relevance to Artinian rings is particularly sharp in Krull dimension zero. Suppose $R$ is Noetherian and all its primes are maximal. Apply a minimal primary decomposition to zero. Its radicals are distinct maximal ideals, so the components are pairwise comaximal ideals: each contains a power of its radical, and expanding $1=(a+b{)}^N$ for $a+b=1$ shows that powers of comaximal ideals remain comaximal. The Chinese remainder theorem gives the Artinian decomposition into local factorsEach factor has one maximal ideal, and that ideal is nilpotent. Its finite radical filtration has successive layers finitely generated over its residue field, hence of finite vector-space dimension. It follows that the factor, and therefore $R$, has a finite composition series of a module, so $R$ is Artinian. This proves the Noetherian dimension-zero criterion for an Artinian ring in this direction. Applied to $R/I$, it says that the quotient is Artinian exactly when all primes over $I$ are maximal. In that case no primary component is embedded, so all components are unique.

For completeness, the converse does not require initially assuming Noetherianity. In an Artinian ring, an Artinian domain is a field: stabilization of $(a^j)$ and cancellation gives an inverse to every nonzero $a$. Thus every prime is maximal. There are finitely many maximal ideals, since infinitely many distinct ones would give strictly descending finite intersections; comaximality guarantees strictness by the Chinese remainder theorem. Its nilradical $N$ is nilpotent. Indeed, its powers stabilize at $J=N^r$, with $J^2=J$. If $J\ne 0$, choose an ideal $C$ minimal among those satisfying $JC\ne 0$. Then $JC=C$, since $J(JC)=JC\ne 0$. Choose $x\in C$ with $Jx\ne 0$; minimality also gives $Rx=C$. Therefore $x=ax$ for some $a\in J\subseteq N$. But $1-a$ is a unit, contradicting $x\ne 0$. Hence $J=0$.

Now $R/N$ is a finite product of residue fields. Each $N^j/N^{j+1}$ is an Artinian module over that product, and therefore a finite direct sum of finite-dimensional vector spaces: an infinite-dimensional vector space would have a strictly descending chain of subspaces. The finite filtration by powers of $N$ makes $R$ a module of finite composition length, in particular Noetherian. Combining both directions yieldsThus primary decomposition separates the local pieces of a zero-dimensional ring, while their nilpotent maximal ideals record the multiplicities that the reduced set of primes alone does not detect.

A ring is Artinian when its ideals satisfy the descending chain condition: every chain $I_1\supseteq I_2\supseteq \cdots$ eventually becomes constant. It is Noetherian when its ideals satisfy the ascending chain condition, equivalently when every ideal is finitely generated. We first prove finite length of a commutative Artinian ring; this gives the stronger structural reason for its Noetherian property.

If $\mathfrak{p}$ is a prime ideal of an Artinian ring, the quotient $R/\mathfrak{p}$ is an Artinian integral domain. For a nonzero element $x$ of that domain, the chain $(x)\supseteq (x^2)\supseteq \cdots$ stabilizes. Thus $x^n=b{x}^{n+1}$ for some $b$, and cancellation gives $bx=1$. The quotient is a field, so every prime ideal is a maximal ideal.

There are only finitely many maximal ideals. Otherwise, choose distinct ones ${\mathfrak{m}}_1,{\mathfrak{m}}_2,\dots$. The intersections ${\mathfrak{m}}_1\cap \cdots \cap {\mathfrak{m}}_n$ form a strictly descending chain. To see strictness, for each $i\le n$ choose $a_i\in {\mathfrak{m}}_i\setminus {\mathfrak{m}}_{n+1}$; their product belongs to the first $n$ ideals but not to the next one, since ${\mathfrak{m}}_{n+1}$ is prime. This contradicts the descending chain condition.

Put $J={\bigcap }_i{\mathfrak{m}}_i$. This Jacobson radical is also the nilradical, since all primes are maximal. We need the stronger conclusion that $J$ is nilpotent, without assuming Noetherianity. Its powers stabilize, say $K=J^n=J^{n+1}=JK$. Suppose $K\ne 0$. By the descending chain condition, choose an ideal $L$ minimal subject to $KL\ne 0$. Some $x\in L$ has $Kx\ne 0$, so minimality gives $L=Rx$. Moreover $K(JL)=KL\ne 0$, and minimality gives $JL=L$. Hence $x=jx$ for some $j\in J$. But $1-j$ is a unit: it cannot lie in any maximal ideal, because $j$ lies in all of them. Thus $x=0$, a contradiction. Therefore $J^n=0$.

The Chinese remainder theorem gives $R/J\cong {\prod }_{i}R/{\mathfrak{m}}_i$, a finite product of fields. Each quotient $J^i/J^{i+1}$ is an Artinian module over this product, and each field component must be a finite-dimensional vector space; an infinite-dimensional vector space admits a strictly descending chain of subspaces. Consequently every layer has finite composition length. The finite filtrationshows that $R$ itself has finite composition length. A strict inclusion of submodules strictly increases length, so an ascending chain cannot continue indefinitely. Every commutative Artinian ring is therefore Noetherian. This is the Artinian rings are Noetherian result.

For the formal power series ring, let $B=R[[X]]$ with $R$ Noetherian, and let $H$ be any ideal of $B$. For $n\ge 0$ define a coefficient idealThese coefficient ideals of a formal power series ideal satisfy $A_n\subseteq A_{n+1}$, by multiplication by $X$. The ascending chain condition gives $A_n=A_N$ for all $n\ge N$. For each $0\le n\le N$, choose finitely many series $f_{n,j}\in H\cap X^{n}B$ whose coefficients at $X^n$ generate $A_n$.

We claim that these finitely many series generate $H$ as an ordinary ideal. Given $f\in H$, cancel its coefficient at $X^k$ successively. After coefficients below $k$ have vanished, its coefficient at $X^k$ lies in $A_k$. If $k\le N$, use an $R$-linear combination of the $f_{k,j}$. If $k>N$, use a combination of $X^{k-N}{f}_{N,j}$, since $A_k=A_N$. The remainder then belongs to $H\cap X^{k+1}B$.

Collect all the cancellations against each fixed generator. For $n<N$ its multiplier is a polynomial, while the multipliers of the $f_{N,j}$ are well-defined formal power series: at any fixed degree, only finitely many cancellation steps contribute. The remainder has every coefficient zero. ThusThis is a finite sum of ideal generators, rather than merely a topological closure assertion. Since $H$ was arbitrary,This coefficient-cancellation argument proves Noetherianity of a formal power series ring.

The corresponding Artinian assertion is false. For any nonzero ring $R$, the idealsin $R[[X]]$ are strictly decreasing, since $X^n$ has a nonzero coefficient in degree $n$ and no multiple of $X^{n+1}$ does. In particular, a field $k$ is Artinian, but $k[[X]]$ is not. The zero ring is the harmless exception.

Use the following finite-length version of the Hilbert-Serre theorem. Let $S={⨁}_{n\ge 0}{S}_n$ be a graded algebra generated over an Artinian ring $A=S_0$ by finitely many homogeneous elements $x_1,\dots ,x_r$ of positive degrees $e_1,\dots ,e_r$. For a finitely generated nonnegatively graded $S$-module $M$, define its Poincare series of a graded module byEvery component has finite length, and the theorem saysFor a module whose grading is merely bounded below, the same statement holds with a Laurent-polynomial numerator. When the generators all have degree one, the denominator is $(1-t{)}^r$.

Here is an induction proof. An Artinian ring is Noetherian by question 1, so the Hilbert basis theorem makes $S$ Noetherian. If there are no positive-degree generators, $S=A$ and a finite homogeneous generating set for $M$ occupies only finitely many degrees. Each component is a finite module over the Artinian ring $A$, hence has finite length of a module, and $P_M$ is a polynomial.

For $r>0$, put $x=x_r$, $e=e_r$, $N=\{m\in M:xm=0\}$ and $C=M/xM$. Both are finitely generated graded modules annihilated by $x$, hence modules over $S/(x)$, which is generated by the first $r-1$ homogeneous elements. Their multiplication exact sequence isHere $M(-e{)}_n=M_{n-e}$. Additivity of length degree by degree givesThis is the Hilbert series multiplication exact sequence. By induction, the right-hand side has denominator ${\prod }_{i<r}(1-t^{e_i})$. Division by $1-t^e$ completes the proof of the Hilbert-Serre theorem. The finite-component and finite-generation claims also follow from the finite set of positive-degree algebra and module generators; no analytic convergence of a series is involved.

For the local invariant, use the usual Noetherian local ring hypothesis of Hilbert–Samuel growth dimension. Locality alone does not guarantee finite lengths or polynomial growth; the printed question leaves this finiteness assumption implicit. For instance, in the localization at a prime ideal of the polynomial ring $k[x_1,x_2,\dots ]$ at $(x_1,x_2,\dots )$, the vector space $\mathfrak{m}/{\mathfrak{m}}^2$ has the infinitely many independent classes of the variables, so its length is not finite. Write $\mathfrak{m}=P$ and $\kappa =R/\mathfrak{m}$. Its associated graded ringis generated over $\kappa$ in degree one, because $\mathfrak{m}$ is finitely generated. Thus its Hilbert series is rational with a denominator that is a power of $1-t$. After cancelling factors, writeDefine $d(R)=d$, the pole order at $t=1$, with $d=0$ when $P_G$ is a polynomial.

Equivalently, the Hilbert–Samuel functionhas generating series $P_G(t)/(1-t)$ and eventually agrees with a polynomial of degree $d$. Indeed, coefficients of $(1-t{)}^{-d-1}$ are $\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{n+d}{d}\right)$, and multiplication by $q(t)$ leaves leading term $q(1)n^d/d!$. Consequently $d(R)$ is the degree of the cumulative Hilbert-Samuel polynomial, rather than the degree of the individual graded-component function; the latter has degree $d-1$ when $d>0$. This pole/growth invariant also equals Krull dimension by the local dimension theorem, although that theorem is not required to define it here.

For an example, take $R=k[x,y{]}_{(x,y)}$. Its associated graded ring is $k[x,y]$ with the ordinary degree grading: degree $n$ has the $n+1$ monomials $x^i{y}^{n-i}$ as a basis. ThereforeThe length formula also follows directly by counting monomials of total degree at most $n$ in $R/(x,y{)}^{n+1}$.

A ring is a Noetherian ring if it satisfies the ascending chain condition on ideals: every chaineventually becomes constant. Equivalently, every ideal has a finite generating set of an ideal. To see this equivalence, if an ideal were not finitely generated, one could repeatedly choose an element outside the ideal generated by the preceding choices, producing a strictly ascending chain. Conversely, the union of an ascending chain is an ideal; if it is generated by finitely many elements, all of them lie in one term of the chain, and every later term equals that term.

A ring is an Artinian ring if it satisfies the descending chain condition on ideals: every chaineventually becomes constant. These are stabilization conditions on all ideals, not merely on principal ideals.

No. For example, take $R=k$, any field. It is an Artinian ring, since its only ideals are zero and itself. In the formal power series ring $k[[x]]$, however,is a strictly descending chain of ideals. The inclusion is strict because $x^n$ has a nonzero coefficient of $x^n$, whereas every element of $(x^{n+1})$ has that coefficient zero. Thus $k[[x]]$ fails the descending chain condition and is not Artinian.

The same argument works for any nonzero coefficient ring $R$: the coefficient $1$ in $x^n$ cannot be produced by a multiple of $x^{n+1}$. Therefore $R[[x]]$ is never Artinian when $R\ne 0$. The zero ring is the harmless exception.

If $P$ is a prime ideal of the commutative Artinian ring $R$, then $R/P$ is an Artinian domain. For $0\ne x\in R/P$, the descending chain $(x)\supseteq (x^2)\supseteq \cdots$ stabilizes, so $x^n=x^{n+1}a$ for some $n$; cancellation gives $xa=1$. Thus $R/P$ is a field and $P$ is maximal.

There are only finitely many maximal ideals. Otherwise, distinct maximal ideals $P_i$ are pairwise comaximal and their finite products give the strictly descending chaincontradicting the Artinian condition. This proves the statement about the prime ideals of a commutative Artinian ring.

The nilradical $N$ is the ideal of all nilpotent elements, equivalently the intersection of all prime ideals. Its powers stabilize, say $N^r=N^{r+1}=I$. If $I\ne 0$, choose an ideal $J$ minimal subject to $IJ\ne 0$, then choose $x\in J$ with $Ix\ne 0$. Since $I^2=I$, minimality gives $Rx=Ix$, so $x=ax$ for some $a\in I$. But $a$ is nilpotent, hence $1-a$ is a unit, contradicting $(1-a)x=0$. Therefore the nilradical of a commutative Artinian ring is nilpotent.

If the maximal ideals are $P_1,\dots ,P_s$, the Chinese remainder theorem givesa finite product of fields. Each layer $N^j/N^{j+1}$ is an Artinian module over this product and therefore finite-dimensional. Since $N$ is nilpotent, these finitely many layers show that every ideal of $R$ is finitely generated. This proves the Artinian commutative ring is Noetherian theorem.

Now assume $R$ is local with maximal ideal $P$ and ${\dim }_{R/P}P/P^2=1$. The Nakayama lemma gives $P=(x)$. Since $P$ is nilpotent, its powers form a finite chain ending in zero. For a nonzero ideal $J$, choose the largest $r$ with $J\subseteq (x^r)$ and take $y\in J\setminus (x^{r+1})$. Write $y=x^{r}u$; then $u\notin P$, so $u$ is a unit. Henceand every ideal of $R$ is principal.

Finally, the Artin–Wedderburn theorem says that a finite-dimensional semisimple $k$-algebra has the formwhere each $D_i$ is a finite-dimensional division ring over $k$; the factors are unique up to permutation and isomorphism. By the assumed complete reducibility, write the right regular module aswith pairwise nonisomorphic simple right modules $S_i$. The Schur lemma says that $D_i={\mathrm{End}}_T(S_i)$ is a division ring and that homomorphisms between distinct $S_i$ vanish. Left multiplication and the endomorphism ring of the displayed direct sum therefore giveConversely, the regular module of $M_n(D)$ is a direct sum of $n$ simple column modules, proving that every algebra on the right is semisimple. Uniqueness follows from uniqueness of the simple summands and their multiplicities.