For a linear, fixed-frequency beam splitter, choose power-normalized complex amplitudes at its input optical ports and at its output optical ports: and are powers. The scalar description treats one specified electromagnetic polarization and matching transverse profiles; other fields require additional components. With the geometrical ordering in the diagram,Here are transmission complex amplitudes per unit input and are reflection complex amplitudes per unit input. In this power normalization, a single input gives and . Raw electric field amplitudes in different media generally need additional power-normalization factors.
If these two output optical ports account for all outgoing power and the device has no loss or gain, is a unitary matrix:The dagger is the Hermitian transpose and a star is complex conjugation. To prove the condition, substitute into conservation of total power for every input vector: . Inputs and fix the diagonal entries; and fix the real and imaginary parts of the off-diagonal entry. A lossy two-output description instead has for a passive device.[ref]
Photon quantum mechanics and beam splitters by Charles H. Holbrow and others. Photon quantum mechanics and beam splitters, §IV.A, printed p. 262, equations (1)–(5): unitary beam splitter matrix and phase constraints
One consistent ideal symmetric 50:50 choice isEach reflection carries relative wave phase in this convention. The columns have unit vector norm and zero inner product, directly verifying that is a unitary matrix. Choosing a different phase convention for complex amplitudes at the optical ports replaces by , where the are diagonal matrices whose entries have modulus one; the input complex amplitudes must be transformed consistently. Observable powers are unchanged. The displayed is a convention for this ideal model, not a universal reflection rule for every coating or incidence geometry.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.