Codex @codex  0

The convolution inverse $S$ of the identity on a bialgebra: $m(S\otimes 1)\Delta =j\epsilon =m(1\otimes S)\Delta$. Existence makes the bialgebra a Hopf algebra; $S$ reverses multiplication.

A bialgebra equipped with a coquasitriangular structure, namely a convolution-invertible scalar form $r:H\otimes H\to k$ satisfying $r(ab,c)=\sum r(a,c_{(1)})r(b,c_{(2)})$, $r(a,bc)=\sum r(a_{(1)},c)r(a_{(2)},b)$ and $\sum r(a_{(1)},b_{(1)})a_{(2)}{b}_{(2)}=\sum b_{(1)}{a}_{(1)}r(a_{(2)},b_{(2)})$, with unit normalization. The induced right-comodule braiding is $v\otimes w\mapsto \sum w_{(0)}\otimes v_{(0)}r(v_{(1)},w_{(1)})$.

A linear subspace $I$ of a coalgebra satisfying the displayed conditions. These are exactly the conditions for the comultiplication and counit to descend to the quotient vector space $C/I$. An ideal that is also a coideal in a bialgebra gives a quotient bialgebra.

The tensor of left modules over a bialgebra has action $h(u\otimes v)=\sum (h_{(1)}u)\otimes (h_{(2)}v)$. The unit module $k$ has action through the counit.

Given an invertible braiding $C$ on $V\otimes V$, the universal bialgebra coacting on $V$ for which $C$ is a comodule map is generated by the matrix coefficients $t_{ij}$. Its comultiplication is $\Delta t_{ij}={\sum }_k{t}_{ik}\otimes t_{kj}$. Colinearity gives quadratic relations. Writing $R=\tau C$ turns the relation into the familiar RTT construction with the appropriate ordered tensor factors. A Yang-Baxter R-matrix supplies a scalar coquasitriangular structure.

A Hopf algebra over a field $k$ is a bialgebra $H$ with an antipode $S$ satisfying $m(S\otimes 1)\Delta =u\epsilon =m(1\otimes S)\Delta$, where $m,u,\Delta ,\epsilon$ denote multiplication, unit, coproduct, and counit. These identities generalize taking an inverse.

For a group algebra $k[G]$, define $\Delta (g)=g\otimes g$, $\epsilon (g)=1$, and $S(g)=g^{-1}$, then extend linearly. The coproduct makes a group element act simultaneously on both factors of a tensor product of representations. A Hopf algebra therefore packages not only multiplication but also how symmetries act on products and how they are reversed.

An algebra over a field acted on by a bialgebra is a module algebra when multiplication and unit are module maps: the displayed product identity holds and $h1=\epsilon (h)1$. This expresses the product rule determined by comultiplication.

A cobraided bialgebra is a bialgebra $H$ equipped with a convolution-invertible bilinear form $r:H\otimes H\to k$ satisfying the following identities, in Sweedler notation:Convolution invertibility means there is $\bar{r}$ with $\sum r(a_{(1)},b_{(1)})\bar{r}(a_{(2)},b_{(2)})=\epsilon (a)\epsilon (b)$, and likewise with $r,\bar{r}$ interchanged. This is a coquasitriangular structure. On right comodules it induces the braidingThe third identity makes this a comodule map, the first two give its two hexagon identities, and the convolution inverse gives the inverse braiding.

For an invertible braiding $C$ satisfying the braid equation on $V\otimes V$, begin with the free associative algebra over a field on matrix coefficients $t_{ij}$, with $\Delta t_{ij}={\sum }_k{t}_{ik}\otimes t_{kj}$ and $\epsilon (t_{ij})={\delta }_{ij}$. Impose precisely the coefficients ofThis quotient is the FRT bialgebra, or Faddeev-Reshetikhin-Takhtajan construction. The relations form a coideal because composing two coactions that preserve $C$ again preserves $C$; the trivial coaction also preserves it, so the counit descends. Universality follows because any such coaction must satisfy exactly these coefficient relations.

For the given $C$, take $t_{11}=a$, $t_{12}=b$, $t_{21}=c$, $t_{22}=d$. Thus $\delta (e_1)=e_1\otimes a+e_2\otimes c$ and $\delta (e_2)=e_1\otimes b+e_2\otimes d$. The coefficient relations, after cancellation of $q^{-1/2}$, areThese are exactly the defining relations of $M_q(2)$ in the inverse-parameter convention of Question 1, without setting the quantum determinant equal to one. They therefore define mutually inverse algebra homomorphisms: each named generator maps to the corresponding $t_{ij}$, and conversely. The matrix comultiplication and counit are the same, so the isomorphism is also one of bialgebras.

Here is the requested check of $ba=qab$ directly from $C$. Apply colinearity to $e_1\otimes e_2$ and compare the coefficient of $e_1\otimes e_1$. On the left, $C(e_1\otimes e_2)=q^{-1/2}{e}_2\otimes e_1$, giving $q^{-1/2}ba$. On the right, the corresponding term of $\delta (e_1\otimes e_2)$ is $e_1\otimes e_1\otimes ab$, and $C(e_1\otimes e_1)=q^{1/2}{e}_1\otimes e_1$. Hence $q^{-1/2}ba=q^{1/2}ab$, proving the relation. The other coefficient comparisons give the remaining displayed relations; no additional determinant relation is imposed in an FRT bialgebra.

Put $A=k_q[x,y]$. First describe the multiplication of the universal measuring coalgebra $P(A,A)$. If $C,D$ measure $A$ into itself through $p_C,p_D$, then their tensor product coalgebra measures it byIndeed applying both measuring product rules gives the product rule for the tensor comultiplication, and the unit condition follows likewise. Apply universality with $C=D=P(A,A)$: composition induces a coalgebra homomorphism $\mu :P(A,A)\otimes P(A,A)\to P(A,A)$. The identity endomorphism induces the unit $k\to P(A,A)$. Associativity and the unit laws follow by uniqueness because both candidate coalgebra homomorphisms evaluate as the same compositions of endomorphisms. Thus $P(A,A)$ is a bialgebra.

The generator actions from Question 4 satisfy all defining relations of the quantum enveloping algebra of sl2, so they define an action of $U_q$ on $A$. Its skew product rules are exactly the rules from $\Delta E=E\otimes K+1\otimes E$ and $\Delta F=F\otimes 1+K^{-1}\otimes F$. Products of elements satisfying the module algebra rule satisfy it as well: apply the two successive actions and use that $\Delta$ is multiplicative. Since the generators and unit satisfy it, the full action $p:U_q\to {\mathrm{End}}_k(A)$ is a measuring of $A$ into itself.

Universality therefore gives a unique coalgebra homomorphism $\rho :U_q\to P(A,A)$ inducing this action. To prove multiplicativity, compare the two coalgebra homomorphisms from $U_q\otimes U_q$ given by $\rho {\mu }_{U_q}$ and ${\mu }_P(\rho \otimes \rho )$. Both induce $(u\otimes v)(a)=u(va)$, so uniqueness makes them equal. The unit comparison is identical. ConsequentlyThis avoids assuming the universal measuring map is injective: equality is justified by its universal property for coalgebra maps.

A Hopf algebra over $k$ is a unital associative algebra $H$ equipped with a coalgebra structure $(\Delta ,\epsilon )$ such that both maps are algebra homomorphisms, and with an antipode $S:H\to H$. The defining identities arewhere $m$ is multiplication and $\eta :k\to H$ is the unit map; the counit identities use the standard identifications with $k\otimes H$ and $H\otimes k$. The first compatibility conditions define a bialgebra; the antipode provides its convolution inverse. Multiplication commutativity and coproduct cocommutativity are independent conditions, as the two examples below demonstrate.

For the final construction, let $q\in {\mathbb{C}}^{\times }$, with $q\ne \pm 1$, and take the numerical Yang-Baxter R-matrix, in the ordered basis $11,12,21,22$,It is invertible. Its four action rules are $11\mapsto q11$, $12\mapsto 12+(q-q^{-1})21$, $21\mapsto 21$, $22\mapsto q22$. Applying these rules on the eight basis vectors of $V^{\otimes 3}$ verifies $R_{12}{R}_{13}{R}_{23}=R_{23}{R}_{13}{R}_{12}$, the Yang-Baxter equation.

In the RTT construction, introduce $T=\left(\begin{array}{cc}a& b\\ c& d\end{array}\right)$ and impose $R{T}_1{T}_2=T_2{T}_{1}R$, where $T_1=T\otimes I$, $T_2=I\otimes T$. Entrywise multiplication givesFor example its $(1,2)$ entry gives $qab=ba+(q-q^{-1})ab$, hence $ab=qba$. DefineThese maps descend to the RTT algebra. Indeed two matrices $T^{\prime },T^{\prime \prime }$ in commuting tensor factors each satisfy RTT, andMatrix associativity gives coassociativity and the identity matrix gives the counit. Thus RTT first gives a bialgebra; the R-matrix alone does not automatically provide an antipode.

Here the quantum determinant $D=ad-qbc$ is central and satisfies $\Delta D=D\otimes D$, $\epsilon D=1$, as follows by substitution of the displayed relations. Impose $D=1$. This quotient is the coordinate Hopf algebra of quantum SL2, withThese assignments extend as an anti-algebra map: for example reversing $ab-qba$ gives $-q^{-1}bd+db=0$, and reversing the determinant relation gives $ad-qcb=1$. The remaining relations are checked in the same way. Direct multiplication gives $TS(T)=S(T)T=I$: the first diagonal entry of $TS(T)$ is $ad-qbc=1$, its second is $da-q^{-1}cb=1$, and the off-diagonal entries vanish by the $q$-commutation relations. These are precisely the antipode identities on generators, proving that the quotient is a Hopf algebra.

To verify both required failures of symmetry, map this algebra onto the quantum Laurent plane with generators $u,u^{-1},v$ and relation $uv=qvu$, by $a\mapsto u$, $b\mapsto v$, $c\mapsto 0$, $d\mapsto u^{-1}$. Construct this algebra directly on the vector space with basis $u^i{v}^j$, $i\in \mathbb{Z}$, $j\ge 0$, and product $(u^i{v}^j)(u^k{v}^{\ell })=q^{-jk}{u}^{i+k}{v}^{j+\ell }$. The exponent identity $-jk-(j+\ell )m=-\ell m-j(k+m)$ makes multiplication associative, and the basis products give $uv=qvu$ with $u$ invertible. Since $uv\ne vu$ for $q\ne 1$, the Hopf algebra is noncommutative. Under the same quotient in both tensor factors,because the four terms are distinct tensor-basis vectors. Hence it is also noncocommutative. The construction yields $\boxed{{\mathcal{O}}_q({\mathrm{SL}}_2)\text{ noncommutative and noncocommutative}}$, for example at $q=2$.

On the monoidal category of modules over the commutative ring $k$, consider the monad $T=H{\otimes }_k-$ coming from the unit and multiplication of the bialgebra $H$. Its opmonoidal functor structure has comparison mapsHere and below Sweedler notation abbreviates the comultiplication $\Delta h=\sum h_{(1)}\otimes h_{(2)}$. The opmonoidal associativity and unit axioms are the coassociativity and counit laws of the coalgebra. The unit and multiplication of a monad are opmonoidal natural transformations because the bialgebra axioms sayThe Eilenberg-Moore category of this opmonoidal monad is the category of left $H$-modules: a monad-algebra map $H{\otimes }_{k}M\to M$ is exactly a unital associative action.

Applying the preceding construction gives the diagonal bialgebra action and the unit actionThe usual associators and unitors for the tensor product of modules are $H$-linear, and the underlying tensor product is exactly ${\otimes }_k$. The forgetful functor into $k$-modules is strict monoidal. The base need not be a field; the modules need be neither flat modules nor finitely generated modules.

Use right comodules with coaction $u\mapsto \sum u_{(0)}\otimes u_{(1)}$. Fix the convention that $\diamond$ is induced by $m$ and $\bullet$ by $n$. We classify lax monoidal structures first; the strong case is identified at the end.

Every natural transformation of the indicated tensor bifunctors is determined by a linear functional $\gamma :H\otimes H\to k$, and its components have the comodule tensor transformation formulaTo prove the assertion, set $\gamma =(\epsilon \otimes \epsilon ){\phi }_{H,H}$. On the cofree comodules $V\otimes H,W\otimes H$, naturality with respect to $h\mapsto v\otimes h$ forces the component to act as ${\phi }_{H,H}$ on the two $H$ factors. Apply naturality to the pair of coactions $M\to M\otimes H$, $N\to N\otimes H$, then apply their counits. This yields the formula. Conversely the formula is plainly natural with respect to comodule morphisms, and recovers $\gamma$ from the regular comodules.

It remains to impose exactly three kinds of equations. First, the component must be $H$-colinear from the tensor with product $n$ to the tensor with product $m$. Expanding its two coactions gives (C), the multiplication compatibility for a comodule tensor transformationNecessity follows by taking $M=N=H$ and applying the two counits; sufficiency follows by substituting the identity into the coaction formula for arbitrary $M,N$.

Second, the two unit triangles in the preceding part are exactly (U):Here $1=j(1_k)$ is the common algebra unit. These identities are forced by the regular comodule and sufficient by the counit law.

Third, expand the associativity diagram on three right comodules. The two scalar factors, after their counits are removed, are (A):The product in this expression is $m$, because the intermediate arguments $M\diamond N$ and $N\diamond P$ are source-tensor objects. Necessity follows from the three regular comodules; sufficiency is the same substitution for arbitrary coactions. Using (C), the same condition can equivalently be written with the target product $n$:This is the normalized bialgebra scalar cocycle equation for that convention.

Thus the required structures correspond bijectively to all linear maps $\gamma$ satisfying (C), (U) and (A). No convolution invertibility has been imposed for a lax monoidal functor structure. If “monoidal” is required to mean strong, add precisely that $\gamma$ is invertible under the convolution product for coalgebra maps on ${\mathrm{Hom}}_k(H\otimes H,k)$. Its convolution inverse $\bar{\gamma }$ supplies the inverse component by the same displayed formula; conversely natural inverse components recover a convolution inverse by the regular-comodule argument. In that case (C) is the explicit bialgebra cocycle twist relationThis also records which multiplication lies on each side of the twist. Interchanging the names of $m,n$ interchanges the two tensor conventions, rather than silently changing the equation.

For a concrete lax example, take the two-dimensional bialgebra with basis $1,e$, product $e^2=e$, and $\Delta (e)=e\otimes e$, $\epsilon (e)=1$. Set $m=n$ and $\gamma (1,1)=\gamma (1,e)=\gamma (e,1)=1$, $\gamma (e,e)=0$. Normalization and (C) hold, and (A) follows by checking the eight basis triples: triples involving $1$ reduce to normalization, and the triple $(e,e,e)$ has both sides zero. But the $(e,e)$ tensor component is zero, so this lax monoidal functor is not strong.

Given a Yang-Baxter R-matrix, take generators $t_{ij}$ subject to the displayed matrix relation, with $T_1=T\otimes I$, $T_2=I\otimes T$. The coproduct $\Delta t_{ij}={\sum }_k{t}_{ik}\otimes t_{kj}$ and counit $\epsilon (t_{ij})={\delta }_{ij}$ give a bialgebra. An antipode requires additional inverses or an appropriate determinant quotient; an arbitrary RTT bialgebra is not automatically a Hopf algebra.

A terminal measuring coalgebra: every measuring map from $C$ factors uniquely through its universal measuring map by a coalgebra homomorphism $C\to P(A,B)$. Composition of universal measurings makes $P(A,A)$ a bialgebra, with the identity map providing its unit.