Let . The Brownian reflection principle gives
Here is the reflection argument: on paths that hit before , reflect all increments after their first hitting time. The Strong Markov property gives independent Brownian motion after that time, whose sign can be reversed without changing its law. This exchanges paths ending below with paths ending above . The latter have necessarily hit , and the endpoint has no atom at , giving the displayed equality. It also shows that has a continuous distribution at every positive level.
Writing for the standard normal distribution function, the probability of staying below the barrier is therefore
Since as , the Brownian barrier survival asymptotic is
Any smaller exponent gives a zero limit and any larger exponent gives an infinite limit, so this is the unique exponent producing a finite positive constant.
For the simple symmetric random walk, the increments have mean and variance . Use the polygonal interpolation from (b). The maximum functional is Lipschitz in the supremum norm, since
Each interpolating segment is linear, so its maximum occurs at a grid endpoint. The continuous mapping theorem applied to the Donsker invariance principle gives
The limiting maximum has no atom at by the Brownian reflection principle, so the closed-tail probabilities converge at this threshold. Including does not change the event because . Therefore the random-walk maximum limit from Donsker invariance is
Here is the standard normal distribution function. The normalization and the positive-threshold condition are those in the PDF; the TeX aid's is not the printed expression.
For , put . Fix and , and set
for large enough that . The Brownian reflection principle and the Gaussian tail estimate give
Since , the sum of these probabilities is finite. The Borel-Cantelli first lemma implies that, almost surely, for all sufficiently large ,
Now take . The function is increasing for , so
Here the positive upper bound for can first be divided by , and the denominator can then be bounded below by ; this remains valid even when . Moreover,
Thus, for each fixed pair ,
Use the countable choices and , intersect their probability-one events, and let . This proves the Brownian upper law of the iterated logarithm:
Only large times are involved. The hint's related monotonicity assertion for is also valid eventually: the derivative of is , which is negative for . No monotonicity at the small-time edge of the logarithmic expression is required.
First prove the strong law for Brownian motion, with probability one. For each , the Gaussian tail bound gives
By stationary increments and the Brownian reflection principle, followed by the same tail bound,
Both bounds are summable in . The First Borel-Cantelli lemma therefore implies that, eventually, both quantities inside these probability events are at most . For this gives . Intersect over a sequence of positive rational tending to zero to obtain the asserted continuous-time limit.
On this one almost sure event,
so for and to for . For each real , the path is eventually strictly on the corresponding side of . Hence
The same event works simultaneously for all levels , giving the requested transience of Brownian motion with drift.
Put . Because is the maximum on ,
The preceding part makes this a strictly positive random interval with probability one. A standard Brownian motion cannot have this path property. For each deterministic , the Brownian reflection principle gives . Taking the countable union over shows that the probability of staying nonpositive on any initial interval of positive length is zero.
Therefore is not a Brownian motion. This is the obstruction for Brownian motion shifted at its finite-horizon maximum. It concerns its path law, irrespective of any proposed filtration for the shifted process.
Continuity ensures that the maximum on is attained, so its first attainment time lies in . To exclude the endpoint, use Brownian time reversal on a finite interval:
This is a standard Brownian motion on this interval. Indeed, its increments are increments of on disjoint intervals taken in reverse order, hence are independent centered normal variables with the required variances, and its paths are continuous.
If is the maximum, then for every . But by the Brownian reflection principle and symmetry,
the running maximum of has the distribution of , whose probability of being zero is zero. In particular the event has probability zero. Thus with probability one. Uniqueness of the maximizing time is not needed for this proof.
Use the Donsker invariance principle: for independent and identically distributed random variables of mean zero and variance one, the linearly interpolated processes with converge in distribution to standard Brownian motion in with the uniform topology. No moment beyond the finite second moment is required.
The maximum functional is continuous, since . A linear function on each interpolation interval has its maximum at an endpoint, so . The continuous mapping theorem therefore gives
By the Brownian reflection principle, the limiting random variable has the distribution of , . Its distribution function is continuous and has no atom at any , so convergence in distribution permits passage to these tail probabilities. Hence
At the left side is exactly one for every , because is included in the maximum, and the right side is also one.