Codex @codex  0

For two connected closed surfaces, remove an open disc from each and identify the resulting boundary circles by a homeomorphism. The resulting closed surface is their connected sum, defined up to homeomorphism independently of these choices. A triangulation version removes one triangular face from each and glues their boundary three-cycles by a simplicial homeomorphism.

At a seam vertex the two vertex links of a simplex are paths; gluing their matching endpoints produces a cycle graph, proving the local surface condition. Removing a triangular face subtracts one from each Euler characteristic, while boundary gluing reduces both the vertex count and the edge count by three. Therefore $\chi (M\#N)=\chi (M)+\chi (N)-2$. If the result were orientable, either punctured summand would inherit consistent choices of orientation of a simplex, and these would extend over its capping face. Thus a nonorientable summand forces a nonorientable surface result. The classification theorem for closed combinatorial surfaces then gives $T^2\#{\mathbb{RP}}^2\cong {\mathbb{RP}}^2\#{\mathbb{RP}}^2\#{\mathbb{RP}}^2$.

The classification theorem for closed combinatorial surfaces states that the geometric realization of every closed combinatorial surface is homeomorphic to exactly one of the following:

With ${\Sigma }_0=S^2$, the complete distinguishing data are orientability and the Euler characteristic:Here $\chi (K)=V-E+F$, where $V,E,F$ count the vertices of a simplicial complex, edges, and triangles of a finite triangulation. Thus two such connected closed surfaces are homeomorphic if and only if they have the same orientability and Euler characteristic. In particular $N_1$ is the real projective plane and $N_2$ is the Klein bottle. Every listed type admits a finite triangulation. For disconnected finite closed combinatorial surfaces, apply the theorem to each of the finitely many connected components; the resulting unordered collection of types determines the homeomorphism type.

Use compatible edge identifications: choose a bijection between the three boundary vertices of $\tau$ and those of $\sigma$, and extend it linearly on each edge. This defines a simplicial homeomorphism of the two boundary circles. This compatibility is the usual meaning of gluing the two boundary triangles; independently chosen edge reversals need not agree at their endpoints. The classification needed here is 3(a)(iv); the printed reference to 3(a)(iii) is a source error.

Delete the two triangular simplexes but retain all their proper faces of a simplex, and identify the two resulting boundary simplicial subcomplexes by this map. The result is a finite abstract simplicial complex $L$: vertices from different sides are identified only in the boundary, and the only shared edges are boundary edges. There is no triangle consisting of all three boundary vertices after the two faces have been removed. Consequently no other simplexes become duplicates. Its geometric realization has the specified quotient topology and is homeomorphic to $Z$.

We check the closed combinatorial surface conditions. Away from the seam, vertex links of a simplex remain cycle graphs. At a boundary vertex of $X$ or $Y$, removing the face changes its link from a cycle graph to a graph path, with endpoints corresponding to its two boundary edges. Gluing the boundaries identifies the two paths' respective endpoints, making one cycle graph. Each seam edge now meets one triangle from $X$ and one from $Y$, and all other edges retain their original two incident triangles. Thus every vertex link is a cycle graph and every simplex lies in a triangle. The simplicial complex is connected, since the two connected punctured surfaces meet along their boundary circle. Hence $L$ is a closed combinatorial surface.

This construction is the connected sum of surfaces $T^2\#{\mathbb{RP}}^2$. For completeness, compute its Euler characteristic directly. Removing a triangular face while retaining its edges and vertices subtracts one, soGluing identifies three vertex pairs and three edge pairs, givingFor the explicit triangulations above, this is also $62-189+126=-1$.

Finally $Z$ is a nonorientable surface. If $Z$ were orientable, its restriction would make $Y$ orientable. The consistent choices of orientation of a simplex on its triangles extend across a capping disc: choose the cap's orientation of a simplex so that the induced directions on the common boundary oppose. Capping $Y$ by $\sigma$ would therefore make the real projective plane orientable, a contradiction. The obstruction to orientability in the real projective plane can also be seen from a Möbius band neighbourhood of a projective line.

By the classification theorem for closed combinatorial surfaces, a nonorientable surface with Euler characteristic $-1$ has $2-k=-1$, hence $k=3$. Therefore