Write for the maximum cardinality of a subset of containing no nonconstant three-term arithmetic progression. There is an absolute constant such that every three-term-progression-free subset satisfies for . A quantitative Roth density-increment step gives, for subset density and , a arithmetic progression of length at least and increased subset density at least . The increment decreases reciprocal subset density by at least , so fewer than iterations are possible. If is the successive length, then , using the initial subset density to bound all later ones. Hence . If exceeds a sufficiently large absolute constant, all these intervals remain above the density increment threshold, a contradiction. This proves the displayed bound. The result is a classical quantitative version of Roth theorem on three-term arithmetic progressions, without asserting an optimal bound.
Meshulam bound for cap sets 2026-10-06
A cap set in has subset density . A Fourier analysis on a finite abelian group proof uses a hyperplane density increment for cap sets repeatedly: absence of nondiagonal zero-sum triples forces a large finite abelian Fourier coefficient, and hence a denser slice. This is a weaker bound than the Ellenberg–Gijswijt cap-set bound, but illustrates the density increment method.
For an indicator function of a subset of with subset density , a large Fourier coefficient of gives a density increment on an arithmetic progression. The Dirichlet approximation theorem supplies a step on which the detected linear phase changes slowly. Split its residue classes into progressions of lengths comparable to . Replacing the phase by one constant on each cell preserves a fixed fraction of the Fourier correlation. Since the balanced function has total sum zero, positive discrepancies sum to half the total absolute discrepancy; one cell has the displayed increased density. One may take when is sufficiently large in terms of .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2003 iii Paper 25 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
We prove the three-term Roth theorem by a density increment, keeping the interval boundary rather than replacing the interval by a cyclic group with a different density. The case is vacuous; assume .
We first prove the following alternative with absolute constants : if has density and no nonconstant three-term arithmetic progression, and , then some integer progression hasFor this purpose take , so for large and are invertible modulo . On , put , , and . In particular , and vanishes outside the interval. Use normalized Fourier coefficients on a finite abelian group, . Character orthogonality, obtained by summing a finite geometric series, gives Fourier inversion on a finite group and Parseval identity on a finite group.
For these identities giveThere is no wrapping ambiguity when all three entries lie in : the integer has absolute value below , so a modular relation is an integer relation. If no nonconstant progression exists, . Meanwhile the choices and give for sufficiently large .
Expand the difference by telescoping,If , each term on the right has modulus at most . Indeed multiplication of frequencies by permutes them, and Cauchy-Schwarz with Parseval identity bounds the two other Fourier factors by their norms; each squared norm is at most . For , the diagonal count is less than half the main density term. ThereforeIn particular there is a nonzero frequency withThe frequency is nonzero because .
Here is the conversion of this coefficient into a density increment. Put . Of the numbers modulo one, two lie in the same one of equal arcs. Their difference gives with , where . This is the needed Dirichlet approximation theorem, proved by the pigeonhole principle.
Partition each residue class modulo in into consecutive progressions of length , leaving its final short tail. Their total tail size is at most . On each full progression the character differs from its value at the first point by at most . Hence removing tails and replacing the character by its initial value showsThe sum of over all full progressions is the negative of its sum over the tails, so its absolute value is at most . Consequently the sum of the positive block sums is at least . Since these blocks contain at most points in total, at least one has average at least . It gives a density increment at least . For with a sufficiently large absolute , . This proves the alternative, with one small common absolute .
Reidentify with by its affine parametrization. Absence of a nonconstant progression is preserved, while density increases. At every step the density is at least the original , so the increment is at least and the new interval length is at least . After at most steps, the density would exceed one. Choose the original so large that the length stays above throughout these finitely many steps. Such a choice exists explicitly by working backwards: a required next length is ensured by previous length at least . The alternative could then be applied at every step, giving a contradiction. ThusThis is the Roth density increment on an integer progression proof.
For the pattern with offsets , replace the counting functional by . Its Fourier expression iscoming from the relation . Both multipliers are invertible modulo the chosen , so exactly the same Parseval estimates apply. This relation has no wrap in , since its magnitude is at most , and the earlier restricted choices of still give a fixed positive density main term. The same increment and iteration find a nonconstant triple . Negative is allowed, as requested, and the affine reparametrization used in the iteration preserves this pattern as well.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 iii Paper 88 2 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A quantitative form of Roth theorem on three-term arithmetic progressions is: there is an absolute constant such that, for , every with no nonconstant three-term arithmetic progression satisfiesAll logarithms below are natural. We prove the classical Roth bound for three-term progressions with an unoptimized . The empty set is immediate; write .
First establish a quantitative density increment. Suppose . Put , embed in , and extend all interval functions by zero. Let , and , the balanced subset indicator. DefineThe relation in the sum is modulo . For interval elements its integer discrepancy has absolute value less than , so it is precisely the integer relation. Thus . The full interval count is the number of endpoint pairs of the same parity:Consequently, since ,
Orthogonality of the additive characters givesBoth identities follow by expanding the sums and using for in , and zero otherwise; the latter follows from a finite geometric series. Since is odd, permutes the frequencies. Telescope the difference asThe Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and the displayed Parseval identity on a finite group bound each term by . Indeed, and , so every product of the two remaining L2 norms is at most . HenceThe zero coefficient vanishes because , so choose a nonzero frequency giving this bound.
Let . The pigeonhole principle applied to the fractional parts in intervals gives an integer with . Partition each residue class modulo in into consecutive arithmetic progressions of exactlyelements, leaving fewer than remainder points per residue. The total remainder has size at most . The size hypothesis gives . On a full arithmetic progression , the phase varies from its value at the first point by at most .
Let . Replacing the phase by its first value on each full arithmetic progression and estimating the remainder using givesAlso . Therefore the sum of the positive isSince the total length of these arithmetic progressions is at most , at least one has . Thus the step just proved isAn affine map taking this arithmetic progression to preserves the absence of nonconstant three-term arithmetic progressions.
Now iterate. Write for successive lengths and subset densities, with and . Since every subset density is at most one,Consequently successful steps are impossible. On the other hand, subset densities never decrease, so with ,Suppose . Since ,Let . We have . Therefore every length through step satisfies , and hence . The density increment lemma remains applicable for all steps, contradicting the reciprocal-density bound.
Thus , proving the boxed theorem. The proof includes the Fourier analysis on a finite abelian group detection, conversion to an integer arithmetic progression, and the length bookkeeping that produces the double logarithm.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 iii Paper 16 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
We prove the Roth theorem on three-term arithmetic progressions by a density increment on an ordinary integer arithmetic progression. The required increment will be small, but depend only on the current subset density.
First establish the increment step. Suppose has subset density and no nonconstant three-term arithmetic progression. Put , regard as a subset of the cyclic group , and set . Then and . Use the normalized Fourier coefficient on a finite abelian groupThe character orthogonality geometric-series identity for and zero otherwise gives Fourier inversion on a finite group, Parseval identity on a finite group, andSince is odd, multiplication by two permutes its frequencies. If one argument is and the other two have absolute value at most one, Cauchy-Schwarz and the Parseval identity on a finite group give .
A modular arithmetic progression whose three entries lie in satisfies the corresponding integer equation: the absolute value of is less than , so congruence to zero forces equality. Thus , since only constant arithmetic progressions remain. Meanwhile, the choices and give at least arithmetic progressions in for . As , this gives . Expand . The seven terms other than the main term are each bounded by . For ,Consequently a nonzero frequency obeys , where . It is nonzero because .
We turn this coefficient into a local increase. Let . Partition the unit circle into equal intervals and consider the points , , modulo one. Two occupy the same interval, yielding an integer with . Set . If exceeds a sufficiently large absolute multiple of , then and each residue-class arithmetic progression of step in has at least terms. Partition each into pieces of lengths between and , distributing the final remainder among the pieces.
On each such arithmetic progression , the character of a finite abelian group differs from its value at the first point by at most . Write . Thereforeso . But , and hence the sum of the positive is at least . Some piece must consequently satisfy . On that piece,Also, once , . This proves the one-frequency density increment on an integer interval: for absolute constants , if , there is a arithmetic progression of length at least on which the subset density rises by at least . For example one may decrease to and choose large enough for the displayed elementary inequalities.
Now fix and suppose the required conclusion fails. On each new arithmetic progression, identify its points in order with . This affine identification preserves all integer arithmetic progressions, so its copy of is still progression-free. All densities remain at least . Put , , and choose an integer . Every increment raises the subset density by at least and changes the length by . Iterating the latter inequality givesChoose . Then every length up to step exceeds , so every increment is available. After increments the subset density exceeds one, a contradiction. ThusFor there are no sets satisfying the subset density assumption. The argument above proves the substantive case without invoking the theorem being asked for.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 11 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The Roth theorem on three-term arithmetic progressions says that, for every , every sufficiently long integer interval contains a nonconstant three-term arithmetic progression in every subset of subset density at least . We prove this by a density increment, giving the intermediate Fourier and partition arguments.
Let have subset density and contain no nonconstant three-term arithmetic progression. Embed in the odd-order cyclic group , where , and extend its indicator function by zero. Use normalized Fourier coefficients on a finite abelian groupFor the normalized progression count,the orthogonality of characters and Fourier inversion giveThere is no modular wraparound when , since both and lie between and . Only constant progressions occur in , so . In the interval , endpoints of the same parity have an integer midpoint, giving at least ordered progressions.
Put and , so . If , the difference in progression counts satisfiesTelescope the difference in the other order as . By Parseval identity and the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, each term has absolute value at mostIndeed , , and multiplication by permutes the frequencies because is odd. It follows that a nonzero frequency satisfiesThus the unnormalized Fourier correlation has absolute value at least .
Write and . To prove the needed case of the Dirichlet approximation theorem, place the fractional parts in equal subintervals of . The pigeonhole principle gives with . Set and , taking large enough that . Every residue-class chain in of step has length at least . Divide each chain into blocks of length , adjoining a final shorter remainder to its preceding block. This partitions into arithmetic progressions with .
The linear phase varies by at most on each cell. Replace it there by its value at one endpoint. Since , the total error in the Fourier correlation is at most . Consequently, writing ,But , so the positive discrepancies sum to at least . Some cell therefore has . As and , this proves the one-frequency density increment on an integer interval:
Finally, reindex this arithmetic progression as a new integer interval. An affine reindexing preserves three-term arithmetic progressions, so the new subset is again progression-free. Starting with density at least , each step raises it by at least and retains an interval of length at least , where .
Let be a size threshold large enough for all the preceding estimates. It works at every later density . Choose and initial size at least . After steps the size is at leastThus all increments are permitted. They would give density at least , a contradiction. This proves the Roth theorem on three-term arithmetic progressions.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 79 1 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
The Roth theorem on three-term arithmetic progressions says that, for each fixed , a sufficiently long interval cannot have a subset of density of a finite subset at least with no nonconstant three-term arithmetic progression. Equivalently, the maximum size of a three-term-progression-free subset of is . Here is a density increment proof, including its analytic ingredients.
Write and embed into the cyclic group of order . For normalized Fourier analysis on a finite abelian group take . The orthogonality of complex exponentials follows from a finite geometric series: its average is zero for a nonzero frequency and one for frequency zero. Expanding in these linear phases consequently proves both Fourier inversion on a finite group and the Parseval identity on a finite group. In particular,The second identity follows by summing the frequency expansion over : the two constraints leave precisely the frequencies . Since is odd, multiplication by two permutes the frequencies. Also a congruence with is an equality in the integers, since .
Let have subset density , and suppose it contains no nonconstant three-term arithmetic progression. Its balanced indicator function of a finite subset is , extended by zero outside . Then . Counting endpoints with the same parity givesIf , their difference in absolute value is at least . Telescope the difference of the products into three terms, each containing and two factors chosen from . Put . The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and the Parseval identity on a finite group bound each term by , since the squared normalized norm of either other factor is at most . Therefore some nonzero frequency satisfiesThis is the Fourier detection of a progression-free subset of an interval step; it has just been proved rather than assumed.
We now turn this Fourier coefficient on a finite abelian group into a density increment. Set . Partition the unit interval into equal pieces and place the fractional parts of in them. The pigeonhole principle gives with . This proves the particular Dirichlet approximation theorem needed here. Put and . For sufficiently large depending only on , and . Each residue chain modulo in has at least elements. Split each such chain into arithmetic progressions with between and elements, absorbing its final short remainder into the previous block.
The linear phase changes by at most within any block. Freezing the linear phase at the first element of each block therefore changes the preceding correlation by at most , because . The triangle inequality givesThe block sums of the balanced indicator function of a finite subset add to zero, so their positive total is half their absolute total. Some block consequently satisfiesHere is absolute, and shrinking it absorbs the floors. An affine parametrization of identifies with a subset of and preserves arithmetic progressions.
Repeat this Roth density-increment step. Every step raises the subset density by at least , so fewer than steps are possible. All the lengths satisfy while above a threshold depending only on . Choose the initial so large that this lower recursion stays above that threshold for steps; this is possible by working backwards through finitely many squarings. We would then force a subset density greater than one. Thus every fixed positive density eventually forces a nonconstant three-term arithmetic progression. For an infinite subset of the positive integers with positive upper asymptotic density, apply the finite conclusion along initial intervals whose subset density is bounded away from zero; this gives the usual infinite formulation as well.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 79 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
A clean proof outline uses hypergraph removal rather than the quadratic density increment route. The structure is: establish removal for the three-uniform tetrahedron, encode four-term arithmetic progressions as its copies, and use the many edge-disjoint copies coming from constant progressions to contradict removal. We give the technical regularity stage in outline, as requested, and prove the counting inequality and the encoding that make the argument work.
The needed tetrahedron removal lemma says that for each there is such that a three-uniform hypergraph on vertices with fewer than copies of can be made -free by removing fewer than hyperedges. Equivalently, being a fixed positive edge-edit distance from -free forces a positive fourth-power copy count. Constants and whether copies are ordered are immaterial after rescaling .
Here is the global proof of this hypergraph removal input. Strong regularity for three-uniform hypergraphs partitions both vertices and the bipartite pair sets between vertex classes. The resulting three-class cells, called triads in a hypergraph regularity partition, are supported on three pair cells. On all but a prescribed small total weight, the triple-edge function has approximately constant relative density and a small relative three-dimensional box norm. This two-level refinement is essential: a vertex partition alone does not capture correlations carried by pairs. The regularity construction uses the squared L2 norms of conditional expectations of edge indicators as bounded energies. Refinement increases this energy by the squared L2 norm of the difference between the new and old conditional expectations, by orthogonality. Thus a nonuniformity witness causing a definite discrepancy causes a definite energy increment. A witness to nonuniformity refines the relevant pair or triple partition and raises the appropriate energy. A hierarchy of tolerances, with sufficiently strong refinement at the pair level, makes these increases terminate after a bounded number of stages. Bounds may depend very badly on the requested tolerance, which is harmless for a qualitative theorem.
Delete hyperedges with two vertices in the same vertex class, hyperedges meeting exceptional classes or irregular cells, hyperedges supported on pair cells of very small density, and hyperedges in triads of very small triple density. Choose the cutoffs and error hierarchy so that the total deleted is less than . A surviving selects four vertex classes, six pair cells and four triads with all required densities above their cutoffs. The relative tetrahedron counting lemma gives at least copies in those cells. This contradicts the assumed sparse copy count, and proves the tetrahedron removal lemma. The strong regularity and relative counting estimates are the technical portion outlined here; the dependence of their constants is not needed.
To show the key analytic mechanism in that counting step, define the three-dimensional box norm of a complex function on bywhere denotes complex conjugation. If the other three functions are bounded by one, thenFor a proof, fix first. Apply the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality over to remove , duplicating . Next apply the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality over the variables other than to remove the two factors from , duplicating . A third application removes the four factors from and duplicates . The resulting eighth power is exactly the cube average displayed above. Averaging over proves the inequality. This also shows nonnegativity of the cube average by its successive squared-sum form.
For example, on complete pair supports, if four triple-edge functions have constant parts and , telescope the fourfold product and apply this inequality to each term. Their hypergraph clique density differs from by at most , so it is positive when . On general pair supports the same successive squaring argument is combined with sufficiently regular pair cells; choosing relative errors small compared with the pair-density product gives the relative tetrahedron counting lemma. This explains both the counting step and why its support must be regularized before the triple-edge densities. It supplies a proved important step without pretending that the strong regularity theorem is a one-line assertion.
We now prove the four-term progression hypergraph encoding completely. Let have subset density at least , choose , and take four disjoint copies of the cyclic group . Put a hyperedge on the three vertices excluding part precisely whenFor a transversal quadruple let and . Its four edge conditions are , . Thus a gives a four-term arithmetic progression with common difference modulo .
Suppose has no nonconstant four-term arithmetic progression in the integers. A modular progression lying in must also be an integer progression: each consecutive second difference has absolute value less than , so its congruence to zero is an equality. Therefore every in this hypergraph has , and all four values equal some . For each , the system , has exactly solutions: choose , solve first for , and then for . There are exactly copies of .
These copies are edge-disjoint. Indeed, an edge missing part has exactly one completion with , obtained by setting . Its common value is the already prescribed . Hence destroying all copies requires at least edge deletions. Since , this is at least . Apply the tetrahedron removal lemma to the vertices with, for instance, . It would permit fewer than deletions once is large: the copy count is eventually below its fixed threshold . This is impossible.
Every fixed positive density therefore forces a nonconstant four-term arithmetic progression in sufficiently long intervals. This proves the length-four case of the Szemerédi theorem. Applying it to sufficiently large initial intervals along a subsequence witnessing positive upper asymptotic density also gives the usual infinite-set formulation.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 111 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
A sufficient absolute constant is . The proof is a density increment argument for a cap set over the finite field .
First work in , write , and let be the indicator function of a cap set of subset density . All expectations below are uniform. In characteristic three, a solution of having two equal entries has all three equal. Consequently the normalized linear configuration count isSet and use Fourier analysis on a finite abelian group withThe orthogonality of roots of unity and the Parseval identity on a finite group giveIf , then for a cap set andThus some nonzero finite abelian Fourier coefficient has magnitude at least .
For this , let be the subset density of on the affine subspace , for . These three affine subspaces have equal cardinality, andAmong three directions separated by , one makes an angle at most with any given complex number. Hence . Restricting to that hyperplane gives the hyperplane density increment for cap setsTranslate the affine subspace to its underlying vector space. This preserves the cap set property: translating a triple by changes its sum by . The same argument can therefore be iterated.
For completeness, the density increment iteration gives an explicit uniform bound. If , the hypothesis is impossible. Suppose and a cap set has . For every integer , its remaining dimension is at least , and its current subset density is at least . ThusThe last inequality holds at and remains true as increases: the successive ratio of is for . At each step, as long as the subset density remains at most one,After steps this would implya contradiction. The endpoint already contradicts the cap set property in positive dimension. This proves the claimed existence of three distinct points and the Meshulam bound for cap sets.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 129 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Use the usual convention that a three-term arithmetic progression must be nonconstant. There is a genuine small-case defect in the printed statement: for , , and , neither conclusion can hold with . We prove the intended Roth density-increment step for every odd integer , including the small values of , rather than silently treating as covered. Counting constant arithmetic progressions would make the first alternative vacuous for every nonempty .
Suppose that has no nonconstant three-term arithmetic progression, and let be its actual density of a finite subset. Thus . Put , , and embed in the cyclic group . A congruence with is an equality over the integers, since . Thus this embedding creates no extra three-term arithmetic progressions. Since is odd, multiplication by two permutes .
Use normalized Fourier analysis on a finite abelian group, with and . For the normalized trilinear arithmetic progression count, character orthogonality givesIndeed, expanding each function in its inverse Fourier transform, averaging in forces , and averaging in then forces . The Parseval identity in this normalization is .
Let , , and , the balanced indicator function of a finite subset. Then . Only constant arithmetic progressions contribute to , whereas summing over centers counts ordered three-term arithmetic progressions in . HenceSet . Telescope by changing one factor at a time:In the Fourier transform formula for each term, bound the Fourier coefficient of by and apply the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality to the other two factors. The permutation preserves the required squared sums. Since and , this givesIf , then , so the difference in the other direction is at least . Consequently Fourier detection of a progression-free subset of an interval gives a nonzero frequency with
To turn this into a density increment, take . The Dirichlet approximation theorem, proved here by placing into equal intervals modulo one, gives such that . DefineFor , the inequalities and show thatUse a progression partition with nearly constant linear phase: every residue chain of modulo has at least points. Split each chain into blocks of consecutive chain points, merging any remainder into its last full block. This partitions into arithmetic progressions with and common difference .
On a block with first point , the linear phase satisfiesLet . Freezing the linear phase on each block introduces error at most . ThereforeThe block sums total zero. Their positive part consequently totals at least . Since all block lengths total , some block has . Its density of a finite subset is at least .
For the remaining , divide into disjoint consecutive triples and a remainder of at most two points. A three-term-arithmetic progression-free uses at most two points of each triple, so ; the largest ratio occurs at . Any singleton set from then has density of a finite subset one, which is at least . We may therefore use the explicit constantsIn the large case the constructed arithmetic progression has length at least ; in the small case its length one does too. Thus these constants prove the intended result for all odd integers .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2024 iii Paper 129 2 v Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
Iterate part (iv) as a density increment. At a stage with ambient vector space of dimension and relative density , either the sumset contains a coset of a -dimensional subspace, or there is a subspace of codimension and a coset on which the density is at least . Translate that coset back to the subspace. Since the ambient group has characteristic two, this translation does not alter the translated set's sumset.
The densities grow geometrically, so the iteration has stages, while the total codimension lost isChoose with a sufficiently small absolute . The total codimension is then less than , so every stage still has ambient dimension at least . The density cannot increase indefinitely beyond one; therefore the first alternative must occur. When , take the zero-dimensional subspace; this is the usual integer rounding implicit in the asymptotic dimension bound. Thusfor an absolute .