Discovery of 51 Pegasi b 2026-10-18
Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz began observing 51 Pegasi in September 1994 and revisited its repeating Doppler spectroscopy signal in 1995. Their circular fit used 35 measurements: orbital period days, stellar radial-velocity semi-amplitude , and residual scatter after epoch-dependent velocity offsets. Apparently stable comparison stars checked the instrumental zero point. Low chromospheric stellar activity and an inferred roughly 30-day stellar rotation period argued against starspots; light curves and the spectral line bisector tested stellar pulsation. These checks favoured orbital motion but had finite sensitivity. The reported Jupiter masses was not a true mass. Stronger upper bounds used stellar-spin information and assumed spin–orbit alignment, limiting a nearly face-on binary star interpretation conditionally.[ref]
A Jupiter-mass companion to a solar-type star by Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz. Mayor and Queloz (1995), pp. 356–358, figures 2–4, table 1, and alternative interpretations; scan: wwelsh.sdsu.edu/CLASSES/ASTR510/PAPERS/Mayor-Queloz_51Peg.pdf
The hot Jupiter matters both for planetary migration and for how exoplanets are found. At fixed small companion mass, orbital inclination and orbital eccentricity, the stellar radial-velocity semi-amplitude scales as . Comparing chosen orbital periods of days and years gives an amplitude ratio of about : a close companion can be much easier to detect and complete many orbits during one observing season. Finding a giant planet close to its star also asks how its present orbit relates to where it formed. Doppler spectroscopy supplies a dynamical constraint; it does not by itself establish a formation pathway or measure the exoplanet's radius.
ELODIE spectrograph 2026-10-18
Built by André Baranne, Michel Mayor, Didier Queloz and colleagues, the ELODIE fiber-fed spectrograph carried light from Haute-Provence's 1.93-metre telescope through optical fibers. Its echelle grating dispersed light in high diffraction orders; an optical prism and grism cross-disperser separated them perpendicularly on a charge-coupled device. This cross-dispersed echelle spectrograph achieved spectral resolving power . A simultaneous thorium reference tracked instrumental drift. Wavelength calibration mapped detector positions to wavelengths; spectral cross-correlation combined many spectral lines into a fitted profile. A barycentric velocity correction removed the observer's motion.[ref]
ELODIE measurement chain and synthetic radial-velocity readout
. Original schematic; the correlation profile and periodic signal are synthetic. Details.Why can a spectrograph measure a Doppler shift much smaller than one spectral resolution element? Resolution concerns separating neighbouring features, whereas locating the centre of a known profile uses information across that profile and across many spectral lines. For a chosen example, at a recession velocity of givesAt , one spectral resolution element corresponds to , about times larger. A well measured centre can move by a small fraction of that width. More photons and more useful spectral lines improve the estimate, but do not remove wavelength calibration errors or stellar activity.
A simple mathematical picture of spectral cross-correlation makes the readout concrete. Define , with fixed reference wavelength , and let be continuum-normalized line absorption. For small velocities, a common Doppler shift approximately translates . A positive absorption mask then givesIf , the maximum occurs at ; a convention correlating the received observed radiative flux instead produces a dip. A fitted correlation centre is an effective collective line position, not a claim that each individual spectral line has been resolved into a narrower feature. The lamp tracks instrumental drift, while the barycentric velocity correction removes the observer's changing line-of-sight velocity; neither removes changes in the star itself.
Nobel Prize in Physics in 2019 2026-10-18
One half went to James Peebles for theoretical discoveries in physical cosmology. One quarter each went to Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz for discovering an exoplanet orbiting a solar-type star.[ref]
The Nobel Prize in Physics 2019 by Nobel Prize Outreach. Individual official summary: Peebles one half for physical cosmology; Mayor and Queloz one quarter each for an exoplanet around a solar-type star.
