The exponential settling bound for RC sinusoidal turn-on measures the decaying error relative to the persistent sinusoid's amplitude, rather than dividing by a sinusoid that repeatedly crosses zero. For the RC circuit in sinusoidal steady state, put and let be the sinusoidal particular solution. Subtracting its equation from the full circuit equation givesFor source and an initially uncharged capacitor, the parent article derives and steady amplitude . Thus the normalized transient is exactlyBecause it decreases monotonically, an error threshold is met at all subsequent times onceThis is a transient-to-amplitude specification, not a pointwise relative error at each zero crossing.
For an original comparison, choose , , and . The stated cosine turn-on needs . If the switching wave phase is unknown, the initial steady-state value can instead have magnitude as large as . With zero initial capacitor electric potential difference, the worst-switching-phase settling bound for a first-order circuit is , requiring . The shorter first result depends on the specified switching phase.
An unknown stored initial energy changes the leading mismatch again; the same exponential identity still applies. A bench test must therefore record the switching phase, initial capacitor electric potential difference, and the chosen normalization. MIT's RC laboratory measures the natural decay with square-wave excitation and then compares sinusoidal amplitudes and phases on an oscilloscope.[ref]
Laboratory 11: Sinusoidal Steady State Response of RC and RL Circuits by MIT OpenCourseWare. Printed pp. 1–2, natural response and sinusoidal observations
The worst-switching-phase settling bound for a first-order circuit maximizes the initial transient over the source's unknown switching wave phase. For the stable RC circuit, let its sinusoidal particular solution be , where , and let be the initial capacitor electric potential difference. The error identity in exponential settling bound for RC sinusoidal turn-on givesSince ranges from minus one to one,For a validated initial bound , the sharp uniform bound is therefore . It is attained by choosing the extreme initial value and the opposite steady-state wave phase. A normalized error tolerance is guaranteed thereafter ifThere is no division by the instantaneous sinusoid, so its zero crossings cause no singular relative-error specification.
For an original example, choose , , , and . The worst-case settling time is . Assuming an uncharged capacitor instead would give . That shorter guarantee requires the additional initial-state information.
A phase-locked test can measure a smaller mismatch, even zero for a specially matched initial condition, without contradicting the worst-case result. A valid comparison records both the switching wave phase and the capacitor's initial state. The MIT laboratory's square-wave natural-decay observation and sinusoidal amplitude/wave phase measurement provide the two underlying bench measurements.[ref]
Laboratory 11: Sinusoidal Steady State Response of RC and RL Circuits by MIT OpenCourseWare. Printed pp. 1–2
The result assumes the same linear first-order model throughout switching; additional modes or a time-varying component require another transient bound. Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.