At normal incidence, with no optical dispersion and zero round-trip reflection wave phase modulo , the resonance condition in Fabry–Pérot transmission from multiple reflections is
Here is frequency and is the speed of light in vacuum. A change of by one free spectral range advances the round-trip wave phase by . At fixed internal angle of incidence , the same nondispersive model gives . Holding the external angle of incidence fixed in a dispersive medium need not hold the internal fixed, because of Snell's law.
For stipulated and , the free spectral range is using . A frequency difference of is therefore . Transmission repeats every free spectral range: one isolated scan cannot distinguish that separation from . Independent knowledge of the optical spectrum, an additional filter, or a changed mirror separation is needed to assign orders.
Equal spacing in frequency does not imply equal spacing in wavelength. At normal incidence the exact adjacent resonance wavelengths obey
For example, choosing makes the exact gap to order 11 equal to , while the high-order estimate gives . The approximation is already ten percent larger at order 10. With optical dispersion or frequency-dependent reflection wave phase, obtain local spacings from the total phase difference instead: when its derivative varies little over one order.
Finesse 2026-10-14
The finesse of a Fabry–Pérot interferometer is its free spectral range divided by a transmission peak's full width at half maximum. Large finesse means a narrow accepted frequency interval compared with the spacing between repeated orders. Here half maximum means of the ideal unit peak, with zero detector background subtracted; it does not mean halfway between the transmission minimum and maximum.
Write for the coefficient multiplying in Fabry–Pérot transmission from multiple reflections. This coefficient is sometimes called the coefficient of finesse; it is not the finesse . About a resonance , put . Solving gives
and, since one free spectral range advances the wave phase by ,
These are exact for the ideal nondispersive model with constant and linear frequency dependence of . The inverse sine requires , or . At equality, neighbouring peaks merely touch half maximum at their shared minima: the nominal width is one full free spectral range and . Isolated half-maximum peaks require the strict inequality. Below this threshold the transmission never falls to , so this peak-width definition supplies no finesse; at the transmission is flat.
For large reflectivity, the small-angle approximation gives
This is a high-reflectivity approximation, not an identity for every . The original dimensionless examples below have exact full width at half maximum values obtained from the inverse sine formula.
Mirror intensity reflectivity Exact Exact finesseApproximate finesse
Figure 1.
Increasing mirror reflectivity narrows Fabry–Pérot interferometer transmission peaks
. Original stipulated dimensionless model for , with and modulo . All curves peak at unity and repeat after . The second panel enlarges the central resonance; coloured segments at mark each exact full width at half maximum. The inset compares exact finesse with the high-reflectivity approximation. These are calculations, not measured scans. Details.
The beauty of the narrowing is visible directly in the geometric series: large preserves contributions from many round trips, so a small phase difference accumulates across many terms and spoils their addition. For the stipulated vacuum gap, gives an ideal full width at half maximum of about . This instrumental width is not a measured spectral line width. A real scan also depends on the source profile, accepted angles, mirror shape, alignment, and scan stability. The University of Washington handout separately discusses mirror-reflectivity, mirror-flatness, and detector-pinhole contributions; increasing alone cannot remove the others.[ref]