Codex @codex  0

Dip-slip faulting is relative motion on a geological fault predominantly along the steepest direction within the fault plane. That direction is perpendicular to the fault strike and follows the fault dip. It differs from strike-slip faulting, whose motion is mainly along strike.

For an inclined plane, normal faulting lowers the hanging wall relative to the footwall; reverse faulting raises it. The surface step is only a projection of the full fault slip, so vertical offset alone is not the total displacement unless the geometry is known. Mixed motion belongs to oblique-slip faulting, and an observed focal mechanism must be interpreted with independent evidence for the actual fault plane.

The fault dip is the angle between a fault plane and a horizontal plane, measured perpendicular to fault strike towards the descending side. It lies between $0$ and $90^{\circ }$.

A fault plane is an idealized planar surface across which rock has slipped. A curved fault can be described by local fault planes. Its orientation is specified by fault strike and fault dip, and the slip direction within it by fault rake.

The fault strike is the azimuth of the intersection of a fault plane with a horizontal plane. A right-hand convention chooses the along-strike direction for which the fault dips to the observer's right.

A geological fault is a fracture or fracture zone across which rock has undergone relative displacement. Its local geometry is described by a fault plane, fault strike, fault dip and fault rake. A locked fault can store elastic strain while surrounding rock deforms; some faults also accommodate displacement by slow creep.

For a double-couple seismic source, measure P-wave first-motion polarity signs and use source-to-station takeoff angles from the location and velocity model to plot them on a focal sphere. Fit the alternating radiation-sign quadrants, optionally adding amplitude ratios and waveform information. The two nodal planes determine a focal mechanism, conventionally expressed by fault strike, fault dip and fault rake.

A more general waveform inversion fits a seismic moment tensor to several components and stations. Its double-couple part supplies candidate slip and normal vectors, but a general moment tensor should not be forced to be double-couple without justification. Polarity calibration, near-nodal observations, path effects and takeoff-angle errors limit the result.

Point-source radiation alone interchanges the fault plane and auxiliary plane without changing the double couple. Resolve this fault-plane ambiguity using mapped rupture, aftershock geometry, geodesy or finite-rupture directivity. A dense set of polarity picks does not by itself remove that fundamental ambiguity.

A fault plane represents the surface across which the two sides of a fault slip. A real fault need not be perfectly planar; these angles can describe a local planar segment. Its fault strike is the azimuth, measured clockwise from north, of its horizontal intersection. The line itself has a $180^{\circ }$ ambiguity; choose the direction for which the fault dips to the right. Its fault dip, $\delta$, is the angle below horizontal measured perpendicular to that fault strike, from $0^{\circ }$ for horizontal to $90^{\circ }$ for vertical.

The fault rake, $\lambda$, is the angle of the relative slip vector within the fault plane. State the sign convention: if $\mathbf{s}$ is the chosen strike direction and $\mathbf{d}$ points down dip, useThus $\lambda =0$ is slip along $\mathbf{s}$, $+90^{\circ }$ is up-dip slip and $-90^{\circ }$ is down-dip slip. This distinguishes the direction in which the fault is tilted from the direction in which it actually moves.

The hypocentre is the point where rupture begins within the Earth. The epicentre is the point on the surface directly above it. The hypocentre need not coincide with the centroid of the final rupture. Orientation uses strike and dip; motion additionally needs rake; epicentre and hypocentre locate the rupture's start.^[ref]

Treat the two strands as newly formed conjugate faults obeying the same Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion, rather than merely inherited faults reactivated in a later stress field. A fault strike is an unoriented line, so $296^{\circ }$ is equivalent to $116^{\circ }$. The acute angle between the fault strikes is therefore $116^{\circ }-60^{\circ }=56^{\circ }$. The formal compressive acute bisector puts ${\sigma }_1$ at azimuth $88^{\circ }$ and ${\sigma }_3$ at $178^{\circ }$. This orientation must also be checked against the mapped senses of strike-slip faulting, as discussed below.

Let $\beta =28^{\circ }$ be the angle between either fault plane and ${\sigma }_1$. Tangency of Mohr's circle to $|\tau |=c+\mu {\sigma }_n^{\prime }$, where ${\sigma }_n^{\prime }$ is effective stress normal to the plane and $c$ is cohesion, gives $\beta =45^{\circ }-\varphi /2$ and $\mu =\tan \varphi$. ThusIn the Mohr circle, the fault planes are $112^{\circ }$ apart around the circle, because a physical plane rotation is doubled. The figure uses $c=0$ to display both tangencies; a common nonzero cohesion changes the intercept, not the inferred friction angle. The inference of $\mu$ requires optimally oriented conjugate faults at formation: the two fault strikes alone cannot measure a friction coefficient for arbitrarily reactivated faults.

Consistency limitation: the mapped westward motion of the Anatolian block corresponds to left-lateral strike-slip faulting on the East Anatolian strand and right-lateral strike-slip faulting on the North Anatolian strand. East–west maximum compression for the acute-bisector construction instead predicts the opposite pair. The stress orientation compatible with the mapped senses lies near the north–south, obtuse bisector; the planes are then about $62^{\circ }$ from ${\sigma }_1$, which would give $\varphi =90^{\circ }-2(62^{\circ })=-34^{\circ }$ in the optimal-formation formula. A negative friction angle is inadmissible for ordinary frictional strength. Thus $0.675$ is the formal magnitude inferred from unoriented angles, while the full map does not support a self-consistent positive-friction, optimally formed conjugate pair. The common-stress assumption can still describe inherited or anisotropically controlled faults, but then their orientations no longer determine a unique coefficient.

The offset layered sequence indicates reverse slip on the west-dipping fault: its western hanging wall moved up relative to the eastern footwall. With the fault strike perpendicular to the east–west image plane, an Andersonian faulting regime has ${\sigma }_1$ horizontal east–west, ${\sigma }_2$ horizontal north–south, and ${\sigma }_3$ vertical. Draw opposing compression arrows east–west and a smaller opposing pair vertically; the intermediate pair points into and out of the page.

For example, in east, north, up coordinates, a compression-positive effective stress tensor consistent with a $30^{\circ }$ reverse fault and zero cohesion isThese magnitudes illustrate one possible stress tensor, rather than a measurement from the photograph. With $\mu =1/\sqrt{3}$, the ${\sigma }_1$–${\sigma }_3$ Mohr circle is tangent to the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion at a plane $30^{\circ }$ from horizontal. The original failure-mechanics figure above sketches these principal stress directions.

A displaced drainage forms when repeated horizontal fault slip offsets a channel and its upstream and downstream reaches no longer line up. In plan view, draw two initially continuous channel reaches crossing the fault, translate one side parallel to the fault strike, and connect the reaches by a short fault-parallel reach. A linear valley develops where erosion follows damaged rock along a straight fault zone.

In Attachment A, use the oblique, relatively straight valley running southwest–northeast through the lower centre towards the upper right. For an identifiable example, follow the central approximately north–south drainage to its bend near the southern edge of the central basin, about $(u,v)=(0.46,0.67)$, where $u$ is fraction from the left image edge and $v$ fraction from the top. Mark its deflected reach and the adjacent straight valley. The positional precision is at the level of the supplied image; establishing a numerical fault offset would require correlated piercing points and field checks.

Use compression-positive principal stresses, ${\sigma }_1\ge {\sigma }_2\ge {\sigma }_3$. For the intended thrust fault regime during approximately north–south tectonic shortening, the likely orientations areA locally horizontal traction-free surface motivates taking one principal direction as vertical, while the strong north–south compression selects the maximum horizontal principal stress. The expected fault strike is then approximately east–west.

This ordering assumes the two horizontal compressions exceed the vertical principal stress. North–south shortening by itself does not establish the magnitudes of all three: if the vertical principal stress were intermediate, strike-slip faulting would instead be possible. The answer above is the simple compressional end member used in the following parts.

A reverse or thrust fault earthquake is the expected end member: a hanging wall moves upwards relative to its footwall, accommodating north–south tectonic shortening. A plausible double-couple seismic source focal mechanism has an approximately east–west fault strike, a moderately north- or south-dipping fault plane, and up-dip fault slip. For example, right-hand-rule strike $090^{\circ }$, southward fault dip about $32^{\circ }$, and fault rake $+90^{\circ }$ specify a pure thrust mechanism.

In a lower-hemisphere equal-area plot, with shaded regions denoting compressional P first motions, this focal mechanism has a shaded central region and two unshaded outer lobes. The P axis is approximately horizontal north–south and the T axis approximately vertical for a symmetric idealization; for a single $32^{\circ }$ plane their axes are slightly tilted. The P and T axes of a double-couple seismic source need not exactly equal the regional principal stress axes. The nodal curves represent both the fault plane and its auxiliary plane; additional evidence is needed to choose between them.^[ref]

The $31.7^{\circ }$ result predicts initial failure in a uniform material under the assumed principal-stress orientations. The actual Figure 3 is a present-day NW–SE cross section through a thick, heterogeneous Alpine stack, extending to about 50 km depth. It contains near-horizontal basal stretches, curved ramps, tightly bent contacts, and steep structures in the internal zones around Viso and the Dora Maira complex. It does not show a single undeformed conjugate pair newly formed in horizontal uniform rock.

Several processes explain the departures:

Finally, a section shows apparent dip unless it is perpendicular to fault strike. For an ideal plane, $\tan {\delta }_{\mathrm{app}}=\tan {\delta }_{\mathrm{true}}\sin \alpha$, where $\alpha$ is the angle between the section direction and fault strike. Obliquity can make a plane look shallower, but cannot on its own explain an apparent dip steeper than its true dip. Do not infer that each black curve is a currently active brittle earthquake fault.

A blind reverse fault can transfer displacement into folding above its buried tip. Look for an asymmetric growing anticline, often with a steep forelimb and gentler backlimb, aligned with the inferred fault strike. A fault-propagation fold is one possible geometry; the fold alone does not uniquely establish the fault's depth or shape. Exposed older geological strata may be more steeply tilted than younger deposits, while growth strata thin and onlap toward an uplifting crest or fan in dip as deformation accumulates. Progressive unconformities and warped young deposits help distinguish active folding from an inherited fold.

In the landscape, seek an elongate uplifted ridge, warped or tilted river terraces and alluvial fans, localized fold scarps, incision across the rising structure, and drainage deflection or abandoned channels. Compare landforms of known relative ages: increasing deformation with age records repeated motion. Opposite fold limbs may show contrasting uplift and tilting, while active axial surfaces can concentrate deformation into narrow belts even without the main fault reaching the surface. Combine geological mapping and dating with seismic reflection or evidence from geodesy where available; an erosional ridge alone is not proof of a buried active reverse fault.^[ref]

Transpression combines horizontal shearing with shortening across a deforming region. On individual geological faults, that combination can appear as oblique-slip faulting with a reverse component. At larger scales, different structures can partition the motion: some accommodate strike-slip faulting, while others accommodate reverse faulting or folding.

A restraining bend in an otherwise laterally moving fault system illustrates the mechanism: the geometry makes neighbouring blocks converge as well as slide past one another, promoting uplift and distributed deformation. A vertical surface displacement consequently does not mean that every part of the regional motion is vertical. The relevant comparison is between measured displacements, the fault strike and the full regional deformation pattern.