Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2001 iii Paper 59 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Vary the Maxwell Lagrangian with respect to . Since and is antisymmetric,After integration by parts, the Euler-Lagrange field equation isThe gauge transformation leaves unchanged because partial derivatives commute. This gauge invariance means that potentials related in this way represent the same electromagnetic field; all four potential components are not independent physical photon degrees of freedom. In particular, the ungauged kinetic operator is singular and its temporal canonical momentum vanishes.
Choose the Lorenz gauge . The field equation then becomes . Residual gauge transformations with preserve this condition. The correctly named Lorenz gauge condition concerns the divergence of the potential; Lorentz covariance is the separate transformation property of the equations.
For the alternative quadratic Lagrangian density, direct differentiation givesso its Euler-Lagrange field equation is also . This density is the Feynman-gauge Maxwell kinetic density after a boundary-term subtraction. Indeed, with ,The divergence identity follows by expanding and commuting its second derivatives. The quadratic density alone describes four wave equations; the gauge constraint must still be incorporated in the physical states. It is not an unconstrained four-positive-polarization replacement for Maxwell equations.
Using this specified boundary-term convention, the canonical momentum conjugate to isThe canonical commutation relations are thereforewith field-field and momentum-momentum brackets zero. Equivalently . The temporal component has the opposite sign to the spatial components; replacing the metric by a positive Euclidean one would destroy these brackets.
The wave equation gives massless frequencies . Hermiticity pairs its positive- and negative-frequency solutions, so the Heisenberg picture field has the expansionThis is a real field expansion for each component, but its oscillator metric is indefinite. The assumed brackets, with the dagger's vector index restored, areThey verify the photon oscillator completeness and canonical brackets. Inserting gives at equal timesThe other brackets cancel between the two frequency contributions. Thus both the normalization and the sign are needed.
The Gupta-Bleuler formalism imposes the Lorenz gauge condition weakly on states:Here is the annihilation, positive-frequency part. Setting the full divergence to zero as an operator would conflict with the four-component canonical commutation relations. The subsidiary condition instead selects a physical pre-space inside the covariant photon Fock space, followed by a quotient of its null states.
Apply it to . Commuting through the creator gives a multiple of . Hence the allowed photon polarization vectors obeyTake . The complete solution iswith complex coefficients. The last two vectors are transverse linear photon polarizations, and gives the two circular photon polarizations. The first vector is , the allowed temporal-longitudinal combination. A purely spatial longitudinal vector by itself does not satisfy the subsidiary condition.
The oscillator brackets give, apart from the positive continuum normalization factor,Momentum eigenstates are distributionally normalized; a box or a wave packet makes the norm statement literal. The allowed longitudinal combination has zero norm because , and it is orthogonal to every constrained state since . It also gives a pure-gauge field wave: the field strength of vanishes. Thus and represent the same physical photon polarization. The Gupta-Bleuler null-state quotient removes this null direction and leaves two positive-norm transverse photon photon polarizations. The negative-norm temporal oscillator of the unrestricted space is not an extra physical state. This is the transverse one-photon physical quotient.
Finally verify the two-photon fermion Ward identity directly for electron-positron annihilation into two photons. Define and the reduced Dirac propagatorThe equality follows from the Clifford algebra, since . The incoming Dirac spinors obey and . On replacing one inserted photon polarization vector by , the spinor factor in the two diagrams isAt the electron end, , soFor the other diagram, four-momentum conservation gives . HenceThe two contributions therefore cancel exactly:Individual diagrams need not vanish; their sum implements the Ward identity. Linearity then gives invariance under , as required by gauge invariance. In particular, the null longitudinal photon polarization proportional to has zero physical production amplitude. Physical scattering produces the transverse photon classes, not an independent longitudinal massless photon.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2003 iii Paper 44 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use throughout. Vary the Maxwell action with respect to the electromagnetic four-potential. Antisymmetry of the electromagnetic field tensor gives . After integration by parts, the Euler-Lagrange field equation isA gauge transformation leaves unchanged because partial derivatives commute. It therefore leaves the Maxwell action and observable electromagnetic fields unchanged: different potentials represent the same physical field. This redundancy matters for canonical quantization: before gauge fixing, the momentum conjugate to vanishes and the four potential components cannot be treated as four independent physical oscillators.
Choose the Lorenz gauge , attainable by solving with suitable boundary data. The Euler-Lagrange field equation then reduces toResidual Lorenz gauge symmetry consists of transformations with . The gauge condition and this residual redundancy ultimately leave two transverse polarizations of a free photon.
For the specified kinetic density , one has . Its Euler-Lagrange field equation is therefore . This density is the Feynman-gauge Maxwell kinetic density after a boundary-term subtraction, sinceThe divergence follows by expanding both sides and commuting the second derivatives. Thus the wave equation follows from a Feynman gauge action; the additional physical-state condition will implement the Lorenz gauge. One must not impose inside the original action before varying it.
Take the covariant components as canonical coordinates. The canonical momentum computed from isThe equal-time canonical Poisson brackets are , with coordinate-coordinate and momentum-momentum brackets zero. Applying canonical quantization givesIn particular . The negative temporal sign is the source of the indefinite state-space norm in covariant photon quantization.
The spatial Fourier transform of the wave equation gives an oscillator of frequency for each component. The Hermitian adjoint condition on the electromagnetic four-potential then yields the mode expansion of a free fieldThese are massless on shell modes. Consistently with the preceding equal-time canonical commutation relation,The normalization is the same as for the scalar modes, with replacing the species identity matrix.
Gupta-Bleuler quantization starts with the Fock vacuum annihilated by every and imposes only the annihilation, or positive-frequency part of a quantum field, of the Lorenz gauge condition:Imposing the entire Hermitian field divergence as a strong operator identity would be incompatible with the four-component canonical commutation relation. The weaker condition suffices: between two physical states its positive-frequency part vanishes on the ket, and its negative-frequency part vanishes on the bra. Hence .
For a one-photon state , commuting the constraint through the creator givesThus the allowed photon polarization vectors satisfy . Their state inner product, with the common momentum-normalization factor suppressed, is . Momentum eigenstates are delta-normalized; the same statements hold with finite norms for normalizable wave packets.
Rotate the spatial axes so that . The constraint is , so the complete allowed family isThe first vector is the allowed longitudinal gauge polarization, proportional to the null four-momentum . Its state has zero norm because ; it is also orthogonal to every constrained state because . A purely spatial vector alone is not an allowed physical polarization: its time component must accompany it to satisfy the constraint. The other two vectors are transverse polarizations, perpendicular to , with positive unit norms. For the displayed family,The timelike negative-norm excitation has been excluded by the constraint, and the remaining form is positive semidefinite. The Gupta-Bleuler null-state quotient identifies and , removing the null direction. It leaves exactly two transverse physical photon polarizations with a positive inner product; their bosonic Fock space is the physical photon state space.
Finally use Feynman slash notation, , and impose four-momentum conservation . The external Dirac spinors obeySet and . Replacing by in the first term of the electron-positron annihilation into two photons amplitude, the rightmost contracted vertex obeysSince the Clifford algebra implies , that term becomesFor the second term, four-momentum conservation gives . The contracted vertex is now adjacent to the outgoing positron spinor on the left, soConsequentlyThe two terms cancel, proving the two-photon fermion Ward identityExchanging the two photon labels proves the same result for . By linearity the amplitude is invariant under on either external photon leg. Therefore the null longitudinal gauge polarization has zero production amplitude: physical scattering produces only the two transverse photon polarizations. This cancellation also shows why both photon orderings in the tree-level Feynman diagrams are essential; either term alone fails the Ward identity.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 iii Paper 48 3 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Put . The gauge-fixing variation isAfter integration by parts its contribution to the Euler-Lagrange field equations is . It cancels the from the Maxwell Lagrangian, giving for all four components. This is the Feynman gauge equation; the physical Lorenz gauge condition must still be imposed on states rather than inferred as an additional classical equation from this gauge-fixed density.
Treating the covariant components as coordinates, the derivative of the actual displayed density with respect to gives the canonical momentaIn terms of lower-index spatial coordinates,The gauge fixing has supplied the nonzero momentum of , absent from the ungauge-fixed Maxwell Lagrangian.
There is a boundary-term convention needed for the next part's printed momentum expansion. Direct expansion gives the Feynman-gauge Maxwell kinetic density after a boundary-term subtraction:To verify it, the difference of the densities is ; differentiating gives these two terms, while the remaining second-derivative terms cancel after renaming indices. The subtracted density has , which is exactly the momentum used by the mode expansion in part (c). The literal momenta asked for here are the boxed expression, not . Both densities have the same field equations, and their canonical commutation relations agree through the boundary-induced canonical transformation in Feynman gauge.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 301 1 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Write . The additional gauge fixing variation is . Integration by parts gives the Euler-Lagrange field equation , hence . This equation follows from the gauge-fixed density without imposing as a separate operator identity.
Direct differentiation of the density as printed gives the canonical momentum components conjugate to the lower-index fields:There is a boundary-term convention to reconcile with part (c). The Feynman-gauge Maxwell kinetic density after a boundary-term subtraction isIt has the same Euler-Lagrange field equations, but its canonical momentum components are . The mode expansion supplied in part (c) is the expansion of these latter momenta. Thus it is valid after the stated boundary-term subtraction; it is not the direct derivative of the original density. For example, a time-independent spatially varying with gives but .
The boundary-term shift of canonical field momenta is a canonical transformation. If spatial boundary terms vanish, , and . This explains why the two conventions have the same dynamics while their momentum formulas differ.