Fix a number field , a positive integer , and a finite set of its finite places. There are finitely many field extensions of degree at most unramified outside , inside a fixed algebraic closure. To see this, view them as extensions of the rational numbers of bounded degree. Their ramified rational primes belong to a fixed finite set. At each of these primes, the different exponent is bounded in terms of the local degree and ramification index, giving a bound for the absolute field discriminant. The Hermite–Minkowski theorem gives finitely many fields up to isomorphism, and each has only finitely many embeddings into the fixed closure. This useful form of arithmetic compactness is stated and proved for in Andrew Sutherland's number-theory notes, Theorem 14.25; the preceding reduction gives the general case.
Ci field 2026-10-07
A field is if every homogeneous polynomial of degree in more than variables has a nonzero zero. Algebraically closed fields are , finite fields are , and the Lang-Nagata theorem for Ci fields controls function-field extensions.
Complexification fibres of a real scheme 2026-10-07
For a scheme over , its base change of a morphism of schemes to has scheme-theoretic fibre over a point equal to . This is the spectrum of . It has two points if is a square in the residue field, and otherwise one point with a quadratic field extension. In both cases it is reduced, because the quadratic polynomial has no repeated root in characteristic zero. The distinction applies to generic points as well as closed points.
For a finitely generated field extension in characteristic zero, a tuple is algebraically independent exactly when its differentials are linearly independent in the Kähler differentials. A relation of minimum total degree gives a nontrivial differential relation; an independent tuple extends to a transcendence basis. In positive characteristic, derivatives of nonconstant relations can vanish identically.
Suppose a Non-Archimedean absolute value on has a unique extension to every finite field extension. Any K-isomorphism between conjugate roots pulls the absolute value back to an extension on the source field, which must be the given one. Thus for every . This argument includes inseparable irreducible polynomials: no transitive Galois action or completeness assumption is needed.
Extension of an absolute value Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
For a field extension , an extension of an absolute value on is an absolute value on whose restriction to is .
Finite generation descends along a field extension Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-28
Let be a field extension. If is a finitely generated algebra over , then is finitely generated over . Choose finitely many generators of and collect the finitely many coefficients from occurring in them. The -subalgebra generated by those coefficients satisfies , and faithful flatness of gives .
Finite-type integer algebra 2026-10-07
A unital commutative ring generated by finitely many elements under addition and multiplication, starting from the image of the integers. Equivalently it is a quotient of a finite-variable polynomial ring over . localization of a ring at one element remains finite type, since . Generation here is as an algebra, not merely as a field extension when the ring happens to be a field.
Lang-Nagata theorem for Ci fields 2026-10-07
Northcott theorem Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
There are only finitely many algebraic numbers of bounded degree and bounded Absolute multiplicative Weil height. The finite set can be enumerated effectively from the bounded coefficients of their primitive minimal polynomials.
Number field Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-28
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 21 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
For a complete discretely valued field with perfect residue field , the Witt residue sequence is the split exact sequenceThe first map identifies the unramified Brauer classes. The residue map is canonical; a splitting is chosen by a uniformizer and sends an unramified character to the cyclic Brauer class . Changing may change this splitting by an unramified class. This is the version of Witt's theorem used here.
Now suppose . Fix arithmetic Frobenius . Define the local Brauer invariant byHere is an explicit cohomological construction. Set and . The permitted vanishing , together with Hilbert 90 and inflation, identifies with . Normalize the valuation . Its induced map sends a multiplicative two-cocycle to the integer-valued two-cocycle , givingThe middle isomorphism is the connecting map for , since positive-degree continuous cohomology of the trivial module vanishes.
To see that the valuation map is an isomorphism, its module sequence splits using , and the unit part has zero second cohomology. For each finite unramified cyclic extension , cyclic cohomology identifies that unit contribution with . The norm on residue-field units is surjective. On the principal-unit quotient of level , the norm is the residue trace, through . The trace of a finite separable field extension is surjective; successive corrections and completeness therefore make the norm surjective on all units. Passing to the direct limit gives the asserted vanishing. Finally, a continuous character of is uniquely specified by its value on arithmetic Frobenius, and that value can be any element of . The invariant map is an isomorphism.
In concrete terms, if is the unramified extension of degree and lifts arithmetic Frobenius, the cyclic algebra with and hasIndeed its standard two-cocycle has value when the powers of wrap past and value one otherwise. Valuation turns this into the connecting cocycle for the character with Frobenius value . This also fixes the sign of the normalization.
For restriction and corestriction of local Brauer invariants, let be the residue field of , the ramification index and . A finite extension of local fields has , and . Every class of is , with unramified. After restriction to , its character has Frobenius value and its parameter has valuation . ThusFor corestriction, write a class of as . Choose a character of the finite-field absolute group such that . This is possible because restriction is multiplication by on , which is divisible. Inflate both characters to the local fields. The norm projection formula for cyclic Brauer pairings givesThis projection identity follows from the cohomological transfer and cup-product identity; on multiplicative degree-zero coefficients transfer is the field norm, and the identity in higher degree follows by the cochain definition or dimension shifting. The norm parameter has -valuation , so its invariant is . ThereforeThis argument uses the character-and-norm description directly and does not cancel multiplication by in , where such cancellation would be invalid. For purely inseparable steps in equal characteristic, absolute Galois groups identify, restriction uses inclusion of multiplicative coefficient modules, and Brauer corestriction uses the field norm on them. The same projection calculation applies. Factoring a general finite extension into separable and purely inseparable steps covers all finite extensions in the question.
Lastly, a class with invariant in lowest terms has Brauer period . The unramified extension of degree splits it, so its division-algebra degree divides . Conversely a maximal subfield of the division algebra splits it and has degree equal to that division-algebra degree; the restriction formula forces to divide that degree. These standard splitting-field properties are among the permitted inputs. Thus the index of a central simple algebra equals its period over a local field. The central division algebras of degree are exactly those with invariants and . The Brauer class determines its division representative uniquely, so there areisomorphism classes, where is the Euler totient function. This includes the single degree-one algebra .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 4 5 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
The characteristic of is either a prime or zero. In characteristic , it is a finitely generated algebra over . The course's Zariski lemma says that a field finitely generated as an algebra over a field is a finite algebraic extension of that field. ThereforeIt remains to exclude characteristic zero. Write . Because is then a field containing , also . Zariski lemma makes finite algebraic. Each has a monic equation with rational coefficients. Choose a positive integer clearing all their coefficient denominators. Each is then integral over , so is integral over . This algebra equals : it contains the given integer algebra , and already lies in the field .
An integral field extension forces the base domain to be a field. To see it here, for a nonzero its inverse in satisfiesMultiplying by givesThus would be a field. But choose a prime . Reduction modulo is a well-defined map , so the nonzero element is not invertible in . This contradiction rules out characteristic zero. Therefore the finite-field theorem for finitely generated integer algebras yieldsThis uses Zariski lemma and elementary integrality, not a claim that a field merely finitely generated as a field extension must be algebraic.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2013 iii Paper 13 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
A ring homomorphism is understood to preserve . Start with . Its map on spectra of rings isContraction gives a prime ideal, and . Thus is continuous for the Zariski topology. On each principal open subscheme, the structure sheaf map is the ring homomorphismThese maps commute with restrictions, so they define a sheaf morphism . At , with , its stalk map is . The inverse image of the maximal ideal is , so this is a local homomorphism. We have constructed a morphism of locally ringed spaces.
Conversely, let be a morphism of locally ringed spaces. Its map on global sections gives , using and . Fix and put . Compatibility with the stalk maps and the local homomorphism property giveConsequently , so the underlying map is forced. On , the sheaf morphism is forced as well: it extends and sends to a unit, hence agrees with the displayed map by the universal property of localization. The principal open subschemes form a basis, so the entire sheaf morphism is determined. Taking global sections of the construction recovers . The two constructions are inverse, proving the affine-target adjunction for schemes in the affine-source case:
To describe the real affine plane scheme points, write . It is a unique factorization domain of Krull dimension two. Its points are exactly the following prime ideals:
- , the generic point of the whole affine plane.
- for each nonconstant irreducible polynomial , taken up to multiplication by a nonzero real constant. These are the height-one points, each the generic point of the integral scheme .
- The maximal ideals, or closed points. By the Zariski lemma, their residue fields are finite algebraic extensions of . Because is a real closed field, those fields are or . The first type is with . The second type is the kernel of evaluation at a nonreal pair ; the pairs and give the same maximal ideal, and these are the only repetitions.
For completeness, any height-one prime ideal contains an irreducible polynomial ; since is already a height-one prime ideal, it must equal . Every remaining nonzero prime ideal has height two and is maximal, by Krull dimension. For a nonreal pair, evaluation generates all of over , so its kernel is maximal. Conversely, each residue field isomorphic to has exactly the two conjugate real-algebra embeddings into , proving the assertion about repetitions.
This describes the topology too: consists of the prime ideals containing , and the closure of a point is . In particular, the closure of is the whole affine plane, while the closure of contains precisely the closed points on , together with itself. The spectrum is much larger than the set . For example, is a height-one point although its curve has no real points. Its structure sheaf has and stalk at .
The induced morphism of schemesis contraction of prime ideals, with the structure sheaf maps given above. On closed points, it sends to the kernel of real-polynomial evaluation at . A real closed point has one complex point above it; a nonreal closed point has two, interchanged by complex conjugation. The source generic point maps to the target generic point. The source height-one points are generated by irreducible complex polynomials . Their contractions are height-one prime ideals , and is a factor of over . An irreducible real either stays irreducible over or splits into two distinct conjugate irreducible factors. Indeed, complex conjugation acts transitively on its distinct factors, or a proper orbit product would give a real factor of ; every orbit has size at most two. Repeated factors are excluded by separability in characteristic zero. Thus one or two height-one points lie above .
The complexification fibres of a real scheme give a uniform description of all scheme-theoretic fibres, including the nonclosed points, is especially useful. The extension of coordinate rings isa free -module with basis . At , with residue field , the scheme-theoretic fibre isIf is a square in , the Chinese remainder theorem gives , hence two points. Otherwise it is a quadratic field extension, hence one point. The polynomial has no repeated root in characteristic zero, so all these scheme-theoretic fibres are reduced schemes. This also proves surjectivity. Conjugation acts on each two-point fibre by exchanging its points and fixes each one-point fibre. As a finite morphism, is closed, so its underlying topological space is the quotient by complex conjugation. The fibre formula explains why a real closed point gives one complex point, whereas the generic point gives a single point with residue field .