Locally free module 2026-10-14
A locally free module is one whose associated sheaf is locally a free module. In the finite constant-rank case, it becomes free of rank on a principal open subset cover of . Equivalently it is a finite projective module of constant rank . A surjection onto it splits, so the kernel is also finite projective. Its associated sheaf is a locally free sheaf and defines an algebraic vector bundle.
// Target: algebraic-geometry.bigb
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 17 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let . Work with commutative rings and take a quotient to mean a surjection , considered up to an isomorphism of commuting with . Equivalently, retain its kernel as a submodule of . Here a rank- locally free module is finite locally free, or equivalently a finite projective module of constant rank . A ring homomorphism sends the quotient toThe tensor product of modules is right exact and preserves finite projectivity, so this defines the functorial action. We prove scheme representability in the usual functor of points sense:naturally in . The Grassmannian of locally free quotients will be constructed explicitly.
Assume first , and choose a basis of . For every ordered subset , consider those quotients for which are a basis of . This choice gives a unique identification , in which the quotient is represented by an matrix whose columns indexed by are the identity matrix. Its remaining entries are arbitrary elements of . Thus this subfunctor is represented by the affine schemeThere is no further change-of-basis ambiguity: the selected quotient images already specify its basis uniquely.
For another subset , write for the square submatrix consisting of the columns. The same quotient lies in the chart exactly when its determinant is a unit. Consequently the chart overlap is the principal open subsetOn that overlap the matrix normalized in the basis isThe entries are regular on by the adjugate matrix. Conversely, the columns of form , so normalization back to recovers . The transition is therefore an isomorphism .
The cocycle identity follows from the same matrix computation, not just an assertion about bases. On a triple overlap, normalization first to and then to givesThis is direct normalization from to . By gluing of schemes along open subschemes, the standard affine charts of the quotient Grassmannian therefore glue to a scheme over .
The universal matrices also glue a universal quotient. On , use the surjectionOn overlaps, identify its targets by , precisely the transition matrix above. The cocycle identity glues these free sheaves into a rank- locally free sheaf and glues the maps into . Its kernel is locally free of rank : on an explicit basis isHence we have the universal exact sequence
It remains to verify that these charts capture every quotient, including a nonfree projective target. Given , define as the locus where the selected images , , form a basis. This is open: locally trivialize the locally free sheaf associated with , and it is the nonvanishing locus of the corresponding maximal minor. The sets cover . Indeed, at every prime , the images of all vectors span the -dimensional residue-field quotient, so some of them form a basis there. Their determinant is a unit in , hence they form a basis over that local ring and on an open neighbourhood of .
On , trivialize using exactly those selected images. The remaining columns give regular functions and hence a morphism . On , the normalized matrices satisfy the displayed transition formula, so the local morphisms glue to a morphismIts pullback of the universal quotient is the original quotient, because this is true in each of the specified bases. Conversely, any morphism pulls back the universal sequence to a rank- locally free quotient. On each inverse-image chart its matrix is exactly the normalized matrix used to reconstruct , so the two constructions are inverse. They are unchanged by an isomorphism commuting with the quotient map, and they commute with every base change . This proves the natural bijection and thereforeTaking kernels over a field identifies this with the usual Grassmannian of -dimensional subspaces of . The construction itself does not assume the target module is globally free.
For , the only quotient is zero; for , a surjection to a locally free module of the same rank is an isomorphism, as can be checked locally by its determinant. Both endpoint functors are represented by . If , no such quotient exists over a nonempty test scheme, and the representing scheme is empty. Finally, scheme representability does not mean representation by a single ring: already gives , which is not affine. This is the standard algebraic-geometric meaning of representability for the functor on rings here.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 iii Paper 6 6 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Since is a finitely generated module, choose a surjection from a finite free module, . A finite free module over a left Noetherian ring is a Noetherian module, so the kernel is finitely generated. Choose a finite free module surjecting onto , then compose its map with . Its kernel is again finitely generated. Repeating constructs an exact sequencewith all finite free modules, hence finitely generated projective modules. Thus the requested projective resolution exists, without asserting that it has finite length.
Assume now that and . We may arrange a length- projective resolution with all terms finite projective. Here is why the preceding construction gives one. Set , with short exact sequences . Applying the Ext functor, whose positive degrees vanish on a projective first argument, gives by repeated dimension shiftingfor every left module . The final equality follows from the existence of any length- projective resolution. Vanishing of these degree-one groups means that every short exact sequence ending in splits: its extension class is zero. In particular a free surjection onto splits, so is a projective module. It is finitely generated by the Noetherian kernel construction. Use and for to obtainFor a left finite projective module , put , a right module under . It is a right finite projective module, and its natural evaluation mapis an isomorphism. These claims hold for a finite free module by coordinates, and pass to direct summands, proving them for every finite projective module without any right-Noetherian hypothesis.
Suppose and . Computing the Ext functor from this resolution shows that its last dual mapis surjective. Since is projective as a right module, this map has a right-module section , with . Dualizing gives . Under the natural double-dual identifications, is , so this gives a left-module retraction of .
Therefore for a finite projective module . The next differential has kernel , so restricting it to gives an exact resolution with replacing and the initial removed. This has length , contradicting the definition of projective dimension. For , the nonzero is a finite projective module and a summand of some . A nonzero vector in that summand has a nonzero coordinate, so one coordinate projection restricts to a nonzero map . Thus the degree-zero Hom functor is nonzero as well. We have provedThis is top Ext detects finite projective dimension over a left Noetherian ring. The nonzero-module convention matters when : if one assigns projective dimension zero to the zero module, then is an exception. With the convention , it is outside the asserted finite nonnegative case.
For an example of infinite projective dimension, take the dual numbers over a field , and . The periodic resolution over dual numbers isIt is exact because both the kernel and image of multiplication by are the ideal , and that is also the kernel of . Applying gives a copy of in every degree and zero differentials, since acts as zero on . ConsequentlyA finite projective resolution would make these groups zero above its length, so
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 3 6 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Choose a surjection . Since is a Noetherian ring, a finite free module is a Noetherian module, and its kernel is a finitely generated module. Choose a finite free surjection and repeat. This constructs a resolution by finitely generated free moduleswhose terms are, in particular, finitely generated projective modules. It may be infinite; the request is finite generation of every term, not finite length.
Now suppose the nonzero finitely generated module has finite projective dimension . For , its th syzygy in this free resolution is projective. Indeed, dimension shifting along the successive kernel sequences givesfor every module . The vanishing follows by computing the latter Ext functor from any length- projective resolution. Vanishing of makes every short exact sequence ending in split: apply the long exact sequence of Ext groups to a free surjection onto to lift its identity. Thus is a projective module. It is finitely generated by the preceding construction. Truncating giveswith every term finite projective.
Apply the Hom functor and write . At the top degree,If this group were zero, would be surjective. The dual module of a finite projective module is finite projective, so this surjection has a section . Finite projective modules identify with their double dual modules: the evaluation map is an isomorphism for a finite free module and passes to its direct summands. Dualizing therefore gives . Hence splits, and is projective. Replacing the last two terms by this quotient shortens the projective resolution to length , contradicting minimality. This proves top Ext detects finite projective dimension:For , is a nonzero finite projective module and embeds as a summand of . Some coordinate projection restricts nontrivially to , proving as required.
For infinite projective dimension, take the dual-number algebra and . Multiplication by has image and kernel both equal to , giving the periodic resolution over dual numbersApplying makes every differential zero, so for every . A finite projective resolution would force all sufficiently high Ext functors to vanish. Thus .
The finite-generation hypothesis is essential if the middle sentence's “a module” is interpreted as an unrestricted new module. A concrete vanishing top Ext without finite generation occurs for and . This Noetherian ring has the exact free presentationInjectivity of follows by examining the largest index of a finitely supported input, since is a non-zero-divisor. For exactness in the middle, use the relations to move a finite sum to its largest index ; its remaining coefficient is , which is zero precisely when its image in is zero. The map onto is surjective because every Laurent series has a lower bound on its exponents.
Applying gives on products the map . It is surjective: for any , set . These are well-defined formal power series, because each coefficient receives only finitely many contributions, and . Consequently . But : the image of every must lie in , since it is divisible by every power of . A nonzero projective module is a summand of a free module and therefore has a nonzero coordinate map to . Thus is not projective, while its displayed resolution has length one. In particular,The nonvanishing conclusion proved above retains the finitely generated introduced at the start of the question.
For a nonzero left finitely generated module over a left Noetherian ring, take a finite projective resolution with finite projective modules. Vanishing of its top Ext functor would make the dual of its final injection surjective. These duals are right finite projective modules, so the surjection splits. Dualizing back and using finite projective double dual modules splits the original injection and shortens the resolution, contradicting the definition of projective dimension. When the dimension is zero, a coordinate map of a finite free module containing the nonzero projective summand supplies a nonzero map to . The left/right distinction in the duals is essential for a noncommutative ring.