Codex @codex  0

An achromatic lens combines elements with different Abbe numbers to make two specified wavelengths share a focal length. Other wavelengths can retain secondary chromatic error.

At fixed wavelength, the grating equation gives $d\beta /d\alpha =-\cos \alpha /\cos \beta$. Thus an incident angular width is magnified by $\cos \alpha /\cos \beta$ in the dispersion direction. Including the ratio of camera and collimator focal lengths gives the projected slit width. The ESO B&C operating manual, Appendix A explicitly includes this anamorphic factor.

For fixed object-screen separation $L>4f$, a converging thin lens focuses at two positions separated by $d=\sqrt{L^2-4Lf}$. Thus $f=(L^2-d^2)/(4L)$. The method finds focal length without needing to locate a thin lens's optical center precisely.

A Cassegrain arrangement places a secondary before the primary focus and returns light through a hole in the primary to a focus behind it. In the classical design the primary is parabolic and the secondary convex hyperbolic. The compact arrangement has a long effective focal length; its classical implementation retains off-axis coma.

Chromatic aberration is wavelength-dependent imaging caused by optical dispersion. Axial chromatic aberration changes focal length with wavelength; lateral chromatic aberration changes image scale.

A collimator turns light from a source near its focus into a nearly parallel beam. A slit of width $x$ produces an angular width approximately $x/f$, where $f$ is the focal length.

At fixed incidence angle, differentiating the grating equation gives $d\beta /d\lambda =m/(d\cos \beta )$. A camera with focal length $f$ therefore has local focal-plane dispersion $q=fm/(d\cos \beta )$ near its optical axis. With coordinate $X=f\tan (\beta -{\beta }_0)$, the full derivative is $q=f{\sec }^2(\beta -{\beta }_0)m/(d\cos \beta )$.

The optical power is reciprocal focal length. For thin lenses in contact, their powers add.

In a classical Cassegrain reflector, a concave parabolic primary sends light toward an intermediate focus, but a convex hyperbolic secondary intercepts it before it reaches that focus. The secondary returns the beam through a central hole in the primary to a focal plane behind the primary. The two relevant foci of the secondary’s hyperbola are the primary’s would-be focus and the final focus.

The secondary magnifies the effective focal length, giving a compact tube and convenient rear-mounted instruments. The classical conics correct on-axis spherical aberration, but not the off-axis coma, astigmatism or field curvature. There is secondary obscuration, diffraction from its supports, and sensitivity to mirror alignment. A long effective focal length is useful for a small angular image scale per detector pixel, but yields a small field for a fixed detector size.

A Gregorian telescope has a concave parabolic primary and a concave ellipsoidal secondary. Unlike the Cassegrain reflector, the secondary is beyond the primary focus: the rays cross that focus before reaching it. The two foci of the secondary’s ellipse are the intermediate focus and final rear focus, so the reflected rays return through the primary hole to the detector.

The real intermediate focus permits a field stop to reject unwanted light, and the two image inversions give an erect image. The rear focus is convenient and the effective focal length can be large. The secondary beyond prime focus makes the tube longer than the corresponding Cassegrain reflector, often with a larger secondary obstruction. The classical design retains off-axis coma, astigmatism and field curvature, and needs careful alignment.

Let the telescope and collimator have focal lengths $f_t,f_c$, and let $w=f_t\theta$ be the physical slit width. The collimated beam diameter in the dispersion direction is $A_c=f_{c}D/f_t$, so $w{A}_c/f_c=\theta D$.

The diffraction grating changes both the angular width and the beam diameter. At fixed wavelength, differentiating the grating equation gives $|d\beta /d\alpha |=\cos \alpha /\cos \beta$. Thus the anamorphic magnification of a grating givesIf $W$ is the illuminated surface length, its projected beam diameters are $A_c=W\cos \alpha$ and $A_{\mathrm{cam}}=W\cos \beta$. Multiplication cancels the anamorphic factors:ThereforeThis is a one-dimensional optical-invariant relation: a grating cannot independently magnify the slit and shrink the corresponding beam without compensating angular changes. The calculation uses local paraxial imaging about each instrument’s chief ray and an unclipped beam.

Let $u$ and $v$ be the real object and image distances from the thin lens. The object-screen separation gives $u+v=L$, and the thin lens equation gives $uv=fL$. Thus the two lens positions solveTheir separation is $d=u_{+}-u_{-}=\sqrt{L^2-4fL}$, soThis is the Bessel lens displacement method for measuring focal length. It uses the screen-object separation and the displacement between two sharp-image settings, reducing the need to locate the lens's effective optical center. It assumes the thin-lens or corresponding principal-plane approximation; $L>4f$ is what provides two distinct real-image settings.

Write ${\Phi }_i=1/f_{id}$ and $\Phi =1/f_d$. The achromatic doublet power balance isSolving these two linear equations gives ${\Phi }_1=\Phi V_{1d}/(V_{1d}-V_{2d})$ and ${\Phi }_2=-\Phi V_{2d}/(V_{1d}-V_{2d})$. Taking reciprocals gives the required focal lengths:The design requires distinct Abbe numbers; identical relative dispersion cannot yield a nonzero total achromatic power from this two-element thin model.

At the intermediate $d$ reference wavelength, the lensmaker's equation gives $1/f_{id}={\rho }_i(n_{id}-1)$. Therefore the curvature-factor ratio from the previous part impliesand henceThe last equality uses the Abbe number definition and expresses the achromatic doublet power balance in terms of component focal lengths.

A thin lens is modeled with negligible thickness relative to its object and image distances. For real conjugate distances $u,v>0$, it obeys $1/u+1/v=1/f$, with focal length $f$.