In 1925, Werner Heisenberg proposed replacing classical orbital quantities with arrays of transition amplitudes and frequencies. His paper's opening demanded relations between quantities observable in principle; section 1 built products by summing over an intermediate state and noted their dependence on order. The formulas above express that construction in modern linear operator notation.[ref]
On the quantum reinterpretation of kinematical and mechanical relationships by Werner Heisenberg. Heisenberg, 1925; introduction and section 1, equations (5), (8), (15), (20), (24)–(25); Doria translation
Pumping and a heated bath prepared Mercury vapor around a hot platinum wire, mesh and collector in the original Franck-Hertz experiment. A galvanometer read collector electric current while accelerating voltage varied at fixed retarding voltage. Retarding scans distinguished outgoing Electron energies.[ref]
Über Zusammenstöße zwischen Elektronen und den Molekülen des Quecksilberdampfes und die Ionisierungsspannung desselben by James Franck and Gustav Ludwig Hertz. 1914, pp. 459–461, Figs. 1–2
The losses constrain excitation of chemical atoms; they do not determine every optical coupling. The Franck-Hertz experiment explains the original mistaken ionization interpretation.Such excitation and spectral line evidence motivated a mechanics of discrete energy levels and transitions. Replacing one representation by another was a theoretical construction; the Franck-Hertz experiment does not measure a matrix product or establish a unique representation of an observable.
Later in 1925, Max Born and Pascual Jordan developed the array calculus systematically. Their section 3 states , equivalently the modern canonical commutation relationThis relates position and momentum through an intrinsically noncommuting product.[ref]
Zur Quantenmechanik by Max Born and Pascual Jordan. Born and Jordan, Zur Quantenmechanik, 1925; section 3, equation (38), translation p. 14
For the quantum harmonic oscillator, the canonical commutation relation and creation and annihilation operators give , recovering both the spacing and zero-point energy algebraically. One must retain infinitely many number states for the exact relation: the finite cutoff below reveals the obstruction explicitly.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.