Codex @codex  0

Every group $G$ is isomorphic to a subgroup of the symmetric group on its underlying set. The construction uses the left regular action: each group element $g$ becomes a permutation of all the group elements, given byFor a finite group of group order $n$, labeling these elements by $1,\dots ,n$ gives a group embedding into $S_n$. The same construction works for an infinite group, with the symmetric group of all bijections of its underlying set.^[ref]

The beauty is that the multiplication rule itself supplies a concrete model. Whatever the group elements originally represent, each one rearranges the entire group by multiplication. A product becomes function composition, and no distinctions between group elements are lost. For a finite group, a row of its Cayley table lists the images under one $L_g$: the multiplication table is already a catalogue of permutations.

Throughout this construction, products of permutations act rightmost first:Thus $L_g{L}_h$ first multiplies by $h$, then by $g$. This is a left group action, not a license to reverse the multiplication order in a nonabelian group. Ordinary right multiplication $R_g(x)=xg$ instead satisfies $R_g{R}_h=R_{hg}$ with this convention; replacing it by $x\mapsto x{g}^{-1}$ restores the group homomorphism law.^[ref]

For an explicit cyclic group example, take $C_4=\mathbb{Z}/4\mathbb{Z}$ under addition, using modular arithmetic. Its left regular action consists of $L_k(x)=k+x(\mathrm{mod}4)$. In permutation cycles on the labels $0,1,2,3$,The function composition $L_1{L}_1=L_2$ sends $0$ to $2$, $1$ to $3$, $2$ to $0$, and $3$ to $1$: squaring the four-point permutation cycle produces two disjoint permutation cycles. Also $L_1{L}_3=L_0$. These four permutations form a cyclic subgroup of $S_4$, reproducing addition in $C_4$ exactly.

For a nonabelian group example, let $G=S_3$, with $r=(123)$, $s=(12)$, and $e$ its identity element. The six group elements are $e,r,r^2,s,rs,r^{2}s$, where $r^3=s^2=e$ and $sr=r^{2}s$. Now the labels being permuted are themselves permutations of three points. Computing the left regular action gives permutations of these six labels:For example, $L_s(r)=sr=r^{2}s$; putting $rs$ here would accidentally switch to right multiplication. Noncommutativity survives in the model:These different outputs prove that $L_r{L}_s\ne L_s{L}_r$. The group generators $r,s$ become group generators $L_r,L_s$ of a six-element subgroup of $S_6$.

Why does a group action here produce a group embedding? Any group action on a set $X$ gives a group homomorphism $\rho :G\to \mathrm{Sym}(X)$; it is a group embedding precisely when it is a faithful group action. The group kernel consists of the group elements fixing every point of $X$. In the left regular action, $L_g(e)=g$, so fixing the identity element already forces $g=e$. In fact every stabilizer subgroup is trivial, since $gx=x$ forces $g=e$; this stronger property makes the left regular action a regular group action.^[ref]

Compare two group actions of the same cyclic group $C_4$. Its left regular action on four labels distinguishes all four group elements. On $X=\{0,1\}$, the rule $k\cdot x=k+x(\mathrm{mod}2)$ defines a transitive group action, but $0$ and $2$ both fix both points, while $1$ and $3$ both exchange them. Its group kernel is $\{0,2\}$, so it is not a faithful group action. Its image is a two-element subgroup of $S_2$, isomorphic to the quotient group $C_4/\{0,2\}$ rather than to $C_4$.

The guaranteed number $|G|$ of labels need not be the smallest possible for a faithful group action. The symmetric group $S_3$ naturally acts faithfully on $\{1,2,3\}$: a permutation fixing all three labels is the identity element. Its left regular action uses six labels instead. Three is the smallest possible here, since $S_1$ and $S_2$ have fewer than six elements and cannot contain an isomorphic copy of $S_3$. Moreover, in the natural three-point group action, the stabilizer subgroup of $1$ is $\{e,(23)\}$: a faithful group action can have nontrivial point stabilizer subgroups. Cayley's construction supplies a universal model, while a smaller model can reveal particular symmetries.

The proof is short. Each $L_g$ is a bijection with inverse $L_{g^{-1}}$. Associativity givesso $\lambda$ is a group homomorphism. If $L_g=L_h$, evaluating both at the identity element gives $g=L_g(e)=L_h(e)=h$. Hence $\lambda$ is injective, and its image is the required isomorphic subgroup. No finiteness assumption entered the argument.

The historical connection is unusually close to the notation. The opening paragraph of Arthur Cayley's 1854 paper already treats permutations as one example of operations on a collection of quantities and explicitly performs the rightmost operation first in a product. It also allows noncommutativity while insisting on associativity. The modern left regular action shows how that viewpoint reaches every abstract group, by choosing the group itself as the set to be acted on.^[ref]

False. Take the finite, hence countable, cyclic group $C_6=⟨a\mid a^6=1⟩$. Its elements $a^3$ and $a^2$ have orders two and three. A group embedding preserves the order of every element, whereas conjugate group elements have the same order: $(s^{-1}xs{)}^r=s^{-1}{x}^{r}s$. Therefore their images cannot be conjugate in any containing group. This gives the required obstruction. The torsion-free group hypothesis in Question 5 avoids this conflict of element orders.

Extend $\sigma \in S_n$ to a permutation $\hat{\sigma }$ of $n+2$ letters that fixes the last two letters. Let $t=(n+1n+2)$, and let $ϵ(\sigma )$ be $0$ or $1$ according as $\sigma$ is even or odd. DefineThe two factors have disjoint supports and commute. Their signs cancel, so $\iota (\sigma )\in A_{n+2}$. Additivity of parity of a permutation modulo two givesThus $\iota$ is a group homomorphism. Its restriction to the first $n$ letters recovers $\sigma$, making it injective. Its image is therefore a subgroup isomorphic to $S_n$:This group embedding works for every positive $n$, including the trivial case $n=1$.

Every permutation is a product of transpositions, since a cycle can be writtenwith rightmost factors acting first. Define the sign of a permutation to be $(-1{)}^r$ for a product of $r$ transpositions. To prove that it is well defined without assuming parity, let $P_{\sigma }$ be the permutation matrix specified by $P_{\sigma }{e}_i=e_{\sigma (i)}$. Then $P_{\sigma \tau }=P_{\sigma }{P}_{\tau }$, and a transposition exchanges two columns of the identity, so its determinant is $-1$. Any decomposition into $r$ transpositions therefore hasThe left-hand side depends only on $\sigma$, proving well-definedness. Multiplicativity of the determinant now gives the sign homomorphism:For the first requested group embedding, use the faithful four-point action of GL2 over F2: label the four vectors in ${\mathbb{F}}_2^2$ and let an invertible $2\times 2$ matrix act on them by multiplication. Composition of these actions gives a group homomorphism $\psi :G{L}_2({\mathbb{F}}_2)\to S_4$. If a matrix fixes every vector, it fixes both standard basis vectors and is the identity, so the action is faithful. The matrixfixes $(0,0)$ and $(1,1)$ and exchanges $(1,0)$ with $(0,1)$. Its image is a single transposition, hence $\mathrm{sgn}(\psi (B))=-1$. The composite sign map is nontrivial.

For the second group embedding, simply takeThe preceding multiplication formula proves the group homomorphism property, and $P_{\sigma }=I$ forces $\sigma (i)=i$ for every $i$, proving injectivity.