Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 iii Paper 117 4 c Solution 2026-09-28
Put , with the absolute constant chosen sufficiently large below, and suppose for a contradiction that no with satisfies .
LetThe set is compact and convex, while is closed and convex, so is closed and convex. We use the following finite-dimensional form of the Hahn-Banach separation theorem: if a point lies outside a nonempty closed convex set, there is a linear functional whose value at the point is strictly greater than its supremum over that set. Identifying linear functionals on through the inner product, there is therefore a function such thatThe separating functional cannot have zero dual norm, so rescale it to make . Because is closed, convex, and symmetric, the finite-dimensional Bipolar theorem for a dual pair says that the unit ball of is precisely . Thus and .
The support function of is obtained by choosing where and where . In terms of the positive part of a real-valued function , the separating inequality becomesSince , pointwise we have , and hence
Apply the supplied polynomial approximation of the positive part to . If , then its uniform approximation error and implyThe constant function and belong to the dual unit ball. By the assumed submultiplicativity, for every . Dual seminorm therefore givesThe stated coefficient bound, with in chosen larger than the absolute constant in that bound, makes this last quantity at most . Together with the polynomial-approximation error, this contradicts . The required consequently exists. This proves the dense model theorem for a multiplicative test family.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 iii Paper 106 1 Solution Created 2026-09-28 Updated 2026-10-03
Mazur theorem says that the weak closure and norm closure of a convex subset of a real or complex normed space coincide. The norm closure is contained in the weak closure because every norm-continuous linear functional is norm-continuous. Conversely, if is outside the norm closure of a convex set , the Hahn-Banach separation theorem gives and a real number such thatThis weakly open separation shows that is outside the weak closure.
By definition,For each , regard as the bounded functional given by . Pointwise convergence makes the family pointwise bounded on the Banach space . The Uniform boundedness principle gives
Suppose first that . Every subsequence indexed by an infinite set also converges weakly to zero. Thus zero belongs to the weak closure of the convex hull of , and Mazur's theorem puts it in its norm closure. This gives the required finite convex combination of norm below any prescribed .
Conversely, if weak convergence fails, some and an infinite subsequence satisfy either throughout or throughout. Every convex combination from that subsequence then has norm at least , contradicting the stated property.
Now let the , , have pairwise disjoint supports and satisfy . For distinct terms,The convex-combination criterion therefore proves . This is weak convergence of bounded disjointly supported sequences in lp.
The final implication for a commutative unital C*-algebra is true. By the Commutative Gelfand--Naimark theorem, and its characters are the point evaluations. The hypotheses say that the uniformly bounded functions converge pointwise to zero. Every functional on is integration against a finite regular measure by the Riesz-Markov-Kakutani representation theorem; the dominated convergence theorem givesHence .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 iii Paper 106 4 a Solution Created 2026-09-28 Updated 2026-10-03
- if is nonempty open convex and , there are a continuous linear functional and with for every ;
- if is closed convex and , there are and with ;
- if is compact convex, is closed convex, and , there are and with , after changing the sign of if needed.
The Banach-Alaoglu theorem says that the closed unit ball of is compact in . Goldstine theorem says that the canonical image of the closed unit ball of a normed space is weak-star dense in the closed unit ball of .
Give its norm inherited from and defineIt is linear and contractive, and it is injective because separates points. Goldstine's theorem followed by restriction from to shows that is weak-star dense in : a functional on first extends norm-preservingly to , and elements of approximate that extension on every finite subset of .
The topology induced by on is exactly the given topology . By hypothesis is compact, so is weak-star compact and therefore closed in the Hausdorff space . Density now givesThus is surjective and maps closed unit ball onto closed unit ball, so it is an isometric isomorphism. Hence is a dual space. This is the compact norming dual-pair criterion.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 ii Paper 4 22F b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
Put , so . We show that the norm closure of the convex hull of every tailcontains zero. If it did not, the Hahn-Banach separation theorem would give a bounded linear functional , a real number , and, after multiplying by a complex scalar if necessary,for every in that closed convex hull. In particular for all . By the Riesz representation theorem, for some , contradicting .
Consequently, for every there is a finite convex combinationwith . DefineThen every is a convex combination of terms of the original sequence andThis is Mazur lemma in the present Hilbert-space setting.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 iii Paper 106 4 a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
For a real locally convex space , the continuous dual space consists of all continuous real-linear maps . If on a subspace , continuity gives seminorms and such thatThe right side is a continuous sublinear functional on . The dominated Hahn-Banach theorem extends to a linear satisfying the same bound, so .
If is closed and , the Hausdorff locally convex quotient has a continuous seminorm with . On , define and rescale so that . Hahn--Banach extends it to with and .
The separation of a point and an open convex set says that if is nonempty, open, and convex and , there is such thatTo prove it, choose , put , and let be its Minkowski functional. For , . Define on ; then . Hahn--Banach extends to . Since for , one has , proving the claim.
If is closed and convex and , a Hahn-Banach separation theorem gives and a real number separating from . The corresponding inverse image of an open interval is a weak neighbourhood of disjoint from , so is closed in .
The unit sphere of a normed space is norm closed. If is infinite-dimensional, every basic weak neighbourhood of an interior point constrains only finitely many functionals . Their common kernel contains a nonzero . Continuity of , together with its value below one at and divergence as , supplies with . Since all have the same values at and , every weak neighbourhood of meets . Points outside are separated from it by Hahn--Banach, so the weak closure of the unit sphere is exactly . In particular, is not weakly closed.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2026 iii Paper 106 4 Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
A linear map is a weakly compact operator when is relatively weakly compact. Every weakly compact subset of a Banach space is norm bounded, soThus even without assuming continuity initially, a weakly compact linear map is bounded.
The key bidual criterion isFor the forward implication, approximate weak-star by points using the Goldstine theorem. Weak compactness supplies a subnet for which converges weakly to some , while weak-star continuity of makes converge to . Hence . Conversely, if the displayed inclusion holds, the weak-star compact set lies in , where the inherited weak-star topology is the weak topology of . It is a weakly compact set containing .
If is weakly compact and , restriction of to defines . For ,so . The bidual criterion makes weakly compact. Conversely, if is weakly compact, then . Every annihilating is sent to zero, so every lies inThe criterion makes weakly compact. Hence is weakly compact exactly when is.
The bidual criterion also proves the structure of . It is closed under linear combinations. If in operator norm and every is weakly compact, then in norm; the canonical copy is norm closed, so is weakly compact. For bounded composable maps and , the image condition for proves the ideal property. Thus the weakly compact operators form a norm-closed operator ideal.
The Krein-Smulian theorem states that the norm-closed convex hull of a weakly compact set is weakly compact. To prove it, view as a compact Hausdorff space in its weak topology. The probability measures on form a weak-star compact subset of by the Banach-Alaoglu theorem. The barycentre mapis weak-star-to-weak continuous; scalar integration and weak compactness ensure that . Finitely supported probability measures are weak-star dense and their barycentres are precisely . The image of all probability measures is therefore the weak closure of , and it is weakly compact. A convex set has the same weak and norm closures by the Hahn-Banach separation theorem, proving the claim.
If is reflexive, is weakly compact and every bounded is weak-to-weak continuous, so is weakly compact. If is reflexive, every bounded subset of is relatively weakly compact, with the same conclusion. Thuswhenever either space is reflexive.
If and is nonreflexive, the Eberlein-Smulian theorem supplies a bounded sequence in with no weakly convergent subsequence. The formuladefines a bounded operator . Since , it cannot be weakly compact. Therefore .
This conclusion does not hold for every pair of nonreflexive spaces. Both and are nonreflexive, while the Pitt theorem says every bounded operator is compact and hence weakly compact. Thus
Separation from a closed convex cone 2026-10-06
For a closed convex cone in a finite-dimensional real inner product space and , there exists with and for all . Here is a direct proof. A nearest point exists by compactness after restricting to a sufficiently large ball. Differentiating squared distance along the segment towards gives . Using and shows . Set : then and . This is a conic form of the Hahn-Banach separation theorem.