For a simple spin-triplet p-wave pairing description, let the matrix , with complex number entries, map an orbital direction on the Fermi surface into a triplet gap vector . The indices refer to spin and orbital components. A scalar amplitude cannot retain all these relative orientations. Anthony James Leggett's account connects that extra structure to the magnetic responses of the different phases.[ref]
Here are two explicit idealizations, with a common positive scale and an overall quantum phase omitted. They show how odd orbital pairing can have either nodes or an isotropic gap. They do not calculate which state has the lower Helmholtz free energy.
Take a real unit vector in spin space and choose orthogonal orbital axes. The model has
It vanishes at the two polar directions and is largest at the equator. The orbital factor changes sign when is reversed, as required for the odd orbital part of spin-triplet p-wave pairing. Calling the phase A does not mean its order parameter is one real number.
Take a proper rotation matrix with real number entries. Then has
This odd linear orbital model has an isotropic gap magnitude. Isotropic gap magnitude does not require s-wave pairing: the spin components can rotate together with the orbital direction. Nor does the magnitude fix the relative spin-orbit orientation represented by .
For both displayed models, . The triplet gap matrix , written with Pauli matrices, satisfies
Thus these models give the same gap magnitude for the two spin branches. That last simplification would fail for a general complex triplet vector with a nonzero cross product. The displayed angular curves illustrate these specified matrices; they are not a microscopic derivation of the phase diagram.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.