Victor Franz Hess's 1912 series used two sealed, 3-mm-walled ionization chambers with Theodor Wulf's fiber electrometers. Karl Bergwitz suggested internal plating; Günther & Tegetmeyer improved focusing. Basket-mounted ground comparisons, insulation-loss measurements, simultaneous detectors and barograph-derived heights supplied checks. The highest flight reached 5350 m; its comparisons came from Vienna and after landing, without a launch-site baseline.[ref]
Über Beobachtungen der durchdringenden Strahlung bei sieben Freiballonfahrten by Victor Franz Hess. 1912, pp.1084-1085 apparatus and preparations; pp.1087-1088 seventh flight; English primary-text translation arxiv.org/pdf/1808.02927 pp.1-2, 5-6
A third, thin-walled chamber admitted ambient air. Hess multiplied its readings by , with pressure in millimeters of mercury, warning that vessel-wall contributions might violate this scaling. He recorded outside temperature but applied no absolute-temperature correction. Night flights, an eclipse and weather observations constrained alternatives to radiation from above; the eclipse argument addressed directly propagating solar radiation.[ref]
Über Beobachtungen der durchdringenden Strahlung bei sieben Freiballonfahrten by Victor Franz Hess. 1912, p.1085 pressure reduction; p.1086 eclipse; p.1088 temperature footnote; pp.1090-1091 inference; English translation pp.2-3, 6-8
The electrometers read gradual electric potential loss caused by continuing air ionization. The low-altitude dip and strong high-altitude rise favored an extraterrestrial contribution, without measuring proton composition.[ref]
Über Beobachtungen der durchdringenden Strahlung bei sieben Freiballonfahrten by Victor Franz Hess. 1912, pp.1089-1091 altitude averages and interpretation; English translation pp.7-8
An ionization chamber integrates electric charge: one energetic particle may create many ion pairs, several particles may contribute to one reading, and a photon can create charged particles in the gas or walls. A voltage-loss reading is therefore neither a count of primary cosmic rays nor a chemical analysis of them.Domenico Pacini supplied independent evidence: in June 1911 he compared a copper-box-enclosed electroscope at the sea surface and 3 m underwater, more than 300 m offshore above an 8-m-deep seabed. Reduced underwater ionization, stable electrical loss between runs, and a lake comparison supported an external contribution independent of soil radioactive decay. Water provided shielding; this established a different constraint from Hess's altitude comparison.[ref]
La radiazione penetrante alla superficie ed in seno alle acque by Domenico Pacini. Pacini's 1912 report, English translation pp.3-5, especially surface/underwater comparison and residual-ionization discussion; original Italian facsimile pp.9-14
From air ionization to electrometer discharge
. Original functional schematic and invented readout example for the ionization-chamber charge-loss model. The chamber drawing is not a dimensional reconstruction, and the plotted voltage traces are not Hess's measurements. Details. Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.
