Discovery of 51 Pegasi b 2026-10-18
Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz began observing 51 Pegasi in September 1994 and revisited its repeating Doppler spectroscopy signal in 1995. Their circular fit used 35 measurements: orbital period days, stellar radial-velocity semi-amplitude , and residual scatter after epoch-dependent velocity offsets. Apparently stable comparison stars checked the instrumental zero point. Low chromospheric stellar activity and an inferred roughly 30-day stellar rotation period argued against starspots; light curves and the spectral line bisector tested stellar pulsation. These checks favoured orbital motion but had finite sensitivity. The reported Jupiter masses was not a true mass. Stronger upper bounds used stellar-spin information and assumed spin–orbit alignment, limiting a nearly face-on binary star interpretation conditionally.[ref]
A Jupiter-mass companion to a solar-type star by Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz. Mayor and Queloz (1995), pp. 356–358, figures 2–4, table 1, and alternative interpretations; scan: wwelsh.sdsu.edu/CLASSES/ASTR510/PAPERS/Mayor-Queloz_51Peg.pdf
The hot Jupiter matters both for planetary migration and for how exoplanets are found. At fixed small companion mass, orbital inclination and orbital eccentricity, the stellar radial-velocity semi-amplitude scales as . Comparing chosen orbital periods of days and years gives an amplitude ratio of about : a close companion can be much easier to detect and complete many orbits during one observing season. Finding a giant planet close to its star also asks how its present orbit relates to where it formed. Doppler spectroscopy supplies a dynamical constraint; it does not by itself establish a formation pathway or measure the exoplanet's radius.
Keplerian radial-velocity curve 2026-10-18
A repeating Doppler shift contains more than an amplitude. For an isolated two-body problem, let be the true anomaly, the stellar argument of periapsis, the periapsis time and the constant system line-of-sight velocity. The companion's argument of periapsis differs by from , so mixing the two conventions reverses the orbital signal. With positive velocity for recession, choose the stellar line-of-sight coordinate positive away from the observer. Kepler's equation supplies the clock:Here is the mean anomaly and the eccentric anomaly. The time coordinate is uniform in , not in : an eccentric Kepler orbit runs fastest near periapsis.
To derive the velocity law without guessing a sinusoid, write the stellar orbital coordinates as and . Project toDifferentiating and substituting the true anomaly identities givesThe constant term makes the time average of the orbital velocity zero: returns to its original value after one orbital period. For this reduces to a sinusoid with an arbitrary phase origin; periapsis itself is then undefined. For , the largest and smallest velocities are , so is still half the peak-to-peak range, although the extrema need not be symmetric about .
For an original worked example, choose , days, , and . Taking one day as and , the binary mass function is . Its units check directly: . With adopted solar mass and Jupiter mass , solving the exact binary mass function gives
| Orbital inclination | Companion mass |
|---|
All three systems have the same chosen and therefore the same Doppler spectroscopy time series, despite different true masses. Exactly what remains fixed is ; alone is only the small-companion approximation. The value is the minimum mass. For this example the extrema are and relative to , and the periapsis value is . This is a chosen eccentric system, not a reconstruction of 51 Pegasi b.
