Discovery of 51 Pegasi b 2026-10-18
Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz began observing 51 Pegasi in September 1994 and revisited its repeating Doppler spectroscopy signal in 1995. Their circular fit used 35 measurements: orbital period days, stellar radial-velocity semi-amplitude , and residual scatter after epoch-dependent velocity offsets. Apparently stable comparison stars checked the instrumental zero point. Low chromospheric stellar activity and an inferred roughly 30-day stellar rotation period argued against starspots; light curves and the spectral line bisector tested stellar pulsation. These checks favoured orbital motion but had finite sensitivity. The reported Jupiter masses was not a true mass. Stronger upper bounds used stellar-spin information and assumed spin–orbit alignment, limiting a nearly face-on binary star interpretation conditionally.[ref]
The hot Jupiter matters both for planetary migration and for how exoplanets are found. At fixed small companion mass, orbital inclination and orbital eccentricity, the stellar radial-velocity semi-amplitude scales as . Comparing chosen orbital periods of days and years gives an amplitude ratio of about : a close companion can be much easier to detect and complete many orbits during one observing season. Finding a giant planet close to its star also asks how its present orbit relates to where it formed. Doppler spectroscopy supplies a dynamical constraint; it does not by itself establish a formation pathway or measure the exoplanet's radius.
A repeating Doppler shift contains more than an amplitude. For an isolated two-body problem, let be the true anomaly, the stellar argument of periapsis, the periapsis time and the constant system line-of-sight velocity. The companion's argument of periapsis differs by from , so mixing the two conventions reverses the orbital signal. With positive velocity for recession, choose the stellar line-of-sight coordinate positive away from the observer. Kepler's equation supplies the clock:
Here is the mean anomaly and the eccentric anomaly. The time coordinate is uniform in , not in : an eccentric Kepler orbit runs fastest near periapsis.
To derive the velocity law without guessing a sinusoid, write the stellar orbital coordinates as and . Project to
Differentiating and substituting the true anomaly identities gives
The constant term makes the time average of the orbital velocity zero: returns to its original value after one orbital period. For this reduces to a sinusoid with an arbitrary phase origin; periapsis itself is then undefined. For , the largest and smallest velocities are , so is still half the peak-to-peak range, although the extrema need not be symmetric about .
For an original worked example, choose , days, , and . Taking one day as and , the binary mass function is . Its units check directly: . With adopted solar mass and Jupiter mass , solving the exact binary mass function gives
Orbital inclination Companion mass
All three systems have the same chosen and therefore the same Doppler spectroscopy time series, despite different true masses. Exactly what remains fixed is ; alone is only the small-companion approximation. The value is the minimum mass. For this example the extrema are and relative to , and the periapsis value is . This is a chosen eccentric system, not a reconstruction of 51 Pegasi b.
Figure 1.
A chosen eccentric radial-velocity curve and the exact mass–inclination ambiguity
. The left panel compares eccentric and circular models with the same period and semi-amplitude. Every mass and inclination on the right gives the eccentric model on the left for the stated fixed stellar mass. Details.