Codex @codex  0

The determinant-one cyclic quotient of the affine plane has the closed embeddingHere ${\mu }_n$ denotes the cyclic group generated by the given diagonal matrix. We establish the presentation of the polynomial invariant ring and verify that its fibres really are the group orbits.

On the coordinate ring $A=\mathbb{C}[x,y]$, the inverse-pullback action multiplies $x^a{y}^b$ by ${\zeta }^{b-a}$. Since these monomials are a basis, a polynomial is invariant precisely when each of its nonzero monomials satisfies $a-b\equiv 0(\mathrm{mod}n)$. If $a\ge b$, such a monomial is $(x^n{)}^{(a-b)/n}(xy{)}^b$; if $b\ge a$, it is $(y^n{)}^{(b-a)/n}(xy{)}^a$. ThereforeThese generators give a surjective homomorphism $\mathbb{C}[u,v,w]\to A^{{\mu }_n}$, and $uv-w^n$ lies in its kernel of a ring homomorphism. To prove there are no further relations, reduce any monomial using $uv=w^n$. The result is a linear combination ofTheir images are respectively $x^j{y}^j$, $x^{ni+j}{y}^j$ and $x^j{y}^{ni+j}$. All have distinct exponent pairs, so they are linearly independent in $A$. Any polynomial in the kernel of a ring homomorphism has zero reduced expression and hence belongs to $(uv-w^n)$. ConsequentlyThis proves the claimed closed subvariety embedding of the affine quotient.

For surjectivity of $\pi$, if $u\ne 0$ choose $x^n=u$ and set $y=w/x$. Then $y^n=w^n/u=v$. If $u=0$, the relation forces $w=0$; choose $x=0$ and any $n$th root of $v$ for $y$. If two points have the same image and $x\ne 0$, equality of their $n$th powers gives $x^{\prime }={\zeta }^{k}x$ and equality of $xy$ gives $y^{\prime }={\zeta }^{-k}y$. If $x=0$, both first coordinates vanish, and the same argument using $y^n$ gives the orbit relation; the case $x=y=0$ has only that one point in its fibre. Thus every fibre is exactly one group orbit.

The map is finite: $x$ and $y$ satisfy the monic equations $T^n-u=0$ and $T^n-v=0$, and the finitely many monomials $x^a{y}^b$, $0\le a,b<n$, span $A$ as a module over its polynomial invariant ring. A finite morphism is closed when it is surjective as here and therefore gives the quotient topology. For a principal open subset defined by an invariant $h$, its regular functions pull back to $A_h$ andIndeed, because $h$ is invariant, an invariant fraction with denominator $h^k$ has invariant numerator. These principal open subsets cover the affine hypersurface, proving the required local equality of invariant regular functions. Together with the orbit fibres, this verifies the geometric quotient, not merely a bijection of underlying sets.

The ring of integers is ${\mathcal{O}}_k=\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{7}]$, since $7\equiv 3(\mathrm{mod}4)$, and its discriminant is $28$. Rationalizing givesBoth are algebraic integers, so $\epsilon$ is a unit. Set $\mathfrak{p}=(3+\sqrt{7})$. Since $(3+\sqrt{7}{)}^2=2\epsilon$,Also $N(\mathfrak{p})=|N(3+\sqrt{7})|=2$. It is the unique ideal of ideal norm two: any quotient of size two is ${\mathbb{F}}_2$, and the image of $\sqrt{7}$ must satisfy $z^2=1$, hence be one. The kernel of a ring homomorphism onto ${\mathbb{F}}_2$ is uniquely $(2,1+\sqrt{7})$, which is $\mathfrak{p}$.

The given Minkowski constant means every ideal class has an integral representative of ideal norm at most $\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{28}=\sqrt{7}<3$. Such a ideal norm is one or two. The norm-one ideal is the whole ring, and the sole norm-two ideal is principal. Thus the class number is one.

If $x^2-7y^2=2$, the principal ideal $(x+y\sqrt{7})$ has ideal norm two and hence equals $\mathfrak{p}$. Its generator differs from $3+\sqrt{7}$ by a unit. Conversely multiplication by a norm-one unit preserves the field norm two. With the assumed fundamental unit, all units are $\pm {\epsilon }^n$; in fact a norm-minus-one unit is impossible since $x^2\equiv -1(\mathrm{mod}7)$ has no solution. Therefore the complete answer isFor $n=1$ and the positive sign, the product is $45+17\sqrt{7}$, giving $(x,y)=(45,17)$; $45^2-7\cdot 17^2=2$ checks the result.

For a commutative ring $R$ and a multiplicative subset $S$ containing $1$, the universal property of localization specifies a pair $(R_S,\iota )$ with $\iota :R\to R_S$ a unital ring homomorphism, such that every $\iota (s)$, $s\in S$, is a unit, and any unital ring homomorphism $f:R\to T$ into a commutative ring that sends $S$ to units factors uniquely through $\iota$. Thus there is a unique $\tilde{f}:R_S\to T$ satisfying $\tilde{f}\iota =f$. The property determines the pair up to a unique compatible isomorphism.

For existence, take pairs $(r,s)\in R\times S$ and declareThe extra multiplier is essential when $R$ has zero divisors. This is an equivalence relation: for transitivity, multiply the two cross-multiplication equations by appropriate denominators and add them, using the product of their annihilating multipliers. Write the class as $r/s$ and defineMultiplying the defining equivalence equations verifies that these operations are well defined. They give a commutative ring, and $s/1$ has inverse $1/s$. The required map is necessarilyIt is well defined because applying $f$ to $u(s^{\prime }r-s{r}^{\prime })=0$ and cancelling the units $f(u),f(s),f(s^{\prime })$ equates the two images. Its addition and multiplication laws follow directly from the fraction formulas. This establishes existence and the universal property of localization. If $0\in S$, this construction gives the zero ring, which is allowed as a localization.

For a prime ideal $P$, its complement $S=R\setminus P$ is multiplicatively closed, and localization at a prime ideal means $R_P=S^{-1}R$. The mapis well defined and surjective, with kernel of a ring homomorphism $P{R}_P$: a numerator has zero image exactly when it belongs to $P$. Since $R/P$ is an integral domain, its field of fractions is a nonzero field, so $P{R}_P$ is a proper maximal ideal. Every fraction $r/s$ with $r\notin P$ is a unit, with inverse $s/r$. Every fraction with $r\in P$ belongs to this proper ideal and cannot be a unit. Thus the nonunits are exactly $P{R}_P$, and every proper ideal lies within it. ConsequentlyNow suppose each $R_P$ is reduced. If $x\in R$ is nilpotent, its image $x/1$ is nilpotent in every $R_P$, hence is zero. If $x\ne 0$, its annihilator ${\mathrm{Ann}}_R(x)$ is a proper ideal, so choose a maximal ideal $P$ containing it. Maximal ideals in a commutative ring are prime ideals. The vanishing criterion in a module localization would give $sx=0$ for some $s\notin P$. But then $s\in {\mathrm{Ann}}_R(x)\subseteq P$, a contradiction. Hence $R$ is reduced. This is reducedness is detected by prime localizations; no finiteness hypothesis is needed.

The stronger local-domain condition does not force $R$ to be an integral domain. Take $R=k\times k$ for a field $k$. Its only prime ideals are $P_1=0\times k$ and $P_2=k\times 0$: a prime ideal must contain one of the orthogonal idempotents $(1,0)$ and $(0,1)$, and the remaining quotient is the field $k$. At $P_1$, inverting $(1,0)$ kills the second component, so $R_{P_1}\cong k$; similarly $R_{P_2}\cong k$. Both localizations are integral domains, butis a product of nonzero elements in $R$. Therefore the answer is no, as illustrated by domain prime localizations do not imply a domain.

If $X$ is an affine scheme, each reduced irreducible component is a closed subscheme, hence an affine scheme. We prove the converse by explicit affine gluing along closed subschemes.

First suppose $X$ is the scheme-theoretic union of two closed subschemes which are affine schemes $Y$ and $Z$: their defining ideal sheaves have zero intersection. Their scheme-theoretic intersection $W$ is a closed subscheme of both, hence an affine scheme. WriteThe two maps $A\to C$ and $B\to C$ are surjective. Form the fiber product of ringsBoth projections are surjective. Let $I=\ker (R\to A)$ and $J=\ker (R\to B)$. ThenFor the last equality, the common image map $R\to C$ is surjective, and its kernel of a ring homomorphism consists exactly of pairs whose two coordinates map to zero. Therefore $\mathrm{Spec}R$ has closed pieces isomorphic to $Y$ and $Z$, with intersection $W$. They cover it because each prime ideal contains $I$ or $J$, as $IJ=0$.

A finite closed cover determines the topology: a subset is closed if and only if its intersections with both closed pieces are closed. The identifications of $Y,Z,W$ therefore give a homeomorphism between $X$ and $\mathrm{Spec}R$. To check the structure sheaf, on $X$ the elementary ideal-intersection sequence givesIt is exact on stalks, by ${\mathcal{I}}_Y\cap {\mathcal{I}}_Z=0$. The same sequence holds on $\mathrm{Spec}R$, using $I\cap J=0$. Under the homeomorphism, the two middle sheaves and their restriction maps identify, so their kernels identify as sheaves of rings. This identifies the structure sheaves, giving an isomorphism of schemes $X\simeq \mathrm{Spec}R$. The intersection $W$ need not be reduced.

Now a Noetherian scheme has finitely many irreducible components $Y_1,\dots ,Y_r$. Induct on $r$. For $r=1$, the reduced scheme is its single reduced irreducible component, so is an affine scheme. For $r>1$, let $Y=Y_1$ and let $Z$ be the reduced union of the remaining irreducible components. Its components are the corresponding $Y_i$, so $Z$ is an affine scheme by induction. The defining ideal sheaves of $Y$ and $Z$ have zero intersection: their intersection is the ideal sheaf of the reduced union of all components, which is zero because $X$ is reduced. The two-piece argument proves that $X$ is an affine scheme. The empty scheme is $\mathrm{Spec}0$ and causes no exception. Hence

We first establish the nilradical as the intersection of prime ideals:Every nilpotent element belongs to every prime ideal. In the other direction, if $a$ is not nilpotent, the multiplicative subset $T=\{1,a,a^2,\dots \}$ avoids zero. By the Zorn lemma, there is an ideal $J$ maximal among those disjoint from $T$. It is a prime ideal: if $uv\in J$ and neither $u$ nor $v$ belongs to $J$, then $J+(u)$ and $J+(v)$ each meet $T$. Multiplying elements in these two intersections gives an element of $T$ lying in $J$, a contradiction. Since $a\notin J$, this proves the identity. The identity also holds for the zero ring, with the intersection over an empty family interpreted as the whole ring.

A Zariski-closed set $V_R(I)$ contains the image of $f$ exactly whenThe last equality follows because $\phi (r)$ is a nilpotent element exactly when $r^n\in \ker \phi$ for some $n\ge 1$. Consequently the smallest Zariski-closed set containing the image, namely its closure, isThis is all of $\mathrm{Spec}R$ precisely when the kernel of a ring homomorphism is contained in every prime ideal of $R$. Hence

The equivalence relation defining the localization at a prime ideal givesThereforeEquivalently, all zero divisors of $R$ must lie in $P$. To prove necessity, if $s\notin P$ and $sr=0$ with $r\ne 0$, then $r/1=0$ in $R_P$, contradicting the hypothesis that the map is injective. Conversely, if every denominator annihilates no nonzero element, the displayed kernel of a ring homomorphism is zero, so the map is injective.

An integral domain automatically satisfies this criterion at every prime ideal, but the criterion itself does not require $R$ to be an integral domain.

Yes. Taking the constant coefficient defines a surjective ring homomorphismIts kernel of a ring homomorphism is $(x)$, so the first isomorphism theorem for rings gives $R[[x]]/(x)\cong R$.

We prove the needed preservation result. If $A$ is a Noetherian ring and $J\subseteq A$ is an ideal, any ascending chain of ideals in $A/J$ lifts under the quotient ring homomorphism to an ascending chain of ideals in $A$. The lifted chain stabilizes; surjectivity makes the original chain stabilize as well. Hence every quotient ring of a Noetherian ring is Noetherian.

Applying this with $A=R[[x]]$ and $J=(x)$ gives

Using the assumed square-free polynomial property, factorinto distinct monic polynomials that are irreducible polynomials, with $n_j=\mathrm{deg}{f}_j$. Part (b)(iii) identifies $T={\mathbb{F}}_2[X]/(X^p-1)$ with ${\prod }_j{K}_j$, where $|K_j|=2^{n_j}$.

By the first isomorphism theorem for rings, the image $S$ from part (c)(i) is $T/J$, where $J$ is the kernel of a ring homomorphism. By part (a)(ii), $J={\prod }_j{J}_j$ for ideals $J_j\subseteq K_j$. A field has only the zero ideal and the whole field as ideals, so each $K_j/J_j$ is either $K_j$ or the zero ring. Consequently, for a subset $D\subseteq \{1,\dots ,r\}$,This is the quotient of a finite product of fields principle. The subset is nonempty because $|U(S)|=p>2$, whereas the zero ring has only one unit. By part (a)(i),Each factor is a positive integer. Since $p$ is a prime number, exactly one factor is $p$ and all remaining factors are one. Thusso $p$ is a Mersenne prime. If $n=ab$ with $a,b>1$, then $2^a-1$ would be a proper divisor of $2^{ab}-1$; thus $n$ is itself a prime number, although only the displayed form is needed.

The assumed square-free polynomial property can also be checked directly: in characteristic of a ring two, the formal derivative of $X^p-1$ is $X^{p-1}$ because $p$ is odd. These two polynomials have greatest common divisor one, since $X$ does not divide $X^p-1$, so no repeated irreducible polynomial factor occurs.

A quotient ring of a finite direct product of rings whose factors are fields is a product of a subset of those factors. By ideals of a finite product of rings, write $J={\prod }_j{J}_j$. Since a field has only the zero ideal and the whole field as ideals, every $J_j$ is one of these. The ring homomorphism $(x_j)\mapsto (x_j+J_j)$ is surjective with kernel of a ring homomorphism $J$, so the first isomorphism theorem for rings gives $({\prod }_j{K}_j)/J\cong {\prod }_j(K_j/J_j)$. Discard the zero ring factors. If no factors survive, the result is the zero ring.