Lagrange's theorem states that, for a finite group and a subgroup ,
To prove it, define an equivalence relation by when . Its classes are the left cosets , which therefore partition . Left multiplication by gives a bijection , so every coset has elements. Counting this partition gives the formula; in particular divides . Applying the theorem to the cyclic subgroup generated by an element shows that its order of a group element divides .
Write the given order-two normal subgroup as . Conjugation must preserve and cannot send its nonidentity element to the identity, so for all . Thus is in the center of a group: a normal subgroup of order two is central.
Choose . By Lagrange's theorem, its order of a group element is , or . It cannot have order two: since is central, the four distinct elements would form a subgroup of order four, whereas does not divide for odd . If has order , it already generates . Otherwise has order , commutes with , and implies . Hence both and divide , so has order . In either case
For a group action of a finite group on a set and a point , the orbit-stabilizer theorem is
where is the stabilizer subgroup. The map is well defined because elements of the same coset act identically on . If , then , so their cosets agree; every orbit point has the form , giving surjectivity. This is a bijection. Lagrange's theorem, for any subgroup , yields the counting formula.
Apply the conjugation action of the finite p-group to its nontrivial normal subgroup . Normality ensures the action stays inside . The singleton orbits of a group action are exactly the elements of . Every larger orbit of a group action has size a positive power of , by the orbit-stabilizer theorem and Lagrange's theorem. Therefore
Since is nontrivial, its order is divisible by . The intersection contains the identity and has cardinality a positive multiple of , so it contains a nonidentity element. This proves the central intersection property of normal subgroups of finite p-groups.
For the proper subgroup , let act by left multiplication on the left cosets . A coset is fixed by every exactly when . Both groups have the same finite size, so this inclusion is equality; the fixed cosets are precisely those with . Hence their number is . All non-singleton orbits of a group action have size divisible by , so
Since is proper, is a positive power of greater than one. The fixed-coset count is nonzero, because itself is fixed, and is divisible by . Therefore the normalizer strictly contains :
This is the normalizer condition for finite p-groups. The proof also covers , whose action fixes all cosets.
Since , the number of Sylow subgroups for divides and is modulo , hence is or . In the first case the unique subgroup is a nontrivial proper normal subgroup.
In the second case the subgroups of order have pairwise trivial intersection: two such subgroups sharing a nonidentity element would both be generated by it. They account for nonidentity elements of order . Exactly elements, including the identity, remain. Every Sylow subgroup for has order , and all its elements lie among these remaining elements, by Lagrange's theorem. It must therefore be precisely that set. The Sylow subgroup for is unique and hence normal. In either case is not a simple group.
A finite nonabelian simple group cannot be a p-group: a nontrivial finite p-group has nontrivial centre of a group, since its class equation makes every noncentral conjugacy class size divisible by , and hence makes the centre size a positive multiple of . That centre is a normal subgroup, so must be the whole group if is a simple group, making it abelian; an abelian simple group has prime order. Therefore every Sylow subgroup here is nontrivial and proper. It cannot be normal, so .
To obtain a simple group embedding from Sylow conjugation, the conjugation action on Sylow subgroups gives a group homomorphism . This group action is transitive by the Sylow theorems and is nontrivial since . Its kernel of a group homomorphism is a normal subgroup, so the defining property of a simple group makes the kernel of a group homomorphism trivial: is an embedding. Now compose with the sign of a permutation . A nontrivial composite would again be injective because is a simple group, embedding in a group of order two, impossible for a nonabelian group. Thus lies in the alternating group . By Lagrange's theorem,
The argument only invokes the factorial formula once ; the impossible case itself is also excluded by the embedding.
Use the class equation for the action of on itself by conjugation:
where the sum runs over noncentral conjugacy classes. By Lagrange's theorem, each noncentral class has size a positive power of greater than one. Thus . Since the identity element belongs to the center of a group,
For , the possible orders of the center of a group are . Order would make an abelian group. Order would make the quotient group have prime order and hence be a cyclic group. But a cyclic quotient by the center forces to be Abelian: if generates the quotient, any two elements are and with , and their products commute. Both larger orders contradict the hypothesis. Consequently
Let act by left multiplication on the set of left cosets. This gives a group action homomorphism
Its kernel
is a normal subgroup of , and the first isomorphism theorem gives . By Lagrange's theorem, divides . The image acts transitively on the cosets, so the orbit-stabilizer theorem shows that divides ; in particular,
Now suppose is nonabelian and simple. Since is proper, the coset action is nontrivial, so . Simplicity gives , and embeds into . Composing with the sign homomorphism gives
Its kernel is normal. A nontrivial map would embed the simple group into the abelian group of order two, which is impossible because is nonabelian. The sign is therefore always , so
Lagrange's theorem states that for a subgroup of a finite group ,
where is the index of a subgroup, the number of its left cosets. In particular, divides .
The cyclic subgroup consists of the distinct elements , where . Every power reduces to one of these by the Euclidean division, and a repetition among them would contradict minimality of . Thus . Applying Lagrange's theorem gives
By Lagrange's theorem, the index of a subgroup is . Thus the set of left cosets has three elements, and the preceding group action yields a group homomorphism after labelling them.
Its image is a subgroup of , so its order divides . By the first isomorphism theorem, also divides . Hence its order divides , giving possibilities and . The action on cosets is transitive: sends to . It cannot be the trivial action on a three-element set, so the image does not have order . Therefore
It follows that . Part (b)(i) gives , and ; equal finite orders force equality. A kernel of a group homomorphism is a normal subgroup, so
This is an instance of the fact that a subgroup of index the smallest prime divisor is normal.
The order of a group element is the smallest positive integer with . Such an integer exists in a finite group: two powers in must agree, and cancellation gives a positive power equal to .
By minimality, are distinct. Every integer power of is one of them, by division of its exponent by . They form the cyclic subgroup
Applying Lagrange's theorem to this subgroup gives
Lagrange's theorem states that if is a subgroup of a finite group , then
where the index of a subgroup is the number of distinct left cosets.
Every lies in , since . By i, distinct left cosets are disjoint, so these sets form a partition of a set . Each has cardinality : the function from to is a bijection, with inverse , by cancellation in a group. Counting the elements in this finite partition of a set gives , proving the theorem.
Let , with a prime number, and choose . By Lagrange's theorem, the order of a group element divides and is greater than one. It is therefore , and . Hence a group of prime cardinality is a cyclic group.
The converse is false: the cyclic group has four elements, and is not a prime number.
The complete classification up to group isomorphism is
Here is the trivial group. The prime number cases follow from i. For four elements, an element of order of a group element four generates . If there is none, Lagrange's theorem makes every nonidentity element have order of a group element two. Then iv produces a four-element subgroup, which must be all of , giving the Klein four-group.
For six elements, an element of order of a group element six gives . Suppose there is none. If there were no element of order of a group element three either, all nonidentity elements would have order of a group element two. Part iv would then produce a subgroup of cardinality four, contradicting Lagrange's theorem. Thus choose of order of a group element three. There is also an involution : otherwise the five nonidentity elements could be paired into distinct pairs , impossible for an odd number of elements.
The subgroup has index of a subgroup two, so it is a normal subgroup. Indeed, for , both and are the complement of , and for both equal . Consequently is either or . The first possibility makes commute, and then has order of a group element six: forces , so both and divide . This contradicts our assumption. Therefore
Every element is uniquely or , with , and the relation determines all their products. Sending to and to gives a group isomorphism with the symmetric group . This completes the classification of groups of order at most six.
Of these groups, exactly embed in . Concrete subgroups are
There is no subgroup, since does not divide . There is no subgroup either: the order of a group element in a symmetric group is the least common multiple of the lengths in its disjoint cycle decomposition, and on four letters the only possibilities are .
The orbit-stabilizer theorem identifies the orbit of a group action of with the set of left cosets of . Explicitly, there is a bijection
Here denotes a set of cosets; it is not asserted to be a quotient group. To prove the identification, observe that
This equivalence proves both well-definedness and injectivity. Every element of the orbit of a group action has the form , proving surjectivity.
In particular, for a finite group, the cardinalities satisfy
The last equality follows from Lagrange's theorem applied to the stabilizer subgroup.
Lagrange's theorem states that for a subgroup of a finite group ,
in particular, divides . Here is the subgroup index, the number of left cosets of .
The order of a group element is the least positive integer such that . It exists because is finite. The cyclic subgroup consists of exactly , so has order . Applying Lagrange's theorem to this subgroup gives
Choose a normal subgroup of prime order as in ii, and choose a subgroup of the other prime order . Their intersection is trivial by Lagrange's theorem. Both are cyclic groups, and ii gives .
The image of a group homomorphism from iii has order dividing , because its kernel of a group homomorphism partitions into equally sized cosets. Its order also divides by Lagrange's theorem. But
so is trivial in either case. By iii, has order and therefore equals .
If and generate and , the element has order , since its th power is the identity exactly when both and divide . Thus this direct product of groups is cyclic, and
Let and be subgroups of orders five and seven, which exist by i. Their normalizers contain and , respectively. By Lagrange's theorem, has order or , and has order or . If either has order , its subgroup is normal by iv.
Suppose neither is normal. Then iv gives at least seven distinct subgroups of order five and at least five distinct subgroups of order seven. Distinct subgroups of the same prime order intersect only in the identity, and a subgroup of order five and one of order seven also intersect only in the identity by Lagrange's theorem. Thus would have at least
nonidentity elements, contradicting . Hence at least one of is a normal subgroup.
By Lagrange's theorem, every nonidentity group element has order , , or . If some element has order , its seventh and fifth powers have orders and , respectively, and we are done.
Otherwise every nonidentity element has order or . Distinct subgroups of a given prime number order intersect only in the identity: a shared nonidentity element generates both. If there were no element of order , the nonidentity elements would therefore partition into sets of six, the nonidentity elements of the cyclic subgroups of order seven. This would force , a contradiction. If there were no element of order , the analogous partition into sets of four would force , again a contradiction. Thus elements of both orders exist.
Let the finite set contain distinct left cosets. By i, they form a disjoint partition of a set , and by ii each has elements. If is also finite, counting this finite disjoint set union gives
Thus is a finite group. This is the counting argument behind Lagrange's theorem.
The multiplicative group of a finite field has group order : its elements are exactly the nonzero residue classes. For any prime factor of , i and Lagrange's theorem therefore imply
Since and are positive integers, , and hence
This applies to every prime factor, including repeated prime factors viewed as the same prime number.
A smallest example is the Klein four-group
with coordinatewise addition modulo . Every nonidentity element has order of a group element , so none generates all four elements; hence this group is not a cyclic group.
A group of group order is a cyclic group. A group of group order or is also a cyclic group: choose a nonidentity element; by Lagrange's theorem, its order of a group element is a nontrivial divisor of that prime number, so equals the whole group order. Thus no smaller example exists, and the smallest possible group order is .