Bell-state nondemolition measurement 2026-10-07
The Bell states are joint eigenstates of commuting and . Two shared Bell state meter pairs realize their two entanglement-assisted nondemolition parity measurements using spacelike local circuits. Their projector products give the four rank-one Bell state outcomes and preserve each input Bell state. The globally identified outcome requires later local operations and classical communication.
Share a Bell state meter pair, apply local system-to-meter CNOT gates, and measure each meter in the computational basis. The parity of the local meter records measures system while preserving all coherence within either parity sector. The complete tuple of local records has Kraus operator . Each local record is uniform, and the nonlocal result requires local operations and classical communication to compare records. A local Hadamard gate conjugation supplies the corresponding measurement.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2013 iii Paper 57 3 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Write the system's basis as , and use a separate pair of meter qubits in the Bell state . Alice applies a CNOT gate from system to her meter qubit; Bob simultaneously applies a CNOT gate from to his meter qubit. Flipping neither or both meter qubits preserves , while flipping exactly one gives . Hence the entanglement-assisted nondemolition parity measurement interaction produceswhere and . Each party now measures only their meter qubit in the basis. If their binary records are , the system Kraus operator isUnequal records verify zero total spin, since vanishes precisely on the odd sector. The probability of success is , and the successful conditional state is . Every zero-total--spin state is left unchanged, including any coherent superposition of and . Similarly the even-sector coherence is preserved. This is a quantum nondemolition measurement of the parity, rather than separate measurements of both system spins.
All quantum operations and local meter measurements can finish within the spacelike time window. Nevertheless each local meter record is individually uniform: . The verification result is obtained only by comparing the records using local operations and classical communication. Thus “instantaneous” refers to the local completion of the joint measurement instrument, not instant access to its nonlocal outcome; quantum no-signalling remains intact.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2013 iii Paper 57 3 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Apply the modulo operation to the eigenvalues of . The product eigenstates have ordinary eigenvalues , respectively, and residues modulo . The resulting observable isUse the entanglement-assisted nondemolition parity measurement from part (a). Equal local meter records give ; unequal records give . Its conditional quantum measurement maps are and , with normalization by their probabilities. The quantum nondemolition measurement preserves every vector within each degenerate eigenspace, including superpositions of and . Measuring the two system spins separately would destroy that even-sector coherence and would therefore not realize the same Lüders rule instrument. The nonlocal eigenvalue again becomes known only after local operations and classical communication compares the local records.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2013 iii Paper 57 3 c ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
At the four eigenstates are the computational product basis, with irrelevant signs on two vectors. Alice and Bob measure their own system qubits in . These local projective measurements preserve each product eigenstate; their pair of records identifies the global outcome after local operations and classical communication.
At the four states are the Bell states. They are simultaneous eigenstates of the commuting Pauli operators and : have respective pairs . Their nonlocal parity measurements can be performed without directly distinguishing the local system spins.
Use the first shared Bell state pair to perform the entanglement-assisted nondemolition parity measurement of . Use the second shared pair for : both parties apply a local Hadamard gate to their system qubit, execute the same local system-to-meter CNOT gates and -meter measurements, then undo the Hadamard gates. This measures because . The two system parity projectors commute, since anticommutation at both sites cancels:Each is the corresponding rank-one Bell state projector. Every complete tuple of four local meter records has system Kraus operator for its two parities. Summing the four record tuples compatible with gives the ideal outcome map . The protocol is a Bell-state nondemolition measurement: an input Bell state is preserved, while an arbitrary input is projected onto the reported Bell state with the Born rule probability.
The local circuits need no adaptive communication between the laboratories, so both parties can finish inside the specified time window. Global identification of still requires later local operations and classical communication. This endpoint protocol respects quantum no-signalling, unlike the hypothetical intermediate-angle instrument in part (i).
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 ii Paper 1 10D b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
Alice performs a projective Bell-basis measurement on her qubits and . Outcome occurs with probability and leaves Bob's qubit inAlice sends the two classical bits to Bob. He applies the inverse Pauli operationrecovering exactly, up to an irrelevant global phase. This is quantum teleportation: only local operations and classical communication are used, while the shared Bell pair supplies the entanglement resource.
The nonselective channel of a hypothetical spacelike nonlocal quantum measurement must not allow a distant input change to alter local output statistics. For a rank-one measurement in the rotated even and odd two-qubit bases with angle , Alice's output satisfiesBob can change the last correlation using only his local Pauli Z gate while Alice keeps the input . The resulting signal excludes . Degenerate observables that do not distinguish this basis are not covered by the rank-one argument. Locally recording a jointly encoded result, which is decoded later by local operations and classical communication, is compatible with quantum no-signalling.