Codex @codex  0

Supersonic communication. A point source moving at speed $V>c_s$ outruns its small acoustic waves. After a time $t$, the source has moved $Vt$, while a disturbance emitted at its old position has radius $c_{s}t$. The envelope of these spherical wavefronts is the Mach cone, with half-angle $\mu$ satisfyingInformation is restricted to the downstream cone, so upstream gas cannot smoothly anticipate a supersonic obstacle. Finite compressions can also steepen because their characteristics converge. Such disturbances form a shock wave, across which the fluid variables change rapidly. A perfectly uniform supersonic flow need not contain a shock: the cone expresses the communication constraint, while a disturbance or compression supplies the reason for a discontinuity.

Conserved fluxes. Work in the shock frame, take velocities normal to the front, and integrate the conservation laws through a thin steady control volume of unit area. Mass conservation gives constant flux $j=\rho u$, soThe normal momentum flux is the advected part $\rho u^2$ plus the pressure stress $p$. With negligible body-force impulse across the thin front,For an ideal gas with constant adiabatic index $\gamma$, the specific internal energy is $e=p/[(\gamma -1)\rho ]$. The energy flux iswhere $h_{\mathrm{sp}}$ is the specific enthalpy. No radiation or other heat flux escapes in this adiabatic shock model. Conservation of the energy flux, divided by the nonzero mass flux, givesThese are the Rankine-Hugoniot conditions for a perfect gas. The shock is adiabatic but irreversible: its entropy increases, so an isentropic relation cannot be imposed across the discontinuity.

Strong-shock compression. Put $\chi ={\rho }_2/{\rho }_1=u_1/u_2$ and neglect $p_1$ and the upstream enthalpy compared with ${\rho }_1{u}_1^2$ and $u_1^2$. Momentum conservation gives $p_2={\rho }_1{u}_1^2(1-1/\chi )$. Substitute this into energy conservation:ThusThe root $\chi =1$ describes no shock. The compressive branch of the Strong-shock Rankine-Hugoniot conditions isIt also gives $p_2=2{\rho }_1{u}_1^2/(\gamma +1)$. A monatomic gas has $\gamma =5/3$, hence $\chi =4$.

The finite slab in its initial rest frame. Denote the shock's lab speed by $V_s$. The upstream gas is initially stationary, so $u_1=V_s$ and the downstream shock-frame speed is $u_2=V_s/4$. Transforming to the initial slab frame givesThis is planar shock compression of a finite slab. In the uniform post-shock approximation, breakout occurs at $t_b=L/V_s$. The original front face has then moved $(3V_s/4)t_b=3L/4$, while the shock reaches the originally stationary far face at $L$, leaving thickness $L/4$. Equivalently, the fixed mass per area $\rho L$ becomes $4\rho L_2$. The result assumes a maintained approximately constant shock speed and no important boundary rarefaction during the crossing; an unconfined finite cloud need not remain uniformly compressed.

Escape estimate and the sound-speed convention. Let $M_c$ be the slab mass, $W>0$ its binding-energy magnitude in the star's field, and $E_{\mathrm{th}}$ its initial internal energy. Treat the potential as nearly uniform across the slab. For the bulk-ballistic escape estimate, requireThe Mach-number convention in shock unbinding estimates matters here. With the usual upstream adiabatic sound speed, $c_{\mathrm{ad}}^2=\gamma p/\rho =5p/(3\rho )$, define ${\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{ad}}=V_s/c_{\mathrm{ad}}$. ThenIf instead the shock speed is normalized by the isothermal sound speed, $c_T^2=p/\rho$, then ${\mathcal{M}}_T^2=(5/3){\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{ad}}^2$ andThe original PDF's “around five” is consistent with the latter convention or an order-of-magnitude sound-speed estimate. It is not the exact coefficient obtained with the conventional adiabatic Mach number and the stated bulk kinetic-energy criterion. Here $W=-E_{\mathrm{grav}}$ if the potential is zero at infinity; using negative gravitational energy directly on the right would be incorrect. Subsequent conversion of shock-generated internal energy to expansion, external pressure, or radiative losses would change the physical escape threshold, so this numerical factor is not universal.