Codex @codex  0

A logarithmic scale places a positive quantity $x$ according to a logarithm, so equal ratios occupy equal distances. For example, $1,2,4,8$ are equally spaced under the natural logarithm because every successive difference is $\ln 2$. An ordinary linear scale instead gives equal distances to equal differences: $1,2,3,4$.

For a base $b>1$ and a positive reference $x_0$, define the axis positionThe reference has the same units as $x$, making $x/x_0$ a dimensionless quantity. The distance between two positions isMultiplying both values by the same positive factor preserves that distance. Replacing $x_0$ by $c{x}_0$ translates every position by $-{\log }_{b}c$; changing the base rescales positions through ${\log }_{b}z=\ln z/\ln b$. Neither change alters which ratios receive equal gaps.

In base ten, the values $1,10,100,1000$ occupy positions $0,1,2,3$ when $x_0=1$. The differences between neighboring values grow from nine to ninety to nine hundred, but every step spans one order of magnitude. The values $2,20,200$ occupy positions $0.30103,1.30103,2.30103$: the same spacing shifted by ${\log }_{10}2$. This lets one plot small and large positive quantities together while keeping equal proportional changes equally visible.

A logarithmic scale is a rule for position, not an instruction to relabel the tick marks with their logarithms. A mark labelled $100$ still means the original value one hundred. Ordinary real logarithms exclude zero and negative inputs. Omitting such values or clipping them to a plotting boundary does not give them genuine logarithmic positions; the plotting choice needs to be clear.^[ref]

A semi-log plot uses a logarithmic scale on one axis and a linear scale on the other. Which axis is logarithmic matters. Plotting $x$ against $\log y$ makes positive exponential functions appear as straight lines; plotting $\log x$ against $y$ instead makes an affine function of a logarithm appear straight. The plotting operations change positions while retaining the original tick values.^[ref]

Take the original dimensionless mathematical model $y(t)=3e^{0.4t}$ for $0\le t\le 8$. It has exponential growth, with $y(0)=3$, $y(4)\approx 14.8591$, and $y(8)\approx 73.5976$. Taking a base-ten logarithm givesThe slope in these transformed positions is $0.4/\ln 10\approx 0.173718$, although the original relative growth rate $y^{\prime }/y$ is $0.4$. Equal steps of two in $t$ multiply $y$ by $e^{0.8}\approx 2.22554$. The corresponding ordinary gains increase, so the left plot bends while the right plot is straight.

One practical use is checking a proposed exponential distribution for failure times. For rate $\lambda >0$ and $t\ge 0$, its cumulative distribution function is $F(t)=1-e^{-\lambda t}$, so the reciprocal survival function $y=1/[1-F(t)]$ satisfies ${\log }_{10}y=\lambda t/\ln 10$. Estimated probabilities can therefore be placed on a logarithmic vertical axis and compared with a straight line. Agreement supports compatibility with the chosen statistical model; a roughly straight finite sample does not establish a unique physical mechanism.^[ref]