Discovery of 51 Pegasi b 2026-10-18
Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz began observing 51 Pegasi in September 1994 and revisited its repeating Doppler spectroscopy signal in 1995. Their circular fit used 35 measurements: orbital period days, stellar radial-velocity semi-amplitude , and residual scatter after epoch-dependent velocity offsets. Apparently stable comparison stars checked the instrumental zero point. Low chromospheric stellar activity and an inferred roughly 30-day stellar rotation period argued against starspots; light curves and the spectral line bisector tested stellar pulsation. These checks favoured orbital motion but had finite sensitivity. The reported Jupiter masses was not a true mass. Stronger upper bounds used stellar-spin information and assumed spin–orbit alignment, limiting a nearly face-on binary star interpretation conditionally.[ref]
The hot Jupiter matters both for planetary migration and for how exoplanets are found. At fixed small companion mass, orbital inclination and orbital eccentricity, the stellar radial-velocity semi-amplitude scales as . Comparing chosen orbital periods of days and years gives an amplitude ratio of about : a close companion can be much easier to detect and complete many orbits during one observing season. Finding a giant planet close to its star also asks how its present orbit relates to where it formed. Doppler spectroscopy supplies a dynamical constraint; it does not by itself establish a formation pathway or measure the exoplanet's radius.
ELODIE spectrograph 2026-10-18
Built by André Baranne, Michel Mayor, Didier Queloz and colleagues, the ELODIE fiber-fed spectrograph carried light from Haute-Provence's 1.93-metre telescope through optical fibers. Its echelle grating dispersed light in high diffraction orders; an optical prism and grism cross-disperser separated them perpendicularly on a charge-coupled device. This cross-dispersed echelle spectrograph achieved spectral resolving power . A simultaneous thorium reference tracked instrumental drift. Wavelength calibration mapped detector positions to wavelengths; spectral cross-correlation combined many spectral lines into a fitted profile. A barycentric velocity correction removed the observer's motion.[ref]
Figure 1.
ELODIE measurement chain and synthetic radial-velocity readout
. Original schematic; the correlation profile and periodic signal are synthetic. Details.
Why can a spectrograph measure a Doppler shift much smaller than one spectral resolution element? Resolution concerns separating neighbouring features, whereas locating the centre of a known profile uses information across that profile and across many spectral lines. For a chosen example, at a recession velocity of gives
At , one spectral resolution element corresponds to , about times larger. A well measured centre can move by a small fraction of that width. More photons and more useful spectral lines improve the estimate, but do not remove wavelength calibration errors or stellar activity.
A simple mathematical picture of spectral cross-correlation makes the readout concrete. Define , with fixed reference wavelength , and let be continuum-normalized line absorption. For small velocities, a common Doppler shift approximately translates . A positive absorption mask then gives
If , the maximum occurs at ; a convention correlating the received observed radiative flux instead produces a dip. A fitted correlation centre is an effective collective line position, not a claim that each individual spectral line has been resolved into a narrower feature. The lamp tracks instrumental drift, while the barycentric velocity correction removes the observer's changing line-of-sight velocity; neither removes changes in the star itself.
One half went to James Peebles for theoretical discoveries in physical cosmology. One quarter each went to Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz for discovering an exoplanet orbiting a solar-type star.[ref]