Choose a hypothetical fluid with molar constants and , using . These stipulated constants are not a fit to carbon dioxide. The molar critical formulas give
At and , first convert to . The repulsive-volume term and attractive correction are
so . The ideal gas law would instead give . The excluded volume raises pressure relative to that ideal value, but attraction more than offsets the increase here. Neither correction alone describes this example.
Figure 1.
Molar Van der Waals equation: competing corrections and a calculated critical point
. Original calculations for the stipulated hypothetical fluid. Left: the ideal gas law, the excluded-volume term and their attraction-corrected result at . Right: molar Van der Waals isotherms; the dotted subcritical curve is a homogeneous continuation, while the green Maxwell construction plateau is equilibrium phase coexistence. None of the curves are measured carbon dioxide data. Details.
For , the same state occupies . The total-volume formula gives and the same . Halving the sample has halved both its physical volume and its excluded volume, while retaining its pressure. Conversely, if the two critical measurements are used to determine model constants, inversion gives
An independent critical molar volume then tests the prediction ; agreement with two fitted numbers does not ensure agreement with the third.
At , the Van der Waals liquid-gas coexistence example below becomes , , and . For a mean molar volume of , the lever rule gives gas mole fraction . Its volume fraction is instead : less than one quarter of the molecules occupy more than half the volume. The flat equilibrium pressure corresponds to changing these proportions. It does not describe a homogeneous sample sliding along the unstable loop.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.