For an invertible fundamental matrix, differentiating in and in gives and . Thus the necessary and sufficient compatibility identity is
Here both derivatives must use the actual deformation variable ; the printed has not been defined. The isomonodromic deformation identity can be checked as a polynomial in , without assuming the conclusion.
First retain the coefficients actually printed in the PDF. Write , , and introduce the two residuals
Direct matrix multiplication and differentiation give
For example, the quadratic lower entry is the difference between and the contribution ; it does not cancel. The constant lower entry follows by differentiating and collecting it as . These entries also provide independent checks of the two most important cancellations.
Work on an open connected deformation domain where , as the matrices require. The quadratic entry forces throughout the domain, hence by continuity, including a possible point . All remaining entries then vanish exactly when . Thus the literal answer is
This is a rescaled Airy function equation: with , the equation is , so on a domain avoiding its zeros. In particular, choose the local solution with and . It gives compatible matrices but violates the printed . This proves that the requested assertion is false for the original coefficients, independently of the undefined in the printed differential equation.
For completeness, use the explicitly corrected lower coefficient from the preceding solution. The same multiplication gives the much simpler residual
Consequently compatibility is equivalent to . The first equation integrates without dividing by :
The constant of integration therefore satisfies , and the second equation becomes
Conversely these two equations give , and substitution makes every residual entry vanish, proving sufficiency as well as necessity. This is the quadratic spectral Lax pair for zero-parameter Painlevé II. For , choose constants with and , set , , and obtain , the zero-parameter Painlevé II equation. For it reduces to the Airy function equation. Even with this correction, the conclusions are and the coefficient , rather than the incompatible expressions printed in the question.
The scaling of the equation suggests , , for . Substitution gives
Integrating in gives the scaled Painlevé II equation
where is an arbitrary integration constant. If the standard normalization is desired, set and . Then and
The direct scaled equation avoids introducing imaginary variables when a real is required.
Balancing the time derivative, cubic nonlinearity and third spatial derivative gives and . Choose and . Then
Thus the similarity solution is
The extra spherical term changes the coefficient of . This third-order equation cannot be integrated directly into the standard second-order Painlevé II equation of the ordinary modified KdV reduction.
Let have diagonal entries and off-diagonal entries and . Let have diagonal entries and off-diagonal entries . Substitution into the isomonodromic deformation compatibility identity gives the displayed equations on domains with . Thus , so and , a rescaled zero-parameter Painlevé II equation when . The leading coefficient is required by cancellation of the quadratic spectral terms.