The structure theorem for finitely generated modules over a principal ideal domain applies to a Euclidean domain because every Euclidean domain is a principal ideal domain. In invariant-factor form, every finitely generated module has a decompositionwhere , and each is a nonzero nonunit. The rank of a module is unique and the invariant factors of a finitely generated module are unique up to multiplication by units. The zero module is allowed by taking .
Every abelian group is a module over , and a finite abelian group is finitely generated. Since is a Euclidean domain, the theorem applies. A nonzero free module summand would be infinite, so a finite group has . Choosing positive integer representatives gives the finite abelian classificationThe ordered integers are uniquely determined. Splitting each into prime powers using the Chinese remainder theorem gives the equivalent elementary-divisor form as a direct sum of cyclic prime-power groups.
Use the Chinese remainder theorem to separate relatively prime factors:These five cyclic prime-power summands are the elementary-divisor form. Leave one summand aside and combine the factors of orders , which are pairwise coprime. Their direct sum of modules is cyclic of order . The invariant-factor canonical form is thereforeIts group order is , and its exponent of a finite group is , providing independent checks on the decomposition. Since its exponent is smaller than its order, itself is not cyclic.
We prove the unique-subgroup criterion for a finite abelian group to be cyclic using the invariant-factor classification from part (a). If is nontrivial, writewhere denotes a cyclic group of order . If , choose a prime number dividing ; then also divides . In the first cyclic factor, the element represented by has order of a group element , and the corresponding element in the second factor has order as well.
The two elements supported in their separate coordinates generate distinct subgroups of order : one has zero second coordinate, and the other has zero first coordinate. Both are subgroups of , and . This contradicts the assumed uniqueness for that divisor. Hence , andIf is the trivial group, it is already cyclic, generated by its identity. Thus the argument covers every finite order.
The multiplicative group of a field is abelian, so its finite subgroup is a finite abelian group. Let , and suppose is a subgroup of order . By Lagrange's theorem, the order of each divides , hence . Thus is contained in the set of roots in of .
This nonzero polynomial has degree , so it has at most roots. Since the distinct elements of are already roots, they comprise the whole root set. Any second subgroup of order would also consist of roots of the same polynomial, forcing . Therefore there is at most one subgroup of each order dividing .
Part (c) now applies to giveThe root bound remains valid in positive characteristic, even if the formal derivative of vanishes: the argument counts distinct roots, so no separability assumption is needed.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.