Write with . For each divisor the subgroup has order . Conversely, if has order , Lagrange gives , and every satisfies , so . Therefore and . Equality follows from the common order. Thus there is exactly one subgroup for each divisor of .
For the Abelian assertion, take a surjection and let be the inverse image of . Every subgroup of has at most generators, by induction: its projection onto the first coordinate is either zero, reducing to , or for some . In the latter case choose one element with first coordinate ; subtracting its multiples reduces every element to the kernel, generated by at most elements by induction. The base case is the elementary description of subgroups of by their least positive element. Images of these generators generate , proving the claim.
In , the commuting disjoint transpositions generate . This is a three-dimensional vector space over , so it requires three generators and cannot be generated by two.
For each , take , generated by and the cycle . Its subgroup generated byis . It requires generators by the same dimension argument, giving a two-generated group with a subgroup requiring more than generators.
A Sylow subgroup for the prime is a maximal -subgroup; in a finite group of order with it has order . Sylow theorems assert existence, containment of every -subgroup in a Sylow -subgroup, conjugacy of all Sylow -subgroups, and the counting conditions , .
Since is a normal subgroup, is a subgroup andThe final index is prime to . Since is a -subgroup, its index in being prime to means it contains the entire -part of . Hence is Sylow in .
If and are Sylow -subgroups, their product has the full -part of , hence is Sylow. Conversely, for any Sylow , its two projections are -subgroups and lie in some Sylows . Then , and equality follows by order. Distinct pairs give distinct subgroups because their projections recover and . Thus
Define and . A group is a soluble group if this derived series reaches the identity after finitely many steps. Its derived length is the least with .
Let . This Klein four-group is a normal subgroup and Abelian; has order three, so . The group is nonabelian, so its derived subgroup is nontrivial. Conjugation by a three-cycle permutes the three nonidentity elements of transitively. Since the derived subgroup is a normal subgroup, containing any one forces it to contain all three. Thus , and . Therefore has derived length two.
If , every commutator in is one in , and induction gives for all . Thus a subgroup of a solvable group is solvable, with no larger derived length.
The sign map gives . The commutator is a three-cycle. Normality of supplies every conjugate three-cycle, and three-cycles generate . Hence , so the complete derived series isEvery inclusion is strict, proving solvability and derived length three.
For the preliminary index assertion, the coset action gives a homomorphism . Its kernel is a normal subgroup and cannot be all of , because the action is transitive on points. Simplicity makes the kernel trivial. The sign homomorphism of this faithful action must be trivial: otherwise simplicity would identify with , impossible for a transitive action of degree at least three. Thus embeds in , and Lagrange givesA group of order has a Sylow two-subgroup of index seven. If the group were simple, the preceding result would give . This fails because is divisible by while has only three factors of two. Thus there is no simple group of order .
For order , Sylow gives . If it is one, the order-seven Sylow is a normal subgroup. Otherwise its eight Sylows of order seven intersect only at the identity, giving nonidentity elements of order seven. Only eight elements remain including the identity. Every Sylow two-subgroup has order eight and consists entirely of these remaining elements. Hence all Sylow two-subgroups coincide and the order-eight subgroup is a normal subgroup. Either case gives a nontrivial proper normal subgroup, so no group of order is simple.
For order , Sylow's congruence and divisibility conditions giveIf neither Sylow subgroup were a normal subgroup, there would be elements of order five and elements of order seven. Distinct subgroups of either prime order intersect only at the identity, and elements of the two orders are disjoint. This would give at least elements in a group of order , a contradiction. Thus a subgroup of order five or seven is a normal subgroup, and the group is not simple.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.