An affine variety in is the common zero set of a collection of polynomials in , with its Zariski topology. We use the convention of this question that such a variety need not be irreducible. Its vanishing ideal and coordinate ring are
The quotient identifies polynomials that give the same function on , so its elements are exactly polynomial functions on .
For affine embeddings and , a morphism of affine varieties is a map with and image in . Pullback of polynomial functions defines the contravariant homomorphism
It is well defined because any polynomial vanishing on pulls back to zero on , and it preserves addition, multiplication, one, and the constants in .
The radical of an ideal is
The ideal is radical if . Its zero set is , an affine variety by definition.
Every vanishes at every point of , so . If , then in the field for every , so for each such point. Hence and
Part (b) immediately gives . For the reverse inclusion, let . The case is immediate, so assume . Noetherianity gives finite generators .
Use the Rabinowitsch trick: in the polynomial ring with one auxiliary variable, form
Apply the assumed maximal-ideal description to polynomial rings, including this ring in variables. If were proper, it would lie in the maximal ideal of some point . Then and , impossible because vanishes on . Therefore is the whole ring, and there is an identity
Substitute in the localization . The last term vanishes; clearing the finitely many powers of from the remaining denominators yields for some . Thus and
This proves the strong Hilbert Nullstellensatz from the polynomial-ring weak form by converting nonvanishing into an extra equation.
Here subvariety means a closed affine subvariety. Suppose first that is onto, and write , . Put and . Choose with and let have components .
If , then , so . It vanishes on , proving . The chosen lifts give , and by the definition of .
Let the components of be polynomial functions on . For each target coordinate , the element has zero pullback, hence belongs to . It vanishes on , giving . Both maps have polynomial components, so is an isomorphism onto the closed subvariety .
Conversely, if is an isomorphism onto a closed subvariety, restriction is surjective, and the pullback of that isomorphism is an isomorphism. Their composition is , proving
The word closed matters: an isomorphism onto a merely locally closed subset need not induce a surjective coordinate-ring map. For example induces .
The parametrization lands on the curve because . Its pullback has image
Every monomial in this subalgebra has exponent for nonnegative integers . No such exponent is one, so no linear combination of these monomials is . Thus is not surjective and is not an isomorphism.
It is nevertheless bijective on points. Away from the origin, and gives and using ; the origin comes only from . The rational inverse cannot extend regularly at the origin: if with , then has a nonzero degree-one term, whereas has none.
This distinguishes a set-theoretic bijection from an isomorphism of varieties in every characteristic.
Figure 1.
Cusp parametrizations reveal which rational coordinates fail to be regular
. The left curve uses x=t cubed and y=t to the fourth; recovering t fails regularly at its origin. The right curve uses x=t cubed and y=t squared; the open subset used later omits the parameter values zero and one, marked with hollow circles. Details.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.