Past exam of the astrophysical fluid dynamics course of the University of Cambridge / 2021 / Section B / 5 / e / Solution

Using the supplied first critical value ${\xi }_c\simeq 6.5$, the critical radius of a pressure-confined isothermal sphere isNo radius in metres can be specified without $K$ and a central mass density. Here $c_s$ is the isothermal sound speed, consistent with the fixed-temperature variations in part (d). At a given central mass density, equilibria truncated at $\xi <{\xi }_c$ lie on the first stable branch, while increasing the dimensionless outer radius beyond this first threshold gives an unstable configuration. Numerical integration gives ${\xi }_c\simeq 6.451$, consistent with the paper's rounded $6.5$.

For a transparent comparison with the given Jeans length, set the uniform comparison density ${\rho }_0={\rho }_c$ and use the same speed of sound. ThenBoth scales express the competition between pressure support and self-gravity, with characteristic length $c_s/\sqrt{G\rho }$. Their numerical closeness under this density choice does not mean that the models impose the same threshold: $r_c$ is a boundary radius, whereas ${\lambda }_J$ is the wavelength of a perturbation. Comparing $r_c$ with ${\lambda }_J/2$ would instead give a factor about $2.07$. Using the sphere's mean or boundary density instead of its central density changes the coefficient again, so the reference density must always be stated.

The pressure-confined isothermal sphere gives an actual finite, centrally concentrated hydrostatic equilibrium and an explicit confining pressure, making its radial stability threshold more self-consistent for a roughly spherical isothermal cloud. The uniform Jeans instability model gives a simpler local criterion, includes perturbations at different wavelengths, and does not require constructing a spherical equilibrium. Its ideal uniform static infinite background requires the Jeans swindle or an explicitly specified treatment of background gravity. Neither model includes rotation, magnetic fields, turbulent support or a realistic temperature evolution, so neither is a universal collapse criterion.