Past exam of the biological physics course of the University of Oxford / 2022 / 3 / b / Solution

The rising sigmoid shows activation by depolarization: $P_o$ is almost zero at very negative membrane potential, rises steeply around $-20\mathrm{mV}$, and approaches about $0.8$ at positive membrane potential. The graph describes the fraction of time a single ion channel is open, not a continuously variable opening amplitude. A convenient phenomenological fit isHere $V_{1/2}$ refers to half the maximum, about $0.4$, not absolute $P_o=0.5$. The effective gating charge describes the steepness; a sigmoid alone does not identify the microscopic gating sequence or explain why the observed maximum is below one.

A voltage-gated potassium channel has four pore-forming subunits. Each canonical subunit contains an S1–S4 voltage-sensing domain and S5–S6 pore elements. Positive charges in S4 respond to the electric field; their displacement during depolarization changes the energetic preference of sensor conformations. Coupling through the sensor–pore interface favors opening of the intracellular pore gate. The potassium selectivity filter is structurally distinct from this voltage sensor.

Several independent observations support this account. Voltage clamp detects transient gating electric currents before pore conduction, even when ionic conduction is blocked: charge movement precedes opening. Charge-neutralization studies change total gating charge and voltage dependence, with contributions from charged S4 residues and an S2 residue. Accessibility and voltage-sensitive optical measurements support conformational motion rather than permeating potassium itself acting as the sensor. Structural measurements locate the charged sensor beside the pore. These observations constrain a coupled moving-sensor mechanism, while the exact displacement cannot be deduced from this $P_o$ curve alone.^[ref][ref]