Past exam of the condensed matter physics course of the University of Oxford / 2022 / 2 / a

The boundary of the first Brillouin zone is $|k|=\pi /a$. The unperturbed free electron model assigns the kinetic energywhere $m_e$ is the bare electron mass and $\hslash$ is the reduced Planck constant. This is the free kinetic energy at the Brillouin zone boundary, not the already split energy band edge. A constant mean potential energy may be absorbed into the choice of zero of energy.

Write $U(x)=-e\varphi (x)$ for the potential energy of an electron in an electrostatic potential $\varphi$, where $e>0$. With $G=2\pi /a$, the coupling in the nearly-free electron model is the Fourier coefficientIf a symbol $V(x)$ already denotes the electron potential energy, as in part (c), it replaces $U(x)$ without another factor $-e$.

At the Brillouin zone boundary the two resonant plane waves have unperturbed energy $E_{\mathrm{ZB}}$. Their Hamiltonian operator in the two-state basis has diagonal entries $E_{\mathrm{ZB}}$ and off-diagonal entries $V_G,V_G^{\ast }$; its eigenvalues are $E_{\mathrm{ZB}}\pm |V_G|$. ThusThis is the local band gap in the two-wave nearly-free electron model.

For zero coupling, $\sqrt{4y^2}=2|y|$, and the two folded energy bands areThey touch at $y=0$, where the underlying free plane wave branches cross. A nonzero Fourier coefficient replaces this crossing by an avoided crossing, with $E_{\pm }(0)=E_{\mathrm{ZB}}(1\pm ϵ)$. The lower energy band moves downward and the upper energy band upward. Both branches are smooth near $y=0$ for $ϵ>0$.

The figure uses the boundary-centred interval $-1\le y\le 1$ required in part (b). With the printed definition $y=1-ka/\pi$, this is the translated Brillouin zone $0\le k\le 2\pi /a$. The printed $0\le y\le 2$ instead corresponds to $-\pi /a\le k\le \pi /a$; the local two-wave formula must be folded appropriately before treating it as a dispersion over that entire zone. It must not be integrated over $0\le y\le 2$ as though it were the filled first energy band there. The subsequent calculation follows the explicit continuation prescribed in part (b).