Write evaluated at the fixed pair . Differentiating in gives , , and , proving .
Differentiate the other parameter. The difference of the required sides is
The first bracket is zero by the prescribed initial compatibility condition, and the second is zero by differentiating . Thus as well. These calculations use the differentiability of the supplied parametric functions.
If the coordinate Jacobian determinant is nonzero, the inverse function theorem gives local coordinates . The chain rule then makes solve a homogeneous two-by-two linear system with determinant . Therefore
This is the method of characteristics for a first-order equation depending only on the gradient.
Take . Parametrize the initial line by , , . Initial compatibility gives , and then gives . The characteristic formula in part (a) yields
Since , take . To select the branch connected smoothly to the initial data, stop each characteristic before its coordinate map folds. Its Jacobian determinant is
so this branch has . Eliminating gives
For fixed , the right side defining is strictly increasing on that selected branch. At its lower endpoint it equals , and it tends to infinity as . Thus it gives exactly one for every point in
Substituting that unique into the formula for gives the required classical solution. As at fixed , , and as required.
Without the pre-fold branch restriction, the algebraic equation also has a smaller positive root. That root tends to zero as , and its tends to zero rather than , so it does not solve the prescribed initial-boundary problem. The fold is the characteristic caustic; uniqueness here is for the classical branch continued from the given initial data before that fold.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.