Use metric signature , , and retain terms linear in or . The inverse metric is and . In the Christoffel symbol formula
the differentiated metric perturbation is already first order, so the prefactor can be replaced by the flat inverse metric. For example and . Evaluating the remaining components gives
The lower-index symmetry follows from the torsion-free connection. Products of these first-order Christoffel symbols are beyond the retained weak-field approximation.
A pressureless relativistic fluid has stress-energy tensor , with four-velocity normalized by . In its rest frame, , so . Here is rest-frame mass density, or energy density divided by .
For the linearized Ricci tensor and scalar, discard the quadratic connection terms. The contracted connection is . Differentiation then gives
The Ricci scalar uses the zeroth-order inverse metric, , because multiplying first-order curvature by another metric perturbation would again be second order. These are the linearized curvature of a two-potential weak-field metric in the paper's Riemann curvature tensor sign convention.
The Einstein tensor is . Thus , where the time raising introduces the minus sign. Substitution cancels the and time-derivative terms in that component and gives
The right sides follow from the Einstein field equations with zero cosmological constant. The full equations also contain the momentum constraint for dust at rest to this order. Specifying arbitrary time-dependent potentials without that constraint would not give a solution of all the Einstein field equations.
For a massive particle parametrized by proper time, the geodesic equation is
The weak-field approximation alone does not imply Newtonian motion. Also take a nonrelativistic limit, , in the usual quasistatic regime so the potentials' time variation does not compensate for the small velocity factors. Reparametrizing by coordinate time and retaining the leading velocity-independent spatial term gives
In empty space the first field equation gives . For static potentials, the spatial equations imply and then . The difference is at most affine; isolated-system boundary conditions fixing both potentials to zero at infinity remove it. Thus and
the empty-space Newton-Poisson equation. With the same quasistatic assumptions and dust present it becomes . Keeping rapid time dependence instead leaves in vacuum, so the static qualification matters.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.