We prove Lie's theorem in the required form by induction on . If , any nonzero vector works. Otherwise solvability gives , so choose a codimension-one ideal and . By induction there are and a linear functional with for all .
Let . Choose the cyclic basis up to its first linear dependence. The commutator identity , with , proves inductively that
Hence is invariant under and , and every has trace on . In particular implies . Characteristic zero gives .
The simultaneous weight space is nonzero and stable under , because
Over , the restriction of to this nonzero finite-dimensional space has an eigenvector. That vector is an eigenvector of both and every , hence of every element of .
Let be the quotient map. A full flag of ideals in lifts by inverse images to a flag from to , with dimensions increasing by one. Prepending supplies the required full flag in . Thus supersolubility lifts across a one-dimensional ideal.
Over , a nonzero soluble has a one-dimensional ideal: apply part (a) to its adjoint image acting on . A common eigenvector spans an adjoint-invariant line, which is an ideal. The quotient is soluble and has smaller dimension, so induction and the lifting result give a full flag of ideals. Therefore a soluble complex Lie algebra is supersoluble.
Conversely this implication needs no field restriction. If has a full flag, its first nonzero ideal is one-dimensional and abelian, and has a full flag. By induction is soluble, so some term of the derived series of lies in ; its next derived term is zero. Hence
Let be the two-dimensional affine Lie algebra with basis and bracket , and put
Both factors have zero centre, so . The line in the second factor is an ideal, making PSS. But its quotient onto the nonabelian simple algebra is not soluble. A quotient of a soluble algebra would be soluble, so is not soluble.
If is abelian and nonzero, . Otherwise choose such that is an ideal. For each write
The coefficient is uniquely defined and linear. The Jacobi identity gives
so . If , then .
If , the same equation says for all . Hence . Since is not central, its centralizer is proper. Thus in both cases
No algebraic closure or characteristic restriction was used.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.