Assume independent samples , , and wherever can contribute. The importance weight is , and the ordinary importance sampling estimator is
Its expectation is , by cancellation of in the expectation integral. The strong law of large numbers gives almost-sure convergence to . Common probability support is sufficient; the precise support condition for importance sampling only requires covering the nonzero integrand for this particular expectation.
Write and . If the constants needed to evaluate are unavailable, use the self-normalized importance sampling estimator
The unknown common factor cancels. Under full target probability support and integrability, the numerator and denominator sample means converge to and , respectively, whose ratio is . The same construction applies if only one normalization is unknown by taking the other probability density function already normalized. Sampling from itself is assumed available, even when its normalization is not explicitly known.
This ratio estimator is generally biased at finite , unlike the ordinary normalized-weight estimator. Also, its variance is not the formula in the next part: that formula concerns the ordinary unbiased estimator. Full probability support for is needed here because the denominator estimates the entire target normalizing integral, not just the probability support of .
Let . The independent summands have expectation and second moment
When this integral is finite, independence gives
If the second-moment integral diverges, the estimator can still be unbiased and consistent, but its variance is infinite; the finite-variance assumption cannot be omitted.
Put , with . The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality applied to and gives
Equality holds exactly when is proportional to on the contributing probability support. Therefore the minimum-variance importance distribution is
If has one sign, and the ideal proposal gives zero variance. Its normalization or exact sampling may nevertheless be impractical. If , the integrand vanishes almost everywhere and the estimator is identically zero.
The minimizing probability density function may vanish where even though there. This is valid for the ordinary estimator, which needs probability support only for its integrand. If one insists on exactly the same positive probability support as , the bound is instead an infimum whenever this vanishing occurs, approached by as : because , the second moment lies between and , proving convergence to the bound.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.