Let and write the interpolating spline as . The interpolation equations are , so . Since is defined as a unique interpolant for arbitrary data, its B-spline collocation matrix is invertible. Ordered sites satisfying diagonal positivity ensure this by question 7. Positivity alone without admissible ordering does not: two equal sites in overlapping basis supports could give two identical rows. The norm argument below uses the existence of the operator stipulated here.
Standard partition-normalized B-splines satisfy and . The latter is a subpartition of unity for B-splines: extending the knot sequence gives a full partition of unity, and discarding basis functions cannot increase its sum. Hence
Taking the supremum over and then over unit-norm gives the B-spline interpolation operator norm estimate
Here the matrix norm is the induced maximum-row-sum norm, not the maximum of its individual entries. The proof only needs nonnegative basis functions, their sum at most one, and invertible interpolation.
Use the Cox-de Boor recurrence. For unit knots the order-two hat is on , on , and zero elsewhere. The order-three quadratic cardinal B-spline is
Thus . At , the only possible arguments in its support are and at neighboring indices. Their values give
Indices outside are absent, so the first and last rows have just one neighboring nonzero value.
The centered quadratic spline interpolation matrix is the symmetric tridiagonal Toeplitz matrix
For , this means simply . To evaluate the inverse norm exactly, let and . If is the nonnegative adjacency matrix of the path, then and . The convergent Neumann series
therefore has nonnegative entries. Since , its entrywise absolute values are . Let . Then , or
The homogeneous characteristic roots are . Put . The particular solution and the two boundary conditions give
These row sums are symmetric and increase toward the centre: the exponential sum in the numerator is minimized at the middle integer or pair of integers. With , the exact finite-size inverse norm is thus
For example it equals at and at , tending to as . Stating only the bound two would not evaluate the finite matrix norm requested here.
The general estimate from part 1 and the exact inverse norm from part 2b imply
and in particular , uniformly in the number of knots. This bound concerns the support-centred sites ; shifting the sampling sites changes the B-spline collocation matrix and can destroy uniform stability.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.