Let and write the interpolating spline as . The interpolation equations are , so . Since is defined as a unique interpolant for arbitrary data, its B-spline collocation matrix is invertible. Ordered sites satisfying diagonal positivity ensure this by question 7. Positivity alone without admissible ordering does not: two equal sites in overlapping basis supports could give two identical rows. The norm argument below uses the existence of the operator stipulated here.
Standard partition-normalized B-splines satisfy and . The latter is a subpartition of unity for B-splines: extending the knot sequence gives a full partition of unity, and discarding basis functions cannot increase its sum. HenceTaking the supremum over and then over unit-norm gives the B-spline interpolation operator norm estimateHere the matrix norm is the induced maximum-row-sum norm, not the maximum of its individual entries. The proof only needs nonnegative basis functions, their sum at most one, and invertible interpolation.
Use the Cox-de Boor recurrence. For unit knots the order-two hat is on , on , and zero elsewhere. The order-three quadratic cardinal B-spline isThus . At , the only possible arguments in its support are and at neighboring indices. Their values giveIndices outside are absent, so the first and last rows have just one neighboring nonzero value.
The centered quadratic spline interpolation matrix is the symmetric tridiagonal Toeplitz matrixFor , this means simply . To evaluate the inverse norm exactly, let and . If is the nonnegative adjacency matrix of the path, then and . The convergent Neumann seriestherefore has nonnegative entries. Since , its entrywise absolute values are . Let . Then , orThe homogeneous characteristic roots are . Put . The particular solution and the two boundary conditions giveThese row sums are symmetric and increase toward the centre: the exponential sum in the numerator is minimized at the middle integer or pair of integers. With , the exact finite-size inverse norm is thusFor example it equals at and at , tending to as . Stating only the bound two would not evaluate the finite matrix norm requested here.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.