Write . For a radial function , the Laplacian is
Thus is a harmonic function off zero. Fix and stop Brownian motion when it reaches either sphere of radius or , at time . This exit time is finite: stopping the martingale at yields , and monotone convergence applies. By Itô's formula, is a bounded martingale. Optional stopping and dominated convergence therefore give
The events increase to as : a continuous path up to any finite hitting time is bounded. Since , , proving the Brownian hitting probability of a ball
To keep the normalization visible, denote the integral defining the printed constant by . Substituting gives, for ,
This is the Newtonian potential of the Brownian heat kernel. The singularity at zero is locally integrable in dimension , since its radial integral behaves like . All integrands are nonnegative, so Tonelli's theorem permits both orders of integration.
Integrating in first gives
Integrating in first uses the Gaussian heat kernel convolution. Completing the square in gives
Consequently , and the actual identity is
The original PDF uses rather than as the multiplier while defining its constant to equal . That formula is false. For example , so the required multiplier in dimension three is . Equivalently, as at , the left side tends to , whereas the printed right side tends to . One can retain the printed form only by defining its multiplier as .
Continue with equal to the integral defined in the PDF and . Until the Brownian motion hits the radius- ball, is a bounded local martingale, hence a true martingale. At the finite stopping time , optional stopping gives
Rearranging,
The fixed random variable is integrable by the Gaussian heat kernel and the local-integrability calculation above. Also . For any , the final expectation is at most
First send , then , proving that it vanishes. The identities from part (b) give
Subtracting yields the small-ball Brownian hitting asymptotic
Thus the constant in this printed limit requires exactly the same reciprocal correction as in part (b). For the multiplier is , not . The argument proves the corrected finite-time limit directly, rather than inferring it from the eventual hitting probability alone.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.