Write . For a radial function , the Laplacian isThus is a harmonic function off zero. Fix and stop Brownian motion when it reaches either sphere of radius or , at time . This exit time is finite: stopping the martingale at yields , and monotone convergence applies. By Itô's formula, is a bounded martingale. Optional stopping and dominated convergence therefore giveThe events increase to as : a continuous path up to any finite hitting time is bounded. Since , , proving the Brownian hitting probability of a ball
To keep the normalization visible, denote the integral defining the printed constant by . Substituting gives, for ,This is the Newtonian potential of the Brownian heat kernel. The singularity at zero is locally integrable in dimension , since its radial integral behaves like . All integrands are nonnegative, so Tonelli's theorem permits both orders of integration.
Integrating in first givesIntegrating in first uses the Gaussian heat kernel convolution. Completing the square in givesConsequently , and the actual identity isThe original PDF uses rather than as the multiplier while defining its constant to equal . That formula is false. For example , so the required multiplier in dimension three is . Equivalently, as at , the left side tends to , whereas the printed right side tends to . One can retain the printed form only by defining its multiplier as .
Continue with equal to the integral defined in the PDF and . Until the Brownian motion hits the radius- ball, is a bounded local martingale, hence a true martingale. At the finite stopping time , optional stopping givesRearranging,The fixed random variable is integrable by the Gaussian heat kernel and the local-integrability calculation above. Also . For any , the final expectation is at mostFirst send , then , proving that it vanishes. The identities from part (b) giveSubtracting yields the small-ball Brownian hitting asymptoticThus the constant in this printed limit requires exactly the same reciprocal correction as in part (b). For the multiplier is , not . The argument proves the corrected finite-time limit directly, rather than inferring it from the eventual hitting probability alone.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.