Under the intended assumption that one use of the quantum channel transmits one qubit without noise, Alice can communicate two classical bits with certainty if she and Bob already share a Bell pair. She uses superdense coding. The prior distribution of the Bell pair must be a resource available before the permitted channel use; distributing it through that same channel would consume another use.
Take the shared Bell state to be , with Alice holding the first qubit. For a two-bit message , Alice applies the local unitary operation to her qubit. The four encoded pure states are, up to irrelevant global phases,
They are orthogonal: for any matrix on the first qubit, , and the four Pauli operators are orthogonal in the trace inner product. Explicitly,
Alice sends her qubit through the quantum channel once. Bob now holds both qubits and performs a Bell-basis measurement. Its four orthogonal projectors identify with certainty, giving
Before the transmission, Bob's reduced density matrix is for every message, so shared entanglement alone does not convey the message.
Without shared entanglement, a noiseless single-qubit transmission cannot perfectly distinguish four messages: perfect discrimination requires orthogonal state supports, and its two-dimensional Hilbert space has room for at most two nonzero mutually orthogonal supports. The Holevo bound also limits its accessible classical information to one bit. For the usual protocol starting with a shared two-qubit pure state and using local unitary encodings, exact two-bit transmission requires a maximally mixed Bob marginal. Indeed all encoded joint states are pure and have the same , while Subadditivity of Von Neumann entropy gives their average entropy at most . Four equally likely perfectly distinguishable messages have average Von Neumann entropy two, forcing and hence a maximally entangled state.
The specification “quantum channel” alone does not determine its dimension or noise, so the one-qubit, noiseless interpretation is needed for this particular conclusion. A noiseless four-dimensional channel could send four orthogonal states without any shared entanglement; a completely depolarizing qubit channel cannot transmit the message even with a shared Bell pair, since its output is independent of Alice's encoding. Shared entanglement is therefore the extra resource for the intended single-qubit channel, not a guarantee for every unspecified quantum channel.
Let , and write for any odd-weight word . The parity functional on the four-dimensional binary linear code is nonzero, so its kernel has dimension three and its other fibre is the coset . For example belongs to the standard length-seven Hamming code and has odd Hamming weight. Denote the two logical basis states by and , corresponding to these two cosets. The eight computational orthonormal basis vectors in each sum are distinct, so both logical states have norm one; their disjoint supports make them orthogonal.
For a binary vector , define the product of Pauli Z gates
where the dot product is computed modulo two. The key diagonal overlap, with and , is
If , every summand is one. If , choose with . Translation permutes and negates every summand. The sum must then be zero. Thus
Off-diagonal logical overlaps vanish for every :
because a diagonal Pauli operator cannot move a computational basis word from one coset to the disjoint other coset.
The possible errors are and for . Set . Each phase flip is its own adjoint and inverse, so
If , the vector is nonzero and has Hamming weight one or two. By the given dual code identity and the minimum Hamming distance three of the Hamming code, it cannot belong to . Hence all its diagonal logical overlaps vanish. If , the product is the identity and its logical overlaps are . Combining both cases gives
This proves the Knill--Laflamme condition with an identity error-overlap matrix, not merely a possibly degenerate scalar matrix. In particular the eight two-dimensional error subspaces are mutually orthogonal. This is precisely nondegenerate phase-flip correction in the Steane code.
To exhibit recovery rather than only the criterion, let be the orthogonal projector onto the code and . The projective measurement consisting of these eight mutually orthogonal projectors, completed by , determines which error occurred. For an arbitrary encoded pure state affected by , outcome occurs with certainty and leaves unchanged. Applying again recovers . The outcome gives the error syndrome and does not reveal or , so recovery preserves logical quantum superpositions.
An equivalent explicit error syndrome uses three commuting X-type stabilizer generators. Choose a parity-check matrix for with the seven different nonzero binary columns:
Its rows span . For a row , the operator permutes each of and , and therefore has eigenvalue on both logical states. A phase flip at position changes its eigenvalue to , since . Measuring the three commuting stabilizer generators gives the th column of as a binary syndrome; no error gives the zero column. All eight outcomes are different, and applying the identified restores the code state. Measuring these stabilizer generators never distinguishes the two logical states.
Finally, if a noise Kraus operator is a coherent linear combination , the same syndrome measurement separates its mutually orthogonal components . Conditional recovery returns in every nonzero branch. Linearity then also corrects any quantum channel whose Kraus operators lie in this span. The argument therefore corrects arbitrary unknown single-site phase flips nondegenerately, including coherent phase-error amplitudes, rather than only a known error on a basis codeword.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.