For , a cycle type lies in exactly when is even. Its conjugacy class is either one class or two equal-sized classes. Splitting occurs exactly when its centralizer in contains no odd permutation. An even-length cycle is itself odd; two equal odd-length cycles can be interchanged by an odd permutation. Conversely, for distinct odd cycle lengths the centralizer is a product of cyclic groups of odd order, all contained in . Thus the classes that split are exactly the partitions of an integer into distinct odd parts. Repeated fixed points count as repeated parts of length one.
For the group is trivial, with its single trivial representation. Assume for the index-two argument that follows. For ordinary representations work over . Tensoring by the sign representation gives . The index-two restriction identity, obtained by Frobenius reciprocity, is
If , restriction is irreducible, and the conjugate pair gives the same irreducible. If , the norm is two, so restriction is the sum of two distinct irreducibles. An odd permutation interchanges them, so both have degree . Every irreducible of occurs in some such restriction: induce it to and choose an irreducible constituent, then apply reciprocity. The displayed inner product distinguishes all the listed constituents. Hence
The first family has degree , the second degree . A choice of labels for the two split classes and constituents fixes the otherwise interchangeable signs.
The one-dimensional representations are characters of the abelianization. For , simplicity and noncommutativity of make its abelianization trivial. For , its commutator subgroup is the Klein four-group and its abelianization is , giving the three characters obtained by sending a quotient generator to . For , has the same three characters; for the group is trivial and has just one. The two additional linear characters at are the split constituents of shape ; at they come from .
Here is a dimension argument that also proves the asserted uniqueness without assuming a classification of small character degrees. Write for the number of standard tableaux. Removing the cell containing the largest label gives
Hook lengths, or direct Young tableau counting, give the following small cases: for every non-linear degree is at least , respectively. Among non-self-conjugate shapes excluding the row, column and standard pair, the minimum degree at is respectively . The self-conjugate shapes at these sizes have half-degrees , respectively, from .
Inductively, for every , a shape other than the row, column or standard pair has all its one-cell predecessors non-linear. If it has at least two removable corners, each predecessor has degree at least , so its degree is at least . If it has only one corner, it is a nontrivial rectangle . Remove that corner and then either of the two corners of . For these two size- shapes are non-linear, so its degree is at least . At there is no nontrivial rectangle. Together with the size-5 and size-6 checks this proves by induction that the standard pair is the only pair of shapes of degree for , and that every other non-linear degree is larger.
We must additionally exclude a self-conjugate shape of degree , since its restriction splits. For , if such a shape has at least three corners, the preceding lower bound gives . With two corners, its predecessors are a conjugate pair and are not standard shapes; the bounds just proved give . With one corner it is a square . For , the two size- predecessors obtained after two removals are nonstandard, giving . The remaining square has degree by the hook-length formula. The size-7 self-conjugate case has degree . This excludes both smaller split degrees and equality with the standard degree.
It follows that the lowest non-linear ordinary degree is for and for every . For no non-linear irreducible exists. The excluded case has lowest degree , although its standard degree- representation is unique. At there are two degree- irreducibles, from the standard conjugate pair and the pair .
Finally, for every the preceding proof gives a unique degree- irreducible, namely the restriction of . The small cases have unique degree , respectively, and has its unique trivial degree- representation. These prove exactly the requested uniqueness range; the omitted cases genuinely fail.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.