One potential form of the Hardy–Littlewood–Sobolev inequality is: if , , and , then
A normalization constant for the Riesz potential only changes . Equivalently, for , and ,
The exponent relation is necessary under dilation. We prove the potential estimate and then derive the bilinear version.
First establish the needed maximal estimate, so it is not an unproved step in the argument. Define the centered Hardy-Littlewood maximal function by . For integrable , cover a compact subset of by finitely many balls whose averages exceed . Order these balls by decreasing radius and greedily retain a ball if it is disjoint from those already retained. Every discarded ball intersects a retained ball of at least its radius, so lies in its triple. Hence
The passage from compact subsets uses inner regularity of Lebesgue measure; the superlevel set is open because fixed-radius local averages are continuous. For , split . The second summand's maximal function is at most , and the first is integrable. Therefore
The layer cake representation and Tonelli theorem give
Thus the Strong Lp bound for the Hardy-Littlewood maximal function is proved for every .
For , split at radius . Dyadic shells with radii give
For the outer part, Hölder's inequality gives
The last integral is finite exactly because . Balance the two bounds by to obtain the Hedberg inequality
The zero cases follow directly or by a limit; is finite almost everywhere by the maximal estimate. Since , integration and the proved maximal bound yield . Taking and pairing with proves the bilinear form by Hölder's inequality, because . All integrals are justified first for nonnegative truncations and then by monotone convergence and the resulting finite bound. The strong estimate does not include or .
Write and . The exponent on the finite-set expression is in the PDF; the TeX aid drops its prime. Ignore zero-measure sets, whose integrals vanish. The equivalence is
For the first bound, let and choose a finite-measure subset . Since ,
Exhaust by its intersections with bounded balls. If its measure is finite these give the desired bound in the limit; if it is infinite they force . Now take the supremum over .
For the other direction it suffices to assume ; the zero and infinite cases are immediate. For a set with , the layer cake representation gives
Split at . The first contribution is , and the second is . Their sum is . Multiply by and take the supremum. This proves the equivalence even when the quantities are extended-valued. The integral expression is an actual norm on the weak Lq space, since the triangle inequality holds inside every set integral. The distribution-function expression is generally a quasi-norm. The factor is sharp: on has and attains on every initial interval. In higher dimensions, multiply this example by the indicator of a unit box in the remaining coordinates.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.