Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge / 2015 / iii / Paper 64 / 1

Take the accretion rate $\dot{M}>0$ to mean inward flow. In a steady state, conservation of mass makes the inward mass flux independent of radius, so $\mathcal{F}=\dot{M}$. Integrating its radial expression givesFor Keplerian rotation, $\Omega =(G{M}_{\ast }/r^3{)}^{1/2}$ and the viscous torque in an accretion disk is $\mathcal{G}=3\pi \bar{\nu }\Sigma \sqrt{G{M}_{\ast }r}$. The zero-torque inner boundary condition therefore sets $\bar{\nu }\Sigma =0$ at $r_{\ast }$. It fixes $C=-\dot{M}\sqrt{r_{\ast }}/(3\pi )$, giving the steady density profileThis is the Keplerian accretion disk solution on $r_{\ast }<r<r_{\mathrm{out}}$. It determines the kinematic viscosity–surface density product; a separate viscosity closure is needed to turn it into an explicit power law. If the kinematic viscosity is finite and nonzero at the inner edge, the surface density tends to zero there.

The standard thin-disk dissipation flux, summed over both faces, follows by substituting the Keplerian accretion disk profile into the viscous heating rate:The Stefan–Boltzmann law gives $\mathcal{C}=2\sigma T^4$ because there are two emitting faces. Local radiative equilibrium consequently gives the effective-temperature profile of a zero-torque diskHere $\sigma$ is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant. The scale $T_{\mathrm{in}}$ is not the temperature exactly at the inner boundary: the zero-torque inner boundary condition makes that formal temperature zero. Maximizing $T^4$ shows that the maximum effective temperature of a zero-torque disk occurs at $r=49r_{\ast }/36$, with $T_{\max }\simeq 0.488T_{\mathrm{in}}$.

At equal central mass and accretion rate, characteristic effective temperatures scale as $r_{\ast }^{-3/4}$. Thus, comparing corresponding values of $r/r_{\ast }$,The neutron-star disk is about 180 times hotter. The Planck law and Wien displacement law move its characteristic emission to about 180 times higher frequency, or 180 times shorter wavelength. A white dwarf disk commonly emits in optical and ultraviolet bands, while the hotter neutron star disk can emit in X-rays. Absolute bands require an actual accretion rate; the relative shift follows directly from the stated scaling.

For the Rayleigh-Jeans spectrum of a finite blackbody disk, the Rayleigh-Jeans law replaces $(e^{h\nu /(kT)}-1{)}^{-1}$ by $kT/(h\nu )$. Here $h$ is the Planck constant and $k$ the Boltzmann constant. The multitemperature blackbody disk therefore hasFor example, setting $R=r_{\mathrm{out}}/r_{\ast }$ makes its frequency-independent coefficient proportional to the finite dimensionless integralAlthough the exact effective temperature vanishes at the inner edge, the very narrow cold rim where the Rayleigh-Jeans law fails makes a negligible contribution in this limit. More formally, after dividing the integrand by ${\nu }^2$, the inequality $e^x-1\ge x$ bounds it by $(k/h)rT$, so dominated convergence justifies the result even at that edge.

At large radius, $T\propto r^{-3/4}$, and the contribution per logarithmic interval is $r^{2}T\propto r^{5/4}$. The outer disk dominates the low-frequency emission because its much greater area outweighs its lower effective temperature.

For intermediate frequencies use the allowed power-law approximation to the effective temperature and introduceThensoThe lower limit is much smaller than one and the upper limit much larger than one. Extending them to zero and infinity leaves a constant: near zero the integrand behaves as $x^{2/3}$, and at infinity it decays exponentially. Hence the intermediate spectrum isThis is the one-third spectrum of a multitemperature disk. Much of the emission comes from radii where $kT(r)$ is of order $h\nu$, moving inward as the frequency rises. With the exact inner-edge profile, a broad intermediate interval also requires frequency well below $k{T}_{\max }/h$; the supplied approximation captures its slope away from the hottest annuli.

Integrating the standard thin-disk dissipation flux over annular area, with both faces already included in $\mathcal{H}$, givesThus the disk luminosity for $r_{\mathrm{out}}\gg r_{\ast }$ isThe Newtonian gravitational potential decreases by approximately $G{M}_{\ast }/r_{\ast }$ per unit mass from a distant outer edge to the surface, giving a potential-energy release rate $G{M}_{\ast }\dot{M}/r_{\ast }$. The standard thin-disk luminosity is half of this.

The missing half remains as kinetic energy of nearly circular orbital motion: at the inner edge $v_K^2=G{M}_{\ast }/r_{\ast }$, so the specific orbital kinetic energy is $G{M}_{\ast }/(2r_{\ast })$. Equivalently, circular motion has total specific mechanical energy $-G{M}_{\ast }/(2r_{\ast })$. Matter joining a slowly rotating star must shed this orbital motion in an accretion-disk boundary layer, producing approximately another $G{M}_{\ast }\dot{M}/(2r_{\ast })$ of luminosity. A rotating star can retain some energy in spin, so equal disk and accretion-disk boundary layer luminosities assume slow stellar rotation. For a central black hole, there is no material surface, and energy can instead be carried inward.

For a slowly rotating central star, the accretion-disk boundary layer radiates a luminosity $L_{\mathrm{BL}}\sim G{M}_{\ast }\dot{M}/(2r_{\ast })$. A layer of thickness comparable to the disk scale height has emitting area $A_{\mathrm{BL}}\sim r_{\ast }H$ times a geometric constant. Applying the Stefan–Boltzmann law to this blackbody area givesComparing with $\sigma T_{\mathrm{in}}^4=3G{M}_{\ast }\dot{M}/(8\pi r_{\ast }^3)$ gives the boundary-layer temperature scalingOnly the scaling is fixed: for a two-faced annulus of area $4\pi r_{\ast }H$, for example, $T_{\mathrm{BL}}^4/T_{\mathrm{in}}^4=r_{\ast }/(3H)$. A surface belt gives a different order-one coefficient.

For a thin disk, $H/r_{\ast }\ll 1$, so a comparable luminosity emerges from a smaller emitting area at a higher effective temperature. The boundary-layer emission is harder than the disk emission, with its Planck law peak shifted to higher frequency. It is also closer to a single-temperature component than the broad multitemperature blackbody disk spectrum, under the adopted uniform-temperature approximation. Rapid stellar rotation weakens the heating and this conclusion's temperature contrast.