Write . The mean-field approximation drops the quadratic product of the fluctuations:
For a Hermitian pairing interaction, the two linear terms are Hermitian conjugates. Defining the BCS anomalous average and pairing field by , and writing , gives
The final constant corrects the double counting in the reduced BCS pairing Hamiltonian.
The canonical anticommutation relations are preserved precisely when the real matrix acting on is orthogonal. Directly,
The other relations are identical or vanish between disjoint pairs. Hence , and one may write , . This fermionic Bogoliubov transformation uses an ordinary rotation; bosonic mixing instead preserves a difference of squared coefficients.
For real and , introduce the particle-hole column . Its quadratic block is the Bogoliubov--de Gennes Hamiltonian
The BCS coherence factors can be chosen to obey
With , choose the sign of to match . The rotation diagonalizes the matrix to . Reordering and restoring the mean-field constant gives
The inverse transformation is and . Both annihilate . Since every positive-energy quasiparticle mode is empty, the normalized BCS ground state is
Each momentum label refers to the pair once; distinct labels use disjoint single-particle spin states.
In each factor of the BCS ground state, the BCS anomalous average is . Self-consistency therefore gives the zero-temperature BCS gap equation
Put . The specified constant attractive interaction makes independent of inside the energy shell and zero outside it:
The printed is incompatible with this interaction: labels relative pair momentum, not the total momentum of a Cooper pair. Every pair here has zero total momentum, while many relative momenta contribute.
For the nonzero solution, the constant-shell BCS gap equation becomes . Let denote the approximately constant single-spin density of states per unit volume at the Fermi level. Then
In weak coupling, . The displayed answer in the question uses . If “total electronic density of states” includes both spin species, , the argument instead reads . If the density counts the whole box rather than unit volume, divide it by before using this formula.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.