Let . The map is linear, and proves the vector-subspace claim. The stated inner product is . By the Plancherel theorem it is positive definite.
More strongly, is onto: for , , since , and satisfies . Thus is an isometric linear bijection, and completeness of gives
This argument includes if zero is allowed in the printed convention.
Take . Its Fourier transform is
with value one at zero. It is bounded near zero and is at infinity, so is integrable for . Therefore
If a continuous function agreed with this indicator almost everywhere, continuity would force it to equal zero on and one on : any violation has a nonempty open neighbourhood of positive measure. The one-sided limits at zero would then differ, a contradiction. Hence no continuous representative exists.
The defining integral is well-defined and bounded for every dimension: and the multiplier is supported on a finite-volume ball. However the asserted general-dimensional conclusion is false for the Euclidean radial cutoff printed in the original PDF. The nonintegrability of a radial triangular Fourier cutoff in three dimensions is a source issue, not an omitted conjugate or OCR substitution.
For a direct counterexample in , take the Schwartz function , whose Fourier transform is the same Gaussian. With and , radial integration gives
The amplitude vanishes at both endpoints, and . Two integrations by parts, with a further one to bound the remainder, give
The integral diverges logarithmically for every fixed . For example, restrict to the periodic subintervals on which ; the error is smaller than half the leading term at sufficiently large . Thus , even for this smooth integrable .
The familiar intended argument is valid in one dimension. There the inverse Fourier kernel is
and by Fubini's theorem. Its mass outside any fixed neighbourhood of zero tends to zero by scaling, so
by continuity of translations in . For arbitrary dimension, replacing the radial cutoff by the product gives a tensor product of these integrable kernels and the same approximate identity proof. These are explicit valid repairs, not claims that the PDF specified a product cutoff.
The implication is true in every dimension despite the failure of part (iii). The hypothesis gives , since its weight is at least one. Let be its inverse Fourier-Plancherel transform; then by construction.
Use the Gaussian approximate identity . Its Fourier transform is . Fourier inversion of this integrable multiplier times the bounded transform of , justified by Fubini, gives the same function both as and as . The first converges to in , while the second converges to in by Plancherel and dominated convergence. Along a common sequence, select subsequences converging almost everywhere for both norms. Their limits agree, giving almost everywhere. Consequently
This proves the requested conclusion without relying on the incorrect general-dimensional kernel assertion.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.