Use discrete dates , a bank account with , and a positive stock with each one-period gross return either or , where . On the natural tree assume both moves have positive physical probability. The Cox--Ross--Rubinstein model is arbitrage-free precisely whenOtherwise a stock/bank position gives nonnegative profit in both states and positive profit in at least one. Under the condition, the unique equivalent martingale measure has independent upward moves with conditional probabilityIndeed , making the discounted stock a martingale. Both branches have positive probability under this measure, ensuring equivalence. The uniqueness/completeness claim is for the stock-generated binomial tree; an enlarged filtration carrying additional untraded risk would change that claim.
For any finite contingent claim measurable at the final date in the natural binomial tree, backward induction givesAt a node with stock , let be its two successor values. Hold, during the next period,The stock and bank holdings reproduce both successor values and cost . Rebalancing at every node is self-financing, and terminal value is . Thus every such claim is replicated and the no-arbitrage price is unique.
Interpret and as trading dates in the discrete model; a payoff at nondates would require an interpolation convention absent from the question. Put . Under , the independent stock returns after giveThe ratio payoff is therefore independent of under , and its time-zero price isAt any date , its price is the same expectation discounted only for the remaining periods. The formula uses the ratio payoff actually specified; multiplying it by would define a different, conventional monetary forward-start call.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.