Use discrete dates , a bank account with , and a positive stock with each one-period gross return either or , where . On the natural tree assume both moves have positive physical probability. The Cox--Ross--Rubinstein model is arbitrage-free precisely when
Otherwise a stock/bank position gives nonnegative profit in both states and positive profit in at least one. Under the condition, the unique equivalent martingale measure has independent upward moves with conditional probability
Indeed , making the discounted stock a martingale. Both branches have positive probability under this measure, ensuring equivalence. The uniqueness/completeness claim is for the stock-generated binomial tree; an enlarged filtration carrying additional untraded risk would change that claim.
For any finite contingent claim measurable at the final date in the natural binomial tree, backward induction gives
At a node with stock , let be its two successor values. Hold, during the next period,
The stock and bank holdings reproduce both successor values and cost . Rebalancing at every node is self-financing, and terminal value is . Thus every such claim is replicated and the no-arbitrage price is unique.
Interpret and as trading dates in the discrete model; a payoff at nondates would require an interpolation convention absent from the question. Put . Under , the independent stock returns after give
The ratio payoff is therefore independent of under , and its time-zero price is
At any date , its price is the same expectation discounted only for the remaining periods. The formula uses the ratio payoff actually specified; multiplying it by would define a different, conventional monetary forward-start call.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.